UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrantx

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the Registrant ý
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ýxDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials

¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
ýxNo fee required.

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 5)Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 1)Amount Previously Paid:

 2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 3)Filing Party:

4)Date Filed:


LOGO


LOGO

March 24, 2016

To Our Shareholders:

Over the last two years, the Board of Directors has made several significant advancements in areas vital to Expeditors’ future success. This transition began with the promotion of Jeffrey S. Musser to President and Chief Executive Officer in March 2014 and continued with our close oversight of changes to many of the key leadership positions at Expeditors in 2014 and 2015. We filled all but one of these key positions with executives who have spent the bulk of their careers with Expeditors and we look to their 22 years of average tenure to continue to inspire our employees and lead the growth strategies of our global business.

With these leadership changes, the Board approved the Company’s new strategic initiatives in 2014 and has diligently monitored management implementation and progress to date. Management has made excellent progress thus far and there is still much more to come.

Based on the Company’s performance, the leadership transition and growth strategies have worked well. We posted great results in 2014 and then we beat them in 2015 – which was the most profitable year in the Company’s history. The Board is extremely proud of this success, as it has given us the flexibility to continue to invest in future growth opportunities and return capital to our shareholders through increased dividends and prudent share repurchases.

The Board also made significant alterations to the executive compensation structure in 2014 and examined the results of those changes in 2015 from several different views, including those of management, shareholders and proxy advisory firms. From a failed say-on-pay vote in 2014, and despite a negative rating from proxy advisory firms in 2015, 67% of our shareholders supported us on NEO compensation last year. As expected, these efforts improved the relationship between the Company’s financial performance and NEO compensation in 2015 as follows:

EPS increased 25% and operating income increased 21%; while

CEO total compensation increased 9% and total NEO compensation decreased 3%.

While we are pleased with this progress and appreciate our shareholders’ support, we have continued our dialogue with shareholders and hired a compensation consulting firm in November 2015 to advise us on further changes the Board should consider to improve our executive compensation programs.

We have also been focused on governance and shareholder rights. Last year, shareholders approved our proxy access framework and, as promised, this year the Board is submitting for your vote a bylaw amendment that implements proxy access rights. Based on outreach to holders of nearly 60% of our shares and a continuing and thorough review of marketplace developments with respect to key parameters of proxy access, the Directors believe the bylaw amendment is a well-defined mechanism that strengthens proxy access rights in ways that promote the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The Board made significant progress towards fulfilling its multi-year succession plan with the appointment of Diane Gulyas to the Board in November 2015 and the nomination of James DuBois on this year’s Board slate. The 2016 Board slate reflects enhanced skill sets and a reduction in tenure.

We also offer a heartfelt and sincere thank you to John Meisenbach, who is retiring from our Board in May. John’s contribution to the Board and to the Company over the last 24 years is immeasurable and we will miss his insight, guidance and sense of humor.

The Board recommendations that are contained in this proxy are made only after careful deliberation over the best interests of our Company, shareholders and employees and prior voting results. On behalf of the entire Board of Directors and more than 15,000 employees of Expeditors, we want to thank you for your continued support and investment in our business.

Sincerely,

/s/ Robert R. Wright

Robert R. Wright

Chairman of the Board

1    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


LOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

OF SHAREHOLDERS

  

Date:

4) Date Filed:














NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Wednesday,Tuesday, May 7, 20143, 2016
 
2:

Time:

9:00 p.m.,a.m. Pacific Time
 

Place:

Expeditors Corporate Headquarters, International

1015 Third Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98104

Record Date:

Close of business on March 8, 2016
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. ("Expeditors" or the “Company”) will be held for the following purposes:
1.To elect eleven (11) directors, each to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders (page 9);
2.To approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (page 31);
3.
To approve the adoption of the 2014 Stock Option Plan (page 34);
4.To approve the amendment to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (page 38);
5.To approve the adoption of the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan (page 40);
6.
To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014 (page 43); and
7.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2014 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment thereof.

March 21, 2014
Seattle, Washington

By Order of the Board of Directors
Peter J. RoseAmy J. Scheer
Chairman of the Board                     Secretary





PROXY SUMMARY
This summary is intended to highlight information that is contained elsewhere in the proxy statement. It is not intended to provide all the information you should consider as you determine how you will vote on issues placed before the shareholders. You should carefully read the proposals as contained within the body of the proxy itself as you contemplate your vote.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
WHEN:
May 7, 2014WHERE:Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.Meeting Agenda:
 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time Corporate Headquarters
   1015 Third AvenueElectionof 11 Directors
   Seattle, Washington 98104Approve(advisory) executive compensation
Approve2016 Stock Option Plan
Ratifyappointment of independent auditors for 2016
Approvea Proxy Access Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws

Vote on a shareholder proposal, if presented at meeting

Voting:

Important Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

This notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and related proxy materials are being distributed or made available to shareholders beginning on or about March 24, 2016. This includes instructions on how to access these materials (including our Proxy Statement and 2015 Annual Report to shareholders) online.

Please vote your shares

We encourage shareholders to vote promptly, as this will save the expense of record date, March 6, 2014, are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to oneadditional proxy solicitation.

You may vote for eachin the following ways:

LOGO

By Order of the 11 director nominees and one vote on each other proposal.

HOW TO VOTE:
Each shareholder vote is important. Please submit your vote and proxy by Internet or telephone or sign, date and return your proxy by mail.
Board of Directors,

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

/s/ Benjamin G. Clark

Benjamin G. Clark

Corporate Secretary

Seattle, Washington

March 24, 2016

2    |    Notice of Annual Meeting Agenda Items and Board Recommendations

& Proxy Statement


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ProposalProxy Summary  Board Recommendation4
Election of 11 Directors (page 9)
FOR each Director Nominee
Executive Compensation - advisory non-binding vote on compensation of the Named Executive Officers. (page 31)
FOR
Approve 2014 Stock Option Plan - vote to approve 2,750,000 shares for a broad-based equity compensation program. (page 34)
FOR
Approve Amendment to 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan - vote to approve amendment to add 3,000,000 shares to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (page 38)
FOR
Approve 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan - vote to approve 250,000 shares to the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan. (page 40)
FOR
Ratification of Auditors - ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014. (page 43)
FOR
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting-




BOARD NOMINEES
Name Age Director Since Principal Occupation Indep-endent Committees Other Public Company Boards
AC CC NCGC
Peter J. Rose 70 1981 Chairman of the Board, Former CEO, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.         
Robert R. Wright 54 2008 CEO, Matthew G. Norton Company ID, L C, F ID   
Mark A. Emmert(1) 61 2008 President, National Collegiate Athletic Association ID ID   ID 2
R. Jordan Gates 58 2000 President and COO, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.         
Dan P. Kourkoumelis 62 1993 Former President and CEO, Quality Food Centers, Inc. ID     C 
Michael J. Malone(2) 69 1998 Principal, Hunters Capital ID   ID   1
John W. Meisenbach(3) 77 1991 Chairman, MCM Financial ID   C   1
Jeffrey S. Musser 48 2014 President and CEO, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.         
Liane J. Pelletier(4) 56 2013 Former Chairman, President and CEO, Alaska Communications Systems ID ID   ID 2
James L.K. Wang 65 1988 President-Asia Pacific, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.         
Tay Yoshitani 67 2012 CEO, Port of Seattle ID     ID 
                 
      2013 Meetings 4 5 2  
                 
AC Audit Committee   C Chair  
CC Compensation Committee   F Financial Expert  
NCGC Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee L Lead Director
          ID Independent Director
___________________
(1)Board OperationsDr. Emmert serves on the Boards of Weyerhauser Company and of Omnicare, Inc.9

Director Compensation Program

(2)Communicating with Our ShareholdersMr. Malone serves on the Board of Homestreet Bank.12
(3)Stock Ownership InformationMr. Meisenbach serves on the Board13

Five Percent Owners of Costco Wholesale Corporation.Company Stock

Security Ownership of Directors & Executive Officers

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

(4)Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee ReportMs. Pelletier serves on the Boards of Atlantic Tele-Network and of Washington Federal.16
Attendance: During 2013 the Board held eight meetings. Each of the Company's current directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and Committees on which the member served.
Director Elections:Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.



2013 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
Throughout this Proxy Summary and the Company's Proxy Statement, the individuals who served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President-Asia Pacific, President and Chief Operating Officer, President-The Americas and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer during fiscal 2013, are referred to as the Named Executive Officers ("NEO"). The term Executive Officer refers to individuals who are NEO and senior management who participate in the equity and non-equity components of the Company's executive compensation program ("Compensation Program").
In 2013, gross revenues increased 1%, while net revenue and operating income increased 3% and 4%, respectively. Net earnings were up 5% while earnings per share was up 7% in 2013 as compared to 2012. The Company’s 2008 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan ("Executive Incentive Compensation Plan") ties increases in executive compensation to increases in operating income. Average Named Executive Officer ("NEO") compensation in 2013, excluding Mr. Rose's retirement bonus, increased 1%. The increase was less than the increase in operating income because the former CEO and other NEO percentages of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan bonus pool ("Bonus Pool") were reduced as more participants were added to the Bonus Pool.
The Compensation Committee believes that the negligible compensation increases in CEO and other NEO compensation, significantly below the 4% operating income growth achieved by the Company in 2013, are consistent with and representative of the design and purpose of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. The Compensation Committee also believes that the relatively modest base salaries paid to the CEO and other NEO, with the remainder of their compensation linked to maintaining and increasing operating income, focuses attention on customer retention while at the same time providing growth incentives by directly rewarding operating income growth, the predominant driver of increases in corporate profitability. The Compensation Committee believes the combination of this focus contributes to both the stability and quality of earnings.



Total compensation, as disclosed in the summary compensation table and calculated under SEC rules, includes items that are impacted by timing differences between when salary expense is accrued in the Company’s financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and when the cash payments are actually received by the CEO and other NEO and accounted for as income by the recipient in accordance with Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reporting requirements. To supplement the Company's disclosure, it has added the “W-2 Realized Compensation” column to the right of the table below to compare NEO 2013 compensation as recorded under SEC rules with corresponding W-2 income for 2013.
Name and Position Salary Bonus Stock Awards Option
Awards

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

All Other
Compensation

SEC Total W-2 Realized Compensation(3)
Peter J. Rose(1)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 $110,000
   $60,800
 $5,368,337
 $8,002,123
 $13,541,260
 $5,689,249
James L.K. Wang(2)
President-Asia Pacific
 $100,000
   $60,800
 $5,076,579
 $
 $5,237,379
 N/A
R. Jordan Gates President and Chief Operating Officer
 $100,000
   $60,800
 $4,201,306
 $1,500
 $4,363,606
 $4,297,665
Robert L. Villanueva President-The Americas
 $100,000
   $60,800
 $3,909,549
 $1,500
 $4,071,849
 $4,000,244
Bradley S. Powell Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 $100,000
   $60,800
 $2,706,051
 $1,500
 $2,868,351
 $2,780,655
___________________
(1)Proposal No. 1: Election of 11 DirectorsMr. Rose retired as CEO effective March 1, 2014. The "All Other Compensation" column, includes the accrual of $7,955,000 for Mr. Rose's retirement bonus which will be paid out in 2014 and 2015. Mr. Rose will receive a retirement bonus equal to the amount he would have received under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for 2014 and the first five months of 2015, assuming that Mr. Rose received the same percentage of the Bonus Pool under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan that was used to calculate his incentive compensation for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. As allowed by the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee will not reallocate Mr. Rose's current percentage of the available Bonus Pool to other Executive Officers or key employees until actual payments made to Mr. Rose under the Succession Agreement are complete and the amount equal to the total retirement bonus paid has been recouped. In short, Mr. Rose's retirement bonus will be funded by reducing the amounts otherwise available to Executive Officers or other key employees under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan until paid in full and as a result there will be no cumulative impact on net earnings available to shareholders or on cash flow. The amount in the "All Other Compensation" column also includes $45,623 for legal and tax advice related to finalizing Mr. Rose's Succession Agreement.19
(2)Compensation Committee ReportMr. Wang is a resident of Taiwan25

Shareholder Feedback Following the 2014 and is not a US taxpayer, and accordingly, does not receive a W-2.2015 Say-On-Pay Votes

Response to Proxy Advisory Firm Feedback

(3)Compensation Discussion & AnalysisPayments to28

Our Compensation Philosophy

Key Compensation Practices

Summary of Key Elements of Executive Officers and other key employees under the Compensation

Risk & Recovery

Alignment of Executive Compensation Programs with Shareholders’ Interests

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan are paid out quarterly after filing the Form 10-Q with the SEC. Amounts of Executive

Equity Incentive Compensation Plan bonuses accrued in the fourth quarter for SEC reporting purposes, are not paid out until after March 1st of the following year, when the Form 10-K has been filed. This creates a timing difference between when amounts are accrued and recorded in accordance with SEC reporting requirements and when they are paid and accounted as income in accordance with IRS rules. This means that amounts shown in the "W-2 Realized Compensation" column contain the compensation earned in the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first three quarters of 2013, but actually paid to the recipient in 2013.




EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
ü

Role of the Compensation Committee, Management & Consultants

Pay for performance. Over 95% of compensation for CEO and other NEO is derived from non-equity incentive compensation program that is directly connected to actual operating income results, by far the vast component of Company performance.
ü

Executive Stock Ownership Policy

Linkage between performance measures and strategic objectives. Performance measures for non-equity incentive compensation program are linked to both strategic, near-term and long-term operating objectives designed to create long-term stockholder value.
ü

Insider Trading Policy Prohibits Hedging or Pledging

No tax gross ups. The Company does not provide tax gross ups for compensation related to equity or non-equity compensation plans.
ü

Potential Payments upon Termination & Change in Control

No repricing or exchange of underwater stock options. The Company's equity compensation program does not permit repricing or allow for exchange of underwater stock options.
ü

Summary Compensation Table for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015

Insider trading policy that prohibits hedging of securities.
ü
Executive stock ownership guidelines. Designed to increase Executives' equity stake in the Company and to further align Executives interests more closely with those of shareholders.
ü
Annual vote on say-on-pay.
ü
Moderate change-in-control benefits. Change-in-control severance benefits are limited to realized gains on acceleration of unvested stock options; and, payment of one-half of total cash compensation received in the preceding 12 months only upon termination without cause; or, payment of one-half of base salary upon termination with cause with a non-compete agreement.
ü
"Prospective claw-back" of certain compensation in the event of restatement. Since the non-equity incentive compensation program is based on cumulative operating income, any operating losses that are incurred by the Company must be recovered from future operating profits before any amounts will be due to participating Executives.
ü
Independent oversight and disciplined methodology for allocation of the Bonus Pool. With respect to the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, all amounts allocated to participating NEO, Executive Officers and other key employees, must be reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee, all of whom are Independent Directors.
ELEMENTS
CASHSalaryModest base salaries.
Proposal No. 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation  46
Annual IncentiveProvides the potential for significant above-market compensation. Based on a percentage of a Bonus Pool (10% of pre-bonus operating income) intended to incentivize NEO, Executive Officers and other key employees, to retain and grow profitable business. 
EQUITYProposal No. 3: Approve 2016 Stock OptionsBroad-based employee stock option plan that vests 50% after three years and 25% each in years four and five and expire 10 years from date of grant.
Option Plan  47
ESPPThe Company maintains a voluntary Employee Stock Purchase Plan which allows all employees to purchase up to $21,250 of Common Stock annually. In general, the Company has no pension plans other than those required by statute and available to all employees.
RETIREMENTAudit Committee Report401(k) PlanThe Company provides an annual match of up $1,500.51
OTHERPerquisites
Proposal No. 4: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmNo significant or material perquisites.52
Proposal No. 5: Vote to Approve a Proxy Access Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws53
Shareholder Proposal57
Other Information60

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Certain Relationships & Related Transactions

Voting Procedures

Voting Securities

Solicitation of Proxies

Deadlines for Shareholder Proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Householding

Appendix A: 2016 Stock Option PlanA-1
Appendix B: Stock Option AgreementB-1
Appendix C: Form of Bylaw Amendment to Implement Proxy AccessC-1




EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN
A broad-based equity compensation program has historically been an important component of Expeditors’ overall compensation philosophy. The Company firmly believes that when used in a broad-based format, employee stock option grants provide a powerful means to align the interests of the Company’s employees with those of its shareholders. The Company, in 2005, instituted what it considered to be a very “pro-shareholder” policy of seeking annual shareholder approval of proposed stock option grants. Consistent with prior years, in 2013, 97% of stock options granted were awarded to employees that were not Executive Officers. Management and the Board of Directors feel strongly that broad-based stock option grants need to be a continuing component of the Company’s overall compensation program. At the annual meeting, the shareholders will be asked to approve the Company’s 2014 Stock Option Plan which will make available 2,750,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock for purchase upon exercise of options granted under this plan. One of the Company’s primary purposes for extending stock options to its employees is that the Company provides very limited retirement benefits. The Company has always stressed to its employees the importance of utilizing stock options as a means for providing for significant life events such as retirement, medical and other emergencies, and to provide for higher education costs for dependents, to name a few. See Proposal

3    approval|    Notice of the 2014 Stock Option Plan found on page 34 for further information.

2002 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
At the 2014 annual meeting, the shareholders are asked to approve an amendment to the Company’s 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase, by 3,000,000 shares, the Company’s common stock available for purchase under the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Management and the Board of Directors believe that the 2002 plan has contributed to strengthening the incentive of participating employees to acquire a greater proprietary interest in the Company. As was noted above when addressing the need for the approval of the 2014 Employee Stock Option plan, the Company provides very minimal retirement benefits, instead electing to provide opportunities to its employees to invest in the Company’s future by offering the potential to share a percentage of any increases in Company value. The 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides an excellent opportunity to do this without causing undue shareholder dilution. Please revert to Proposal 4 on page 38 for more information concerning the plan.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Historically, the Board has used a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. In 2008, the shareholders approved the 2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, which was only for the benefit of independent non-management directors ("Independent Directors") and terminated on June 1, 2013. Each Independent Director received $200,000 worth of Expeditors restricted stock on June 1st of each year beginning in 2008 through 2013. The Board is requesting shareholders approve the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan and 250,000 shares of stock to be authorized for issuances to Independent Directors. Under the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan, each Independent Director will receive $200,000 worth of Expeditors stock on May 20th of each year and such shares will vest immediately upon grant. Based on the current number of Independent Directors and history of shares issued under the 2008 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan, it is expected that 250,000 shares will be adequate for the five-year term of the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan. The 250,000 shares reserved for the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan, were subtracted from the 3,000,000 shares normally requested each year for employee stock options, so as to minimize any impacts of dilution to the shareholders. For more information regarding director compensation, see “Director Compensation” on page 12.
The Board has adopted a policy of stock ownership guidelines that require the Company’s Independent Directors to accumulate a minimum of 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over a six-year period from the date elected to the Board or policy adoption date.



GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
BOARD LEADERSHIP
Effective with Mr. Rose's retirement on March 1, 2014, and the appointment of Jeffrey S. Musser as CEO, the roles of Chairman and CEO were separated. If elected at the Annual Meeting Mr. Rose will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board until May of 2015. Since Mr. Rose is not considered an independent Chairman, the Board will continue to maintain the position of Independent Lead Director established in 2010. The Independent Lead Director is selected by the Independent Directors to serve as a presiding director, with broad authority and responsibility over Board governance and operations. After Mr. Rose retires as Chairman in May of 2015, an Independent Board Chair will be selected by the independent directors. At that time, the Independent Lead Director position will no longer be necessary. See “Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight" on page 5 for additional information.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Currently 7 of the 11 director nominees are independent. All Committees are composed of Independent Directors.
MAJORITY VOTE STANDARD
The Company’s bylaws require that in an uncontested election each director will be elected by the vote of the majority of votes cast. See “Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections” on page 9 for more information.
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APPROVAL POLICY
The Board requires that any Board action be approved by a majority of Independent Directors. It is expected that the Board will return to a two-third majority vote in 2015, upon Mr. Rose’s retirement as Chairman of the Board.
BOARD RISK OVERSIGHT
The Board has oversight for risk management with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company including strategic, operational, financial and legal and compliance risks. See “Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight" on page 5 for additional information.






& Proxy Statement



TABLE OF CONTENTS    
PROXY STATEMENT1
 PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF THE 2014 STOCK OPTION PLAN34
     
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES3
 PROPOSAL 4—APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN38
     
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4
 PROPOSAL 5—APPROVAL OF THE 2014 DIRECTORS' RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN41
     
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS9
 PROPOSAL 6—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 201443
     
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT12
 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS44
     
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION12
 SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE44
     
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS14
 DEADLINES FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS45
     
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION15
 SOLICITATION OF PROXIES45
     
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT25
 APPENDIX A—2014 STOCK OPTION PLANA-1
     
2013 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE26
 APPENDIX B—2014 STOCK OPTION PLAN AGREEMENTB-1
     
2013 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE27
 APPENDIX C—2002 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN AMENDMENTC-1
     
2013 OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUE TABLES28
 APPENDIX D—2014 DIRECTORS' RESTRICTED STOCK PLAND-1
     
PROPOSAL 2—NON-BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS31
 APPENDIX E—2014 DIRECTORS' RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN AGREEMENTE-1
     

    
PROXY STATEMENT
SUMMARY

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (the “Company”, “Expeditors”, “we”) for use at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy summary is intended to be held atprovide a broad overview of the Company’s offices atitems that you will find elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. As this is only a summary, we encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement for more information about these topics prior to voting.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

DATE: Tuesday, May 3, 2016

TIME: 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time

LOCATION: Expeditors International, 1015 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington on Wednesday, May 7, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. local time, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Only shareholders of record at the close98104

RECORD DATE: Close of business on March 6, 2014 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. On or about March 21, 2014, the Company will mail to shareholders either: (i) a copy of the Proxy Statement, a form of proxy and an Annual Report, or (ii) a notice of Internet availability of proxy materials, which will indicate how to access the proxy materials on the Internet.

You may instruct the proxies to vote ‘‘FOR’’ or ‘‘AGAINST’’ each proposal, or you may instruct the proxies to ‘‘ABSTAIN’’ from voting. Each share of our common stock outstanding on the record date will be entitled to one vote on each of the 11 director nominees and one vote on each other proposal. If the accompanying form of proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, such shares will be voted in accordance with the Board's recommendations as follows:
8, 2016

Meeting Agenda & Voting Recommendations

Proposal

 Board

Board’s Voting

Recommendation

 Rationale

Page References

(for Board Recommendationmore detail)

No. 1: Election of 11 Directors

 

LOGO   FOR each Director Nominee(each nominee)

 Talented slate of nominees bringing the full complement of director skills to serve the Company.

pp. 19

Executive Compensation- advisory non-binding vote on compensation of the

No. 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officers.

Officer Compensation

 

LOGO   FOR

 Executive compensation is aligned with Company's performance.

pp. 46

No. 3: Approve 20142016 Stock Option Plan - vote

LOGO   FOR

pp. 47

No. 4: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

LOGO   FOR

pp. 52

No. 5: Approve a Proxy Access Amendment to approvethe Company’s Bylaws

LOGO   FOR

pp. 53

No. 6: Shareholder Proposal: Recovery of Unearned Management Bonuses

LOGO   AGAINST

pp. 57

2015 Performance Highlights

2015 was the best year in our Company’s history. Milestones included:

Achieving record levels of net revenues(1), operating income, and earnings per share (EPS)(2)

Improving our efficiency as measured by operating income as a percentage of net revenues to 33%

Realizing meaningful progress against our strategic initiatives and enablers contributing to our overall performance

Returning record levels of cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases

LOGO

4    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROXY SUMMARY

2015 Compensation Highlights

Beginning with the promotion of Jeffrey S. Musser to President and Chief Executive Officer in March 2014, we have successfully transitioned many of the leadership positions at Expeditors and developed and began implementation of our strategic initiatives. These changes, combined with the alterations made to our executive compensation structure in 2014, improved the relationship between the Company’s financial performance and Named Executive Officers (“NEO”) compensation in 2015 as follows:

EPS increased 25% and operating income increased 21%; while

CEO total compensation increased 9% and total NEO compensation decreased 3%.

The charts below show the Company’s operational performance compared to total NEO compensation and Expeditors’ total shareholder return (“TSR”) compared to Peer Group TSR over the past three years, indexed year-to-year performance using a January 1, 2013 base year investment of $100. TSR consists of stock price appreciation plus reinvested dividends.

LOGO

(1)Excludes former CEO’s retirement bonus of $8 million in 2013.

We made significant alterations to our compensation structure in 2014 and examined the results of those changes in 2015 from several different views, including those of employees, shareholders and proxy advisory firms. From a failed say-on-pay vote in 2014 with 44% of shareholders supporting NEO compensation, and despite a negative rating from proxy advisory firms in 2015, 67% of our shareholders supported our NEO compensation structure last year. These structural changes, combined with the transition of our leadership, have proven as effective as we expected. Most importantly, we have maintained the core compensation programs that are critical to preserving our culture.

5    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROXY SUMMARY

LOGO

In 2014 and 2015, we made several changes in our approach to designing our NEO compensation programs, including:

Establishing a broad-basedpolicy prohibiting future retirement bonuses

Implementing a compensation plan that significantly reduced cash bonuses allocated to NEO under the non-equity incentive compensation plan

Capping increases to NEO compensation

Increasing long-term incentive compensation by granting additional time-vested stock option awards to NEO

Implementing an executive stock ownership policy

Expanding compensation “clawback policy” for financial restatements to include all members of senior management

Hiring a compensation consulting firm in November 2015 to advise us on potential future changes we can make to improve our executive compensation programs

Continuing our dialogue with shareholders

(1)Excludes former CEO’s
retirement bonus of $8 million
in 2013.

The table below shows the significant reductions in executive incentive bonus pool payouts from 2013 to 2015. Percentages paid out to NEO positions in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan were as follows:

LOGO

(1)CEO was P. Rose in 2013 and J. Musser in 2014 and 2015.

(2)NEO1 was R. Villanueva in 2013 and P. Coughlin in 2014 and 2015.

(3)NEO2 was J. Wang in 2013 and 2014 and E. Alger in 2015.

(4)NEO3 was J. Gates in 2013 and 2014 and D. Wall in 2015.

(5)CFO was B. Powell for all periods presented.

6    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROXY SUMMARY

The table below shows the increases in long-term incentive compensation in the form of time vested stock option grants to NEO positions from 2013 to 2015.

LOGO

(1)CEO was P. Rose in 2013 and J. Musser in 2014 and 2015.

(2)NEO1 was R. Villanueva in 2013 and P. Coughlin in 2014 and 2015.

(3)NEO2 was J. Wang in 2013 and 2014 and E. Alger in 2015.

(4)NEO3 was J. Gates in 2013 and 2014 and D. Wall in 2015.

(5)CFO was B. Powell for all periods presented.

Compensation Philosophy

When it comes to compensation philosophy, we’re different.

We think to get differentiated results, you have to have a different approach. Conventional wisdom these days is that to properly incentivize management, a company has to use several, non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures. We disagree.

We believe that our compensation programs are one of the unique characteristics responsible for differentiating our performance from that of many of our competitors. Throughout our history, managers, including our most senior managers, have been compensated through a combination of three basic techniques. These consist of:

1.A fixed and modest base salary currently set at $100,000 for our NEO and senior managers;

2.A long-term incentive equity compensation program which includesin the authorizationform of 2,750,000 shares available for grant.time-vested stock option grants; and

 FOR3.To continue to align the interestsA non-equity incentive compensation program based on a fixed percentage of the Company's employees with those of the shareholders.
Approve Amendment to 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan - vote to approve amendment to the Company’s 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan which includes the authorization of 3,000,000 shares available for issuance.
FORTo reinforce the culture of ownership by continuing to allow and encourage all employees to own stock in the Company.
Approve 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan - vote to approve Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan which includes authorization of 250,000 shares available for grant.
FORTo continue to allow the Company to compensate its Independent Directors with Common Stock in the equivalent amount of $200,000 per year, per Director, upon election.
Ratification of Auditors - ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.
FORKPMG LLP is independent and knowledgeable of Company operations with global coverage.operating income.

By design, our compensation model is highly variable. We believe this motivates and properly incentivizes management to grow our business, keep costs in check and continue to generate positive operating income. No bonus is guaranteed, since the vast majority of our business is not under long-term contract and is regularly put out for bid. We have to earn our customers’ business with every shipment, and we need a compensation structure that reflects this high customer service, short-cycle model. The design also holds management fully accountable for excessive risk-taking as any operating losses that are incurred must be recovered in full from future operating income before any non-equity incentives are re-initiated.

7    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROXY SUMMARY

LOGO

The single largest component of NEO compensation is non-equity incentive compensation based on GAAP operating income. Operating income captures many elements of managing a healthy business, including growing and Annual Reportmaintaining profitable business, gaining new customers, improving customer satisfaction, managing carriers and service provider relationships and costs, increasing employee satisfaction and retention, controlling expenses and collecting cash timely.

There are availablemany targets and measures one could use to assess management’s performance, such as gross revenue, expense control and budget targets. To be successful, management must optimize the Company’s registered holdersmultiple elements of a full P&L, culminating with operating income. This metric is comprehensive, simple, objective and employeeeasily understood. It reflects short- and long-term growth and efficiency, and creates a prudent and entrepreneurial environment.

The second largest component of NEO compensation is time-vested stock purchase plan participantsoptions awarded at www.envisionreports.com/expd and to the Company’s beneficial holders at www.edocumentview.com/expd.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please submit your vote and proxy by telephone or by Internet in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card. This will ensure a quorumfair value at the meeting.date of grant. The givingNEO only realizes compensation if the value of the proxy will not affect your rightCompany increases over the long-term.

Governance Highlights

The 2015 Board slate reflects enhanced skill sets, backgrounds that are closely mapped to vote at the meeting if the proxy is revokedExpeditor’s strategic direction, a reduction in the manner set forthtenure, and enhanced Board diversity. The slate reflects a multi-year Board succession plan established in the accompanying proxy statement.

2014:

Abstentions are counted for quorum purposes. If you return a signed proxy card/voting instruction form to allow your shares to be represented at the annual meeting, but do not indicate how your shares should be voted on one or more proposals listed above, then the proxies will vote your sharesAdded Diane Gulyas as an additional independent member of the Board of Directors recommends on those proposals. Other than the proposals listed above, we do not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies may vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.enhance global business management experience

Any shareholder executing a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time priorAdded James “Jim” DuBois to the voting thereof on any matter (without, however, affecting any vote taken prior to such revocation) by delivering written notice to the Secretaryslate of the Company, by executing and delivering to the Company another proxy dated asindependent members of a later date or by voting in person at the meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors, the non-binding vote approving compensation of Named Executive Officers, the approval of the 2014 Stock Option Plan, the approval of the amendment to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the approval of the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your bank or broker how to vote in these matters, no votes will be cast on your behalf. Your bank or broker will have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If you are a shareholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals at the Annual Meeting.
VOTING SECURITIES
The only outstanding voting securities of the Company are shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value (the “Common Stock”). As of the Record Date, there were 201,065,104 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, and each such share is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. The presence in person or by proxy of holders of record of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares of Common Stock underlying abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.
Under Washington law and the Company’s bylaws, if a quorum is present, the eleven nominees for election to the Board of Directors who receiveto augment IT and cybersecurity expertise

We acted upon the majority of the votes cast by voters physically present at the Annual Meeting or represented by2015 shareholder vote to establish a proxy shall be elected Directors. Abstentionsaccess framework and broker non-votes will not be counted either in favor of or against the election of the nominees and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

With respect to the proposalsare putting forth for shareholder approval a non-binding vote approving the compensation of Named Executive Officers, approval of the 2014 Stock Option Plan, the approval of theproxy access amendment to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,Company’s Bylaws. We also updated and strengthened the approvalCompany’s Code of Business Conduct. In addition, we refined and strengthened our enterprise risk oversight program, and allocated accountability for risk oversight across the committees and the full Board. Lastly, we decreased the number of non-independent Directors.

8    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


BOARD OPERATIONS

The Board of Directors has adopted policies and procedures to ensure effective operations and governance. Our corporate governance materials, including our Corporate Governance Principles, the Charters of each of the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock PlanBoard’s Committees and the ratificationour Code of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, such proposals will be approved if the votes cast by voters physically present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast against such proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted either in favor of or against such proposals and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcomes of such proposals.

No cumulative voting rights are authorized, and dissenters’ rights are not applicable to any of the matters being voted on.
Proxies and ballots will be received and tabulated by Computershare Trust Company, N.A., an independent business entity not affiliated with the Company.
The Common Stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol EXPD. The last sale price for the Common Stock, as reported by NASDAQ on March 6, 2014, was $39.54 per share.





PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2013, with respect to all shareholders known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of its outstanding Common Stock. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to the shares shown.
Name and Address 
Amount and  Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership
 
Percent
of Class
The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355 15,366,543(1) 7.47%
Fiduciary Management, Inc., 100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2200, Milwaukee, WI 53202 12,114,390(2) 5.89%
BlackRock, Inc., 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022 11,623,227(3) 5.70%
 ___________________
(1)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2013, according to Schedule 13G/A dated February 6, 2014 filed by The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser. The Vanguard Group reports that it has sole voting power with respect to 334,058 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 15,053,685 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power of 312,858 shares of common stock.
(2)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2013, according to Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2014 filed by Fiduciary Management, Inc., an investment adviser.
(3)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2013, according to Schedule 13G/A dated January 17, 2014 filed by BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company. BlackRock, Inc. reports that it has sole voting power with respect to 9,687,927 shares of common stock.

13



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board and Nominating Committee expect each non-management director to be free of interests or affiliations that could give rise to a biased approach to directorship responsibilities or a conflict of interest, and free of any significant relationship with the Company that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. The Board and Nominating Committee also expect each director to act in a manner consistent with a director’s duties of loyalty and care. All nominees for election must comply with the applicable requirements of the Company’s Bylaws, whichBusiness Conduct, can be found on the Securities and Exchange Commissionour website atwww.sec.gov as Exhibit 3.2 towww.investor.expeditors.com. In 2015, the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SecuritiesBoard was composed of nine independent Directors and Exchange Commission on or about December 23, 2013. The Company’s Executive Officers may not serve on boards of other corporations whose executive officers serve on the Company’s Board.
Board of Directors
Key Responsibilities: Strategic oversight; corporate governance; stockholder advocacy; and leadership.
Meetings in 2013: 8
Directors: Peter J. Rose, Chairman; Board consists of 11 Directors, 7 of whom are Independent.
Independent Lead Director: Robert R. Wright
Board has designated that only Independent Directors can servetwo non-independent Directors. Mr. Wright serves as Committee members.
Audit Committee
Key Responsibilities: Meeting with the internal financial and audit staff of the Company and members of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by the Company to review:
the scope and findings of the annual audit and other procedures;
quarterly and annual financial statements; and
the internal controls employed by the Company.
Meetings in 2013: 4
Directors: Robert R. Wright, Chair and Financial Expert; Mark A. Emmert; and Liane J. Pelletier.
Committee Report: Please refer to page 12.
Compensation Committee
Key Responsibilities: Consultation with management in establishing the Company’s policies on senior management compensation; overseeing the implementation of short and long term compensation programs for senior management; determining base salary, participation level in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and stock option grants to the CEO; ensuring that incentive compensation programs are consistent with the Company’s annual and long term performance objectives and do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking; and reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors on compensation of non-management directors.
Meetings in 2013: 5
Directors: John W. Meisenbach, Chair; Robert R. Wright; and Michael J. Malone.
Committee Report: Please refer to page 25.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Key Responsibilities: Identifying and recommending candidates to be nominated by the Board for election as directors and providing leadership role with respect to corporate governance of the Company.
Meetings in 2013: 2
Directors: Dan P. Kourkoumelis, Chair; Mark A. Emmert; Liane J. Pelletier; and Tay Yoshitani.

14



Key Corporate Governance Policies Include:
üAnnual election of all directors.
ü
Majority vote standard in uncontested elections. Each director must be elected by a majority of votes cast, not a plurality.
üNo stockholder rights plan (“poison pill”).
ü
Separate CEO and Chairman role.
üThe majority of the Board is comprised of Independent Directors.
üIndependent Lead Director.
ü
Independent Board Committees. Each of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees is made up of Independent Directors. Each standing Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board.
ü
Independent Director approval requirements. Policy requires any Board action to be approved by a majority of the independent directors.
ü
Independent Director authority. Each of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees has the authority to retain independent advisors.
ü
Robust Code of Business Conduct. The Company is committed to the highest standards of legal and ethical business conduct. This Code of Business Conduct summarizes the legal, ethical and regulatory standards that Expeditors must follow and is a reminder to the Company's directors, officers and employees of the seriousness of Expeditors' commitment to compliance. Compliance with this Code of Business Conduct and the highest standards of business conduct is mandatory for every Expeditors director, officer and employee. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct is available at www.expeditors.com.
ü
Regular Board self-evaluation process. The Board and each committee evaluates its performance on an annual basis.
ü
Stock ownership guidelines for executives and directors. Significant requirements strongly link the interests of the Board and management with those of stockholders.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
There are currently eleven members of the Board, four current and former management directors and seven independent non-management directors ("Independent Directors"). The Board has a Lead Independent Director ("Lead Director") and three standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance. All of the Board committees are comprised solely of the seven independent non-management directors. The four current and former management directors have been deliberately excluded from membership on any of the Board’s standing committees. The Independent Directors hold executive sessions at Board and Committee meetings, as needed, and at such other times as they deem appropriate.
The role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was combined when Mr. Rose was appointed to these roles in 1991 and separated effective upon Mr. Rose's retirement as Chief Executive Officer on March 1, 2014. Mr. Rose will remain as the Chairman, if elected, through to the next Annual Meeting in May 2015. For purposes of 2014, Mr. Rose will continue to be considered a non-independent Chairman. Mr. Rose was succeeded as Chief Executive Officer by Jeffrey S. Musser. Mr. Musser is the son-in-law to Mr. Rose and during the period Mr. Rose serves as non-independent Chairman, he will report independently and directly to the Board via the Lead Director.
Management is responsible for the assessment and management of risk and brings to the attention of the Board the material risks to the Company. The Board of Directors provides oversight and guidance to management regarding the material risks. Further, the Board has delegated oversight responsibilities for certain areas of risk to its three standing committees as described below. The Board and its committees regularly discuss with management the Company’s strategies, goals and policies and inherent associated risks in order to assess appropriate levels of risk taking and steps

15



taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Board of Directors believes that the risk management processes in place for the Company are appropriate. The Company believes that the active oversight role played by the Lead Director as well as its Board Committees, which consist solely of Independent Directors, provides the appropriate level of independent oversight for the Company.
Following the completion of Mr. Rose's service as the Chairman of the Board in 2015, the position of ChairmanDirectors. The primary functions of the Board shall be filled by a director that is “independent” within the meaning of all applicable independence requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Following the appointment of an Independent Director to the position of Chairman of the Board, the position of Lead Director shall be suspended.
Lead Independent Director
On May 5, 2010, theExpeditors’ Board of Directors appointed Robert R. Wright toinclude:

Ensuring that the rolelong-term interests of Lead Director. As Lead Director, Mr. Wright is responsible for: (1) presiding at all meetingsshareholders are being served;

Approving and monitoring strategies and related management performance;

Overseeing the conduct of our business and monitoring significant enterprise risks;

Overseeing our processes for maintaining the integrity of our financial statements and other public disclosures, and compliance with laws and ethical conduct;

Evaluating CEO and senior management performance and determining executive compensation;

Planning CEO succession and monitoring management’s succession planning for other key executive officers; and

Establishing effective governance structure, including appropriate Board if/when the Chairman is not able to be present; (2) presiding at executive sessions of the Independent directors; (3) advising the Chairmancomposition and the Chief Executive Officer as toplanning for Board agenda items and meeting dates; (4) being a liaison between the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the Independent Directors; and (5) any other duties as requested by the Board, which include but are not limited to: approving information sent to the Board; approving meeting agendas for the Board; approving meeting schedules to assure adequate time for discussion of all agenda items; calling meetings of Independent Directors; and, if requested by major shareholders, ensuring that he is available for consultation and direct communication.succession.
Board and Committee Meetings
The Board of Directors held eight meetings during the year ended December 31, 2013.

The Board of Directors has determined that all Directors except Messrs. Kourkoumelis, Malone, Meisenbach, Wright, Yoshitani, Ms. PelletierMusser and Dr. Emmert,Wang are independent under the applicable independence standards set forth in the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Board has designated that only independent Directors can serve as Committee members.

The Board currently has the following Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance, Compensation and Audit. Each Committee operates under a written charter, all of which are available on our websitewww.investor.expeditors.com. The Board anticipates amending its Bylaws in 2016 to provide that a special meeting of the Board may be called by the Chairman of the Board, the CEO, or a majority of the Directors.

Board Practices & Procedures

The Board’s Committees analyze and review the Company’s activities in key areas such as financial reporting, internal controls over financial reporting, compliance with Company policies, corporate governance, significant risks, succession planning and executive compensation.

In 2013,The Board and its Committee Chairs review the agendas and matters to be considered in advance of each directormeeting. Each Board and Committee member is free to raise matters that are not on the agenda at any meeting and to suggest items for inclusion on future agendas.

Each Director is provided in advance with materials to be considered at every meeting of the Board and Committees and has the opportunity to provide comments and suggestions.

The Board and its Committees provide feedback to management and management answers questions raised by the Directors during Board and Committee meetings.

Independent Board and Committee members meet separately at each Board and Committee meeting and as otherwise needed.

Board Attendance

The Board met six times in 2015 and each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board of Directors meetings and Committee meetings of committees of the Board of Directors on which they served. While the Company has no established policy requiring directorsDirectors to attend the Annual Meeting, historically, and in 2013, all members, withbut one member attended the exception2015 Annual Meeting.

9    |    Notice of Mr. Malone, serving at the time were in attendance.

No members of management serve on any of the committees ofAnnual Meeting & Proxy Statement


BOARD OPERATIONS

Director Retirement Policy

In 2015, the Board of Directors. All committee members are Independent Directors.

Audit Committee
The Board of Directors hasestablished a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act which consists of Mr. Wright, Ms. Pelletier and Dr. Emmert. Mr. Wright was elected Chairman on May 6, 2009 and the Board of Directors has determined that he isDirector policy, whereby an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the NASDAQ independence standards applicableindividual Director will not be nominated to audit committee members.
The function of the Audit Committee is set forth in the Audit Committee Charter which can be found on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com. In general, these responsibilities include meeting with the internal financial and audit staff of the Company and members of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by the Company to review (i) the scope and findings of the annual audit and other procedures; (ii) quarterly and annual financial statements; (iii) accounting policies and procedures and the Company’s financial reporting; (iv) approve or ratify any related person transaction; and (v) the internal controls employed by the Company. The Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint, retain, determine funding for, and oversee the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also pre-approves all services to be provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

16



Compensation Committee
The Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee which consists of Messrs. Malone, Meisenbach and Wright. Mr. Meisenbach was elected Chairman on May 5, 2010. The Compensation Committee Charter can be found on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com.The function of the Compensation Committee includes (i) consultation with management in establishing the Company’s general policies relating to senior management compensation; (ii) overseeing the implementation of short and long-term compensation programs for senior management; (iii) ensuring that incentive compensation programs are consistent with the Company’s annual and long-term performance objectives and do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking by employees; and (iv) reviewing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors periodically with respect to the compensation of all Independent Directors, including compensation under the Company's equity-based plans. The Compensation Committee has been appointed by the Board of Directors to administer the Company’s stock option plans.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Board of Directors has a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which consists of Messrs. Kourkoumelis and Yoshitani, Dr. Emmert and Ms. Pelletier. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ("Nominating Committee") Charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com, states that the Nominating Committee will assist the Board of Directors by (i) identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors, and to recommend the director nominees for the election to be held at the next annual meeting of shareholders; (ii) identifying individuals qualified to become members in the event of a vacancy, and to recommend to the Board of Directors qualified individuals to fill any such vacancy; (iii) recommending to the Board of Directors, on an annual basis, director nominees for each Board of Directors committee; and (iv) providing a leadership role with respect to corporate governance of the Company.
Director Nomination Process
The Policy on Director Nominations, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com, describes the process by which director nominees are selected by the Nominating Committee, and includes the criteria the Nominating Committee will consider in determining the qualifications of any candidate for director. Among the qualifications, qualities and skills of a candidate considered important by the Nominating Committee are a candidate’s integrity, ethical character, business judgment, professional experience, expertise, and diversity in experiences and perspectives. Also of consideration and interest in director nominees are the experiences that personal diversity, including ethnicity, gender and education can add to the Board of Directors. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards. With respect to the nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered.
As a global company, our organization is comprised from top to bottom of people from diverse backgrounds, with nearly 14,000 employees worldwide, representing more than 60 countries. As a result, the Nominating Committee seeks director candidates with a wide diversity of business and professional experience, skills, gender and ethnic background, which when taken as a whole, will provide the necessary experience, background and leadership to oversee the Company. The Company believes the current nominees for the Board of Directors have considerable diversity in business backgrounds and education, as well as cultural, gender and ethnic diversity. As new Board positions are filled, the Nominating Committee will actively seek qualified candidates, including those within its current Board members’ community and professional networks, that might allow the Board to benefit from potentially different perspectives arising from further gender, ethnic and cultural diversity. In the event a search firm is utilized, the firm will be specifically instructed to actively seek qualified candidates with gender, ethnic and cultural diversity. The Nominating Committee annually reviews its nomination procedures to assess the effectiveness of the Policy on Director Nominations.
The Nominating Committee considers candidates for director who are recommended by its members, by management, and by search firms retained by the Nominating Committee. In addition, the Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates proposed by any single shareholder or group of shareholders that has beneficially owned more than five percent of the Company’s common stock for at least one year and that satisfies certain notice, information and

17



consent provisions in the Company’s Policy on Director Nominations (such individual or group, the “Qualified Stockholder”). In addition, a shareholder may nominate a candidatestand for election to the Board of Directors at the next Annual Meeting if the shareholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisionsDirector has reached an age of Article II of the Company’s Bylaws which can be found on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at www.sec.gov filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about December 23, 2013. As required by the Company’s Bylaws, the notice must be received by the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders called for the election of directors. However, if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the date of such annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.
The Nominating Committee evaluates all candidates, including incumbent directors,72 years. This policy became effective in accordance with the criteria described above and in the Policy on Director Nominations. All candidates for director who, after evaluation, are then recommended by the Nominating Committee and approved by2016.

In May 2016, John W. Meisenbach will retire from the Board of Directors will be included in the Company’s recommended slate of director nominees in its proxy statement.

Communications with the Board of Directors
Shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors and the procedures for doing so are located on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com. Information regarding the submission of comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters can be found in Section 1.18 of the Company's Code of Business Conduct on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2013 were: Messrs. Malone, Meisenbach and Wright for all of fiscal 2013; and Dr. Emmert and Mr. Yoshitani until May 1, 2013. No member of the Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of the Company and none had any interlocking relationships with any other entities of the type that would be required to be disclosed in this Proxy Statement.




PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Company’s bylaws require a Board of Directors composed of not less than six nor more than eleven members. A Board of Directors consisting of eleven directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until the election or qualification of his or her successor. Any vacancy resulting from the non-election of a director may be filled by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has unanimously approved the nominees named below. All nominees are members of the current Board of Directors.
Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections
The Company’s bylaws require that in an uncontested election each director will be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast. A majority of votes cast means that the number of shares cast “for” a director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director. A share which is otherwise present at the meeting but for which there is an abstention, or to which a shareholder gives no authority or direction, shall not be considered a vote cast.
In an uncontested election, a nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes cast will not be elected. An incumbent director who is not elected because he or she does not receive a majority vote will continue to serve as a holdover director until the earliest of: (a) 90 days after the date on which an inspector determines the voting results as to that director; (b) the date on which the Board of Directors appoints an individual to fill the office held by that director; or (c) the date of the director’s resignation. Under the Company’s resignation policy, any director who does not receive a majority vote in an uncontested election will resign immediately.
The Board may fill any vacancy resulting from the non-election of a director as provided in the Company’s bylaws. The Nominating Committee will consider promptly whether to fill the position of a nominee who fails to receive a majority vote in an uncontested election and may make a recommendation to the Board of Directors about filling the position. The Board will act on the Nominating Committee’s recommendation and within ninety (90) days after the certification of the shareholder vote will disclose publicly its decision. Except as provided in the next sentence, no director who fails to receive a majority vote for election will participate in the Nominating Committee recommendation or Board decision about filling his or her office. If no director receives a majority vote in an uncontested election, then the incumbent directors (a) will nominate a slate of directors and hold a special meeting for the purpose of electing those nominees as soon as practicable, and (b) may in the interim fill one or more positions with the same director(s) who will continue in office until their successors are elected.
Nominees
This year's nominees consist of seven independent directors, including the lead independent director, and four current and former management directors. Unless otherwise instructed, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote shares represented by properly executed proxies for the eleven nominees of the Board of Directors named below. Although the Board of Directors anticipates that all of the nominees will be available to serve as directors of the Company, should any one or more of them be unwilling or unable to serve, it is intended that the proxies will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board of Directors or the seat will remain open until the Board of Directors identifies a nominee.
All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company and the election and qualification of his or her successor or until the director's earlier death, resignation, removal or termination of term.
The following persons are nominated to serve as directors until the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Peter J. Rose has served as a director and Vice President of the Company since July 1981. Mr. Rose was elected a Senior Vice President of the Company in May 1986, Executive Vice President in May 1987, President and Chief Executive Officer in October 1988, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1991. Mr. Rose retired as Chief Executive officer effective March 1, 2014. He will remain as Chairman of the Board if elected until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in May of 2015. Mr. Rose’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his nearly 5024 years of experience in the international transportation industry and his many years of senior management and director experience.service. Mr. Rose is the father-in-law of Jeffrey S. Musser, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.
Robert R. Wright became a director of the Company in May 2008, was appointed Chair of the Audit Committee in May 2009 and Lead Director in May 2010. Since 2002, Mr. Wright has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Matthew G. Norton Co., a real estate investment, development and management firm based in Seattle, Washington. Prior to joining Matthew G. Norton, Mr. Wright was the Regional Managing Partner of Tax for Arthur Andersen and the Chief Financial Officer of Brinderson Ltd., a construction and real estate development company. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for two privately held companies, Matthew G. Norton Co. and Stimson Lumber Company. Mr. Wright’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his over 20 years of senior leadership and management experience with a focus on the areas of tax, finance and real estate, in private industry and the public accounting environment.
Mark A. Emmert became a director of the Company in May 2008. Since 2010 he has been President of the National Collegiate Athletic Association. From 2004 to 2010, Dr. Emmert served as the President of the University of Washington ("UW") and is now President Emeritus. Prior to the UW, he was chancellor of Louisiana State University. He also served as the chancellor of the University of Connecticut and held administrative and academic positions at the University of Colorado and Montana State University. Dr. Emmert is currently on the Board of Directors of the Weyerhaeuser Company and of Omnicare, Inc. and is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a Fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration. Dr. Emmert’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his many years of experience in the administration of educational and personnel development programs, as well as his expertise in the leadership and management of complex operations with rigid public oversight requirements, and international affairs.
R. Jordan Gates joined the Company as its Controller-Europe in February 1991. Mr. Gates was elected Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company in August 1994, Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in January 1998, Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in May 2000 and President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company in January 2008, Mr. Gates was also elected as a director in May 2000. Mr. Gates’ qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his over 20 years of experience in the international transportation industry, primarily in accounting, finance and operations, and his many years of senior management and director experience.
Dan P. Kourkoumelis became a director of the Company in March 1993. From 1967 through 1998, Mr. Kourkoumelis was employed in various positions by Quality Food Centers, Inc., a supermarket chain, and became a member of its Board of Directors in April 1991. He was appointed Executive Vice President in 1983 and Chief Operating Officer in 1987, President in 1989 and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1996 to September 1998. Mr. Kourkoumelis is a member of the Board of Directors of the Western Association of Food Chains. Mr. Kourkoumelis’ qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his over 20 years of senior leadership, financial and management experience in a public corporation environment with a primary focus on providing superior customer service.
Michael J. Malone has been a director of the Company since August 1999. Mr. Malone is the retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AEI/DMX Music, a $150 million, multinational music programming and distribution company that he founded in 1971 and subsequently sold via merger to Liberty Media, Inc. in May 2001. From the May 2001 merger through February 7, 2005, Mr. Malone served as Chairman of Maxide Acquisition, Inc., the holding company for DMX Music, Inc. and a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation. Mr. Malone currently has interests in several premium hotels and restaurants, including the Sorrento Hotel. He is also currently Principal of Hunters Capital, LLC, a Northwest Real Estate Development and Management Company. Mr. Malone is a member of the Board of Directors of HomeStreet Bank. Mr. Malone’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his entrepreneurial skills, as well as his over 20 years of senior leadership and management experience with international operations in a business driven by customer service.
John W. Meisenbach became a directorDirector of the Company in November 1991 and was appointed Chair of the Compensation Committee in May 2010. Since August of 2010, Mr. Meisenbach has been the Chairman of the Board for MCM, a financial services company. Prior to being Chairman, Mr. Meisenbach was the President of MCM from 1962 to December 2008 and Chief Executive Officer from December 2008 to February 2013. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Costco Wholesale Corporation,Corporation.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Senior management is responsible for the assessment and day-to-day management of risk and brings to the attention of the Board the material risks to the Company. The Board provides oversight and guidance to management regarding the material risks. The Board strengthened its approach to enterprise risk oversight in 2015 and assigned oversight responsibilities for specific areas of risk to its three standing Committees. The Board and its Committees regularly discuss with management the Company’s strategies, operations, compliance, policies and inherent associated risks in order to assess appropriate levels of risk taking and steps taken to monitor, mitigate and control such exposures. The Board believes the Company’s risk management processes are appropriate and that the active oversight role played by the Board and its Committees provides the appropriate level of oversight for the Company.

Director Compensation Program

The Board uses a wholesale membership storecombination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. In setting Director compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the amount of time that Directors expend in fulfilling their duties as well as the skill-level required as members of the Board and its Committees.

In 2014, the shareholders approved the 2014 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, which authorized 250,000 shares of stock for issuance to eligible Director. Under this Plan, each eligible Director annually receives $200,000 worth of Expeditors restricted stock and such shares vest immediately upon grant. As of December 31, 2015, there are 185,450 shares remaining for issuance under this plan.

 Board of Directors’ Annual Compensation & Stock Ownership Requirements

Board Retainer

$30,000 in cash.

Board Meeting & Attendance

$1,000 per day for attending a meeting or performing operational reviews.

Board Chair Retainer

An additional $150,000 retainer is paid to the Chair of the Board.

Board Committee Chair Retainer

An additional retainer is paid to the Chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of $20,000, $15,000 and $12,500, respectively.

Restricted Stock Plan

Each non-management Director receives $200,000 worth of the Company’s stock. All shares are fully vested at time of issuance.

Stock Ownership Policy

Each independent director is required to accumulate a minimum of 15,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock over a six-year period from the date first elected to the Board or the policy adoption date.

Beginning in May 2016, Board meeting fees will be eliminated. The annual Board retainer will increase to $65,000; the Board Chair retainer will increase to $175,000; the Audit Committee Chair will increase to $25,000; and the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairs will each increase to $20,000.

10    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


BOARD OPERATIONS

Director Summary Compensation Table for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to non-employee Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:

  Name 

Fees Earned or  

Paid in Cash  

 

Stock    

Awards (1)    

 

Option    

Awards    

 

Non-Equity    

Incentive Plan    

Compensation    

 

All Other    

Compensation    

 Total   

 

Robert R. Wright

 

 $            192,000   199,999     —     —     —     $391,999  

 

Mark A. Emmert

 

 $              56,000   199,999     —     —     —     $255,999  

 

Diane H. Gulyas(2)

 

 $              17,000   —     —     —     —     $17,000  

 

Dan P. Kourkoumelis(3)

 

 $              42,000   199,999     —     —     —     $241,999  

 

Michael J. Malone(3)

 

 $              41,000   199,999     —     —     —     $240,999  

 

John W. Meisenbach

 

 $              38,000   199,999     —     —     —     $237,999  

 

Richard B. McCune

 

 $              70,000   199,999     —     —     —     $269,999  

 

James L.K. Wang(4)

 

 $              29,000   —     —     —     —     $29,000  

 

Liane J. Pelletier

 

 $              54,500   199,999     —     —     —     $254,499  

 

Tay Yoshitani

 

 $              41,000   199,999     —     —     —     $      240,999  

(1)This column represents the aggregate fair value of restricted shares issued in 2015. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the fair market value of the Company’s shares of Common Stock on the date of award. These restricted shares vested immediately upon award.

(2)Ms. Gulyas joined the Board on November 3, 2015.

(3)Prior to 2008, each independent Director received a stock option grant of 32,000 shares at the closing market price on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2015, Messrs. Kourkoumelis and Malone each held 64,000 vested option awards.

(4)Mr. Wang received fees after he ceased to be an employee on July 1, 2015.

11    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMMUNICATING WITH OUR

SHAREHOLDERS

Shareholder Engagement

We seek our shareholders’ views on governance and compensation matters throughout the year. Management provides regular updates concerning shareholder feedback to the Board, which considers shareholder perspectives along with the interests of all stakeholders when overseeing company strategy, formulating governance practices, and designing compensation programs.

In 2015 we expanded our investor communications efforts and reached out to shareholders representing nearly 60% of our shares outstanding to discuss matters related to our strategies, compensation programs, governance and/or operations.

Management welcomes the opportunity to engage with our investors who express a desire to visit our corporate offices during the period after quarterly earnings releases when we are not in a quiet period. Of course this would have to be scheduled around our meetings with customers, service providers and visiting district operations and employees.

Communicating with the Board of Directors

Shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors and the procedures for doing so are located on the Company’s website atwww.investor.expeditors.com. Any matter intended for the Board of Directors, or for one or more individual members, should be directed to the Company’s Secretary at 1015 Third Avenue, 12th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98104, with a request to forward the same to the intended recipient(s). All shareholder communication delivered to the Company’s Secretary for forwarding to the Board of Directors or specified members will be forwarded in accordance with the instructions received.

Information regarding the submission of comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters can be found in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct on the Company’s website atwww.investor.expeditors.com.

Information Requests

We ask that all requests for corporate information concerning Expeditors’ operations be submitted in writing. This policy applies equally to securities analysts and current and potential shareholders. Requests can be made to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., 1015 Third Avenue, 12th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98104 Attention: Chief Financial Officer, by faxing the request to 206-674-3459, or by email toinvestor@expeditors.com.

Written responses to selected inquiries will be released to the public by a posting on our website atwww.investor.expeditors.com and by simultaneous filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under Item 7.01 on Form 8-K.

Fair Disclosure

Any other analyst or investor contact, whether by telephone or in person, will be conducted with the understanding that questions directed at ongoing operations will not be discussed. Management will limit responses to discussions of previously disclosed information, including informational discussions directed to the history and operating philosophy of the Company and an understanding of the global logistics industry and its competitive environment. Expeditors will, of course, make public disclosures at other times as required by law or commercial necessity.

12    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP

INFORMATION

Five Percent Owners of Company Stock

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2015, with respect to all shareholders known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding Common Stock. Except as noted below, each entity has sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to the shares shown.

  Name & Complete Mailing Address

Number of
Shares

Percent of Common
Stock Outstanding

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355

16,916,274  (1)9.07%

Loomis Sayles & Co., L.P.

One Financial Center, Boston, MA 02111

11,965,802  (2)6.42%

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022

11,436,091  (3)6.10%

Fiduciary Management, Inc.

100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2200, Milwaukee, WI 53202

10,092,958  (4)5.41%

State Street Corporation

State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111

9,584,778  (5)5.10%

(1)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2015, according to Schedule 13G/A dated February 10, 2016 filed by The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser. The Vanguard Group reports that it has sole voting power with respect to 342,550 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 16,540,124 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 18,100 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power of 376,150 shares of Common Stock.

(2)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2015, according to Schedule 13G dated February 12, 2016 filed by Loomis Sayles & Co., L.P. Loomis Sayles reports that it has sole voting power with respect to 6,707,477 shares of Common Stock.

(3)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2015, according to Schedule 13G/A dated February 10, 2016 filed by BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company. BlackRock, Inc. reports that it has sole voting power with respect to 9,796,842 shares of Common Stock.

(4)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2015, according to Schedule 13G/A dated February 16, 2016 filed by Fiduciary Management, Inc., an investment adviser. Fiduciary Management, Inc. reports that is has sole voting power with respect to 9,356,422 shares of Common Stock.

(5)The holding shown is as of December 31, 2015, according to Schedule 13G dated February 12, 2016 filed by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation reports that it has shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 9,584,778 shares of Common Stock.

13    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Security Ownership of Directors & Executive Officers

The following table lists the names and the amount and nature of the beneficial ownership of Common Stock of each Director and nominee, of each of the NEO described in the Summary Compensation Table, and all Directors and Executive Officers as a group at March 8, 2016. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to the shares shown.

  Name

  Amount & Nature of    

  Beneficial Ownership    

    Percent of Class      

Directors & Nominees:

Robert R. Wright

28,922                *

James M. DuBois

—                *

Mark A. Emmert

15,849                *

Diane H. Gulyas

—                *

Dan P. Kourkoumelis(1)

115,830                *

Michael J. Malone(2)

195,303                *

Richard B. McCune

4,231                *

John W. Meisenbach(3)

172,328                *

Jeffrey S. Musser(4)

179,779                *

Liane J. Pelletier

13,741                *

James L.K. Wang

512,246                *

Tay Yoshitani

13,741                *

Additional Named Executives Officers:

Eugene K. Alger(5)

63,168                *

Philip M. Coughlin(6)

97,600                *

Bradley S. Powell(7)

55,618                *

Daniel R. Wall(8)

75,468                *

All Directors & Executive Officers as a group (18 persons)(9)

1,579,812                *

*Less than 1%

(1)Includes 64,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(2)Includes 64,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(3)Includes 64,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(4)Includes 142,838 shares held in trust for which Mr. Musser maintains voting and dispositive authority and 31,750 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(5)Includes 25,510 shares held in trust for which Mr. Alger maintains voting and dispositive authority and 25,625 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(6)Includes 25,625 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(7)Includes 51,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(8)Includes 35,375 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.

(9)Includes 388,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days. No Director or Executive Officer has pledged Company stock.

14    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company’s Directors, certain of its officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes of ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the SEC and NASDAQ. Officers, Directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms they file.

Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by the Company, and on written representations by the Company’s officers and Directors regarding their compliance with the filing requirements, the Company believes that all reports required from certain of its officers, Directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were filed on a timely basis during 2015.

SEC Filings & Reports

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, are available free of charge on our website atwww.investor.expeditors.com under the heading “Investor Relations” (see “SEC Filings”) immediately after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC.

15    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


NOMINATING & CORPORATE

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is committed to strong corporate governance policies and procedures designed to make the Board and its Committees more effective in exercising their oversight roles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our websitewww.investor.expeditors.com.

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

All members are independent under Exchange Act and NASDAQ rules.

Committee Members:Key Responsibilities:

Liane Pelletier, Chair

•    Determine the criteria for Board membership

Mark Emmert

•    Lead the search for qualified individuals to become Board members

Dan Kourkoumelis

•    Recommend the composition of the Board and its Committees

•    Monitor and evaluate changes in Board members’ professional status

•    Conduct evaluations of Board and Committee effectiveness

•    Maintain a set of Corporate Governance Principles

•    Maintain the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and oversee its compliance

•    Assist in evaluating governance-related inquiries, commentary and proposals

•    Analyze current and emerging governance trends for impact on the Company

•    Oversee enterprise risks assigned to Committee by the Board

2015 Committee Highlights

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met 5 times in 2015. The Committee seeks to enhance Expeditors’ corporate governance by continually refining corporate governance policies, procedures and practices. The following changes were made in 2015 to strengthen our governance posture:

Executed Director Succession Plan to address expected retirements over the next several years, enhance Board skills and address tenure with such action including:

-Appointment of Diane Gulyas to the Board in November 2015

-Nomination of James “Jim” DuBois to the Board slate in this proxy, selected from a list of qualified candidates identified by a third party search firm

Enhanced shareholder rights by recommending for shareholder approval a bylaw amendment to implement proxy access

Updated the Code of Business Conduct

Invested in continuous Board education

16    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


NOMINATING & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

Key Nominating & Corporate Governance Policies & Practices

The Committee operates according to the following key corporate governance policies and practices:

Key Corporate Governance Policies

•    The Company is committed to the highest standards of legal and ethical business conduct; the Company’s Code of Business Conduct is available atwww.investor.expeditors.com

•    Annual election of all Directors

•    Each Director must be elected by a majority of votes cast, not a plurality

•    Independent Board Chair

•    The majority of the Board is comprised of independent Directors

•    Each of the three Board Committees is made up of only independent Directors; each Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board

•    Any Board action must be approved by a majority of the independent Directors

•    Each of the three Committees has the authority to retain independent advisors

•    The Board and each Committee evaluates its performance

•    No shareholder rights plan (“poison pill”)

•    No pledging, hedging or engaging in any derivatives trading of Company shares

Key Considerations for Director Nominations

•    The highest level of integrity, ethical character and the ability to exercise sound business judgment on a broad range of issues consistent with the Company’s values

•    Financial literacy and sound understanding of business strategy, corporate governance and Board operations

•    Capability to represent the multi-cultural nature of our global corporation with consideration to diversity of gender, ethnicity, professional experience, skills and background

•    Independent Directors should be truly independent in thought and judgment to represent the long-term interests of all shareholders and be free of interests or affiliations that could give rise to a biased approach or a conflict of interest

•    Significant experience and proven superior performance in professional endeavors

•    Value Board and team performance over individual performance, demonstrate respect for others and facilitate superior Board performance

•    Willingness and ability to devote the time required to become familiar with the Company’s business and to be actively involved in the Board and its decision-making

•    Specific expertise in one or more of the following areas: industry knowledge, strategy, international business, information technology, sales and marketing, management, compensation, corporate governance, accounting and finance

•    Ability and commitment to serve on the Board for multiple years and act in a manner consistent with a Director’s duties of loyalty and care

17    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


NOMINATING & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

Director Identification & Nomination Process

The Policy on Director Nominations, which can be found on the Company’s website atwww.investor.expeditors.com, describes the process by which Director nominees are selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and includes the criteria the Committee will consider in determining the qualifications of any candidate for Director. In reviewing candidates for the Board, the Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards. With respect to the nomination of continuing Directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered.

The Committee annually reviews its nomination procedures to assess the effectiveness of the Policy on Director Nominations. The Committee considers candidates for Director who are recommended by its members, by management, and by search firms retained by the Committee. In addition, the Committee will evaluate candidates proposed by any single shareholder or group of shareholders that has beneficially owned more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock for at least one year and that satisfies certain notice, information and consent provisions in the Company’s Policy on Director Nominations (such individual or group, the “Qualified Stockholder”). In addition, a shareholder may nominate a candidate for election to the Board of Directors if the shareholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisions of Article II of the Company’s Bylaws which can be found on our website atwww.investor.expeditors.com.

In this Proxy Statement the Board is asking shareholders to approve a proxy access amendment to the Company Bylaws. If approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the requirements for shareholders to nominate a Director candidates would change to those described in Proposal 5 and Appendix C.

Our Bylaws require this notice to be submitted by certain deadlines which are explained in detail under the heading “Deadlines for Shareholder Proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders”.

All candidates for Director who, after evaluation, are then recommended by the Committee and approved by the Board of Directors will be included in the Company’s recommended slate of Director nominees in its Proxy Statement.

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee:

Liane Pelletier, Chair

Mark Emmert

Dan Kourkoumelis

18    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 1:

ELECTION OF 11 DIRECTORS

The Company’s Bylaws require a Board of Directors composed of not less than 6 nor more than 11 members. Expeditors’ Directors are elected at each Annual Meeting to hold office until the next Annual Meeting or until the election or qualification of his or her successor. Any vacancy resulting from the non-election of a Director may be filled by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has unanimously approved the nominees named below. All nominees other than Mr. DuBois are members of the current Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Board’s retirement policy, Mr. Meisenbach was not nominated to stand for election to the Board.

Majority Vote Standard for Director Elections

The Company’s Bylaws require that in an uncontested election each Director will be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast. A majority of votes cast means that the number of shares cast “for” a Director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that Director. A share which is otherwise present at the meeting but for which there is an abstention, or to which a shareholder gives no authority or direction, shall not be considered a vote cast.

In an uncontested election, a nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes cast will not be elected. An incumbent Director who is not elected because he or she does not receive a majority vote will continue to serve as a holdover Director until the earliest of: (a) 90 days after the date on which an inspector determines the voting results as to that Director; (b) the date on which the Board of Directors appoints an individual to fill the position held by that Director; or (c) the date of the Director’s resignation. Under the Company’s resignation policy, any Director who does not receive a majority vote in an uncontested election will resign immediately.

The Board may fill any vacancy resulting from the non-election of a Director as provided in the Company’s Bylaws. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider promptly whether to fill the position of a nominee who fails to receive a majority vote in an uncontested election and may make a recommendation to the Board of Directors about filling the position. The Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and within 90 days after the certification of the shareholder vote will disclose publicly its decision. Except as provided in the next sentence, no Director who fails to receive a majority vote for election will participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommendation or Board decision about filling his or her office. If no Director receives a majority vote in an uncontested election, then the incumbent Directors: (a) will nominate a slate of Directors and hold a special meeting for the purpose of electing those nominees as soon as practicable; and (b) may in the interim fill one or more positions with the same Director(s) who will continue in office until their successors are elected.

19    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF 11 DIRECTORS

LOGO

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
Summary of Director Experience,
Qualifications, Attributes & Skills
Operations
Transportation Industry
International
Financial
Sales & Marketing Information Technology
Leadership & Strategy
Governance/Business Conduct/Legal
Planned Committee Membership
Nominating & Coporate Governance Compensation
Audit
Additional Information
Age Tenure
Other Public Company Boards
Wright
DuBois
Emmert
Gulyas
Kourkoumelis
Malone
McCune
Pelletier Yoshitani Musser
Wang
56 52 63 59 65 71 70 58 69 50 67
7 0 7 0 23 16 1 3 3 2 27
0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

20    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF 11 DIRECTORS

Nominees for Election

This year’s nominees consist of nine independent Directors and two non-independent Directors. Unless otherwise instructed, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote shares represented by properly executed proxies for the 11 nominees of the Board of Directors named below. Although the Board anticipates that all of the nominees will be available to serve as Directors of the Company, should any one or more of them be unwilling or unable to serve, it is intended that the proxies will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board of Directors or the seat will remain open until the Board of Directors identifies a nominee.

The following persons are nominated to serve as Directors until the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

Robert R. Wright

Robert R. Wright became a Director of the Company in May 2008, served as Lead Director from May 2010 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in May 2014. Since 2002, Mr. Wright has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Matthew G. Norton Co., a real estate investment, development and management firm based in Seattle, Washington. Prior to joining Matthew G. Norton, Mr. Wright was a Regional Managing Partner of Tax for Arthur Andersen.

He currently serves on the Board of Directors for two privately held companies, Matthew G. Norton Co. and Stimson Lumber Company.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

Over 20 years of senior leadership and management in private industry and the public accounting environment.

Expertise in tax, finance and real estate.

James M. DuBois

James “Jim” DuBois is Corporate Vice President and Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) at Microsoft Corporation. He is responsible for the company’s global security, infrastructure, IT messaging, and business applications. Mr. DuBois was appointed CIO January 2014 after serving as interim CIO since May 2013. Mr. DuBois has served various other roles in Microsoft IT since joining the company in 1993. These roles include leading IT teams for application development, infrastructure and service management. He also served as Microsoft’s Chief Information Security Officer and spent several years living in Asia and then Europe learning the Microsoft field business while running the respective regional IT teams. Before joining Microsoft, Mr. DuBois worked for Accenture, focusing on financial and distribution systems.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

Extensive information technology experience.

Experience overseeing investments in technology to support business objectives.

Expertise in cyber-security.

Experience leading global IT teams.

21    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF 11 DIRECTORS

Mark A. Emmert

Mark A. Emmert became a Director of the Company in May 2008. Since 2010 he has been President of the National Collegiate Athletic Association. From 2004 to 2010, Dr. Emmert served as the President of the University of Washington (“UW”) and is now President Emeritus. Prior to the UW, he was chancellor of Louisiana State University. He also served as the chancellor of the University of Connecticut and held administrative and academic positions at the University of Colorado and Montana State University. Dr. Emmert is a Life Member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a Fellow of the National Academy for Public Administration, and a former Fulbright Fellow.

Dr. Emmert is currently on the Board of Directors of the Weyerhaeuser Company.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

Many years of experience in the administration of educational and personnel development programs.

Expertise in the leadership and management of complex operations with rigid public oversight requirements.

Expertise in international affairs.

Diane H. Gulyas

Diane H. Gulyas became a Director of the Company in November 2015. Ms. Gulyas worked for DuPont from 1978 until her retirement as President of their $4 billion global Performance Polymers business in September of 2014. During her 36-year career at DuPont, Ms. Gulyas served also as Chief Marketing and Sales Officer, President of Electronic and Communication Technologies Platform, and President of the Advanced Fibers divisions. Ms. Gulyas’ qualifications to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors include over 36 years of senior leadership and global business expertise.

Ms. Gulyas is currently on the Board of Directors of Mallinckrodt PLC and W.R. Grace & Company.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

More than 36 years of senior leadership and global business expertise.

Substantial and varied management experience and strong skills in engineering, manufacturing (domestic and international), marketing and sales and distribution.

Governance and oversight experience from service as a senior executive of a public company and prior service on a public company board.

Dan P. Kourkoumelis

Dan P. Kourkoumelis became a Director of the Company in March 1993. From 1967 through 1998, Mr. Kourkoumelis was employed in various positions by Quality Food Centers, Inc., a supermarket chain, and M became a member of its Board of Directors in April 1991. He was appointed Executive Vice President in 1983 and Chief Operating Officer in 1987, President in 1989 and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1996 to September 1998.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

More than 20 years of senior leadership.

Financial Holdings,and management experience in a financial services organization.public corporation environment with a primary focus on providing superior customer service.

Past positions as Director, committee chairman and member of audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees of various public and private company boards.

22    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF 11 DIRECTORS

Michael J. Malone

Michael J. Malone has been a Director of the Company since August 1999. Mr. MeisenbachMalone is the retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AEI/DMX Music, a multinational music programming and distribution company that he founded in 1971 and subsequently sold via merger to Liberty Media, Inc. in May 2001. From the May 2001 merger through February 2005, Mr. Malone served as Chairman of Maxide Acquisition, Inc., the holding company for DMX Music, Inc. and a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation.

He is also currently Principal of Hunters Capital, LLC, a Northwest Real Estate Development and Management Company and is a member of the Board of Directors of the American Foundation for Chess; a trustee of Seattle Children’s Hospital Foundation, a child health care and pediatric center; and a trustee emeriti of Seattle University, a private university. He is active in numerous industry and civic organizations including the United Way of King County; Global Partnerships; Medical Teams International; and Zion Preparatory Academy. Mr. Meisenbach’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his over 40Liberty Trip Advisors, Inc.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

Entrepreneurial skills.

More than 20 years of senior leadership and management experience with international operations in a business driven by customer service.

Richard B. McCune

Richard B. McCune became a Director of the customer oriented financial services industry, including venture capital, employee benefitsCompany in August of 2014. Prior to that, Mr. McCune was a Partner at KPMG LLP from 2002 to May 2009 and business financing.Partner at Arthur Andersen LLP from 1983 to 2002.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

More than 30 years of senior leadership and management experience.

Extensive audit and accounting experience.

Served as Lead Audit Partner on several publicly-traded companies.

International experience as KPMG’s U.S. Accounting Expert in Amsterdam from 2003 to 2006.

Jeffrey S. Musser

Jeffrey S. Musser joined the Company in February 1983 and was promoted to District Manager in October 1989. Mr. Musser was elected to Regional Vice President in September 1999, Senior Vice President-Chief Information Officer in January 2005 and to Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer in May 2009. Mr. Musser assumed the role asof Director, President and Chief Executive Officer in March of 2014. Mr. Musser’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his nearly 31

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

Over 30 years of experience in the international transportation industry and his manyindustry.

Many years of corporate leadership responsibilities combined with his backgroundresponsibilities.

Background in the information technology discipline. Mr. Musser is the son-in-law to Peter J. Rose, the Company’s current Chairman

23    |    Notice of the Board.

Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF 11 DIRECTORS

Liane J. Pelletier

Liane J. Pelletier became a Director of the Company in May 2013. Ms. Pelletier is the former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Alaska Communications Systems, an Alaska based integrated communicationtelecommunication and information technology services provider, leading the firm from October 2003 to April 2011. From November 1986 to October 2003, Ms. Pelletier held a number of executive positions at Sprint Corporation, (now known as Sprint Nextel Corporation), a United States based wireless communicationstelecommunications company. Ms. Pelletier is a member of the Board of Directors of Washington Federal, Atlantic Tele-NetworkTele-Network. She is also President of the Northwest Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) and Icicle Seafoods. Ms. Pelletier's qualifications to serve on thealso is credentialed as a NACD Board of Directors include her overFellow.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

More than 25 years of senior leadership and management experience in the telecommunications industry, including pastindustry.

Past and current positions as Chairman, Lead Independentchair, lead independent Director, and member of Audit, Risk, Nominatingaudit, risk, nominating and Compensation Committees; and her status as compensation committees of various company boards.

Board Leadership Fellow Credential of the National Association of Corporate Directors. Both her corporateDirectors and Northwest Chapter President.

Engages in continuous education on information technology and security as well as leading governance practices.

Corporate career and her board service spanspans firms where there is material focus on regulation, information technology and security, foreign operations and customer service.

James L.K. Wang

In 2015, James L.K. Wang hasretired as President-Asia Pacific. Previously he had served as a director and the Managing Director of Expeditors International Taiwan Ltd., the Company’s former exclusive Taiwan agent, since September 1981. In October 1988,Mr. Wang is one of the founders of Expeditors International. He was elected President-Asia in May 2000. Previous he served as Director-Far East, and as Executive Vice President. Mr. Wang became a directorDirector of the Company and its Director-Far East, and Executive Vice President in January 1996. In May 2000, Mr. Wang was elected President-Asia Pacific. Mr. Wang’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his nearlyOctober 1988.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

Nearly 40 years of experience in the international transportation industry, primarily in Asia, and his manyAsia.

Many years of senior management and directorDirector experience.

Tay Yoshitani

Tay Yoshitani became a directorDirector of the Company in August of 2012. SinceFrom March of 2007 to December 2014 he has beenwas the Chief Executive Officer of the Port of Seattle.Seattle which owns and operates both the Seattle Seaport and SeaTac International Airport. From 2004 to 2007, he served as the Senior Advisor to the National Association of Waterfront Employers and from 2001 to 2004, was the Executive Director of the Port of Oakland.Oakland overseeing both the Seaport and Oakland International Airport. Prior to that he was the Executive Director for the Port of Baltimore. Baltimore and the Chief Deputy at the Port of Los Angeles.

He is currently the Chairman of thehas been an active Board member of the American Association of Port Authorities. Mr. Yoshitani is a graduate of United States Military Academy,Authorities and served five years, which included service in Vietnam withas the Corps of Engineers, in the US Army and retired with the rank of Captain.Chairman during 2014. He also has an MBA from Harvard Business School. He currently serves on the BoardsBoard of the Eno Center for Transportation, the Seattle Foundation and on the boards of a number of other local Seattle civic and trade-related organizations. Mr. Yoshitani’s qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors include his overTransportation.

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills & Experience

More than 20 years of senior leadership and management experience in the ocean transportation industry and overindustry.

More than 10 years of experience in airport operations.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

18

LOGO

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFORthe election of each of the Director nominees

24    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement




AUDITCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The AuditCompensation Committee was establishedbelieves in 1984 by actionsimple, easy to understand executive incentive compensation plans that are directly aligned with Company performance and focus management on enhancing the long-term value of the Board of Directors.Company. The function of the Audit Committee is set forth in an AuditCompensation Committee Charter (the “Audit Charter”)is available on our websitewww.investor.expeditors.com.

Compensation Committee

All members are independent under Exchange Act and can be found on the Company’s website at www.expeditors.com.

Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, selected each year by the AuditNASDAQ rules.

Committee Members:Key Responsibilities:

Mark Emmert, Chair

Recommend compensation of executive officers

John Meisenbach

Tay Yoshitani

Approve the annual and long-term performance goals for the Company’s incentive plans

Annually review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation, annually evaluate CEO performance in light of those goals and objectives, and recommend CEO compensation based on that evaluation

Ensure that incentive compensation programs are consistent with the Company’s annual and long-term performance objectives and do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking

Determine base salary, participation level in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and stock option grants to the CEO

Review and recommend compensation of non-management Directors

Oversee enterprise risks assigned to Committee by the Board

Compensation Committee is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and for issuing reports thereon. As described in the Audit Charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibility is generally to monitor and oversee these processes. EachInterlocks & Insider Participation

No member of the Audit Committee was and is independent of management according to both the letter and spirit of the applicable rules.

In addition to its other responsibilities under the Audit Charter, the Audit Committeeor has reviewed and discussed with managementbeen an officer or employee of the Company and none had any interlocking relationship with any other entities or of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013, the matterstype that would be required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended, as adopteddisclosed in this Proxy Statement.

2015 Committee Highlights

The Compensation Committee met 4 times in 2015. The following are the significant matters addressed by the PCAOB. In addition,Committee as a result of say-on-pay votes and feedback from shareholders in 2015:

Reviewed feedback from shareholders on executive compensation

Hired a compensation consulting firm in November 2015 to assist in evaluating potential future changes to our executive compensation programs

Continued to shift compensation mix from cash to equity for NEO

Continued to increase the Auditnumber of participants in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan to further align those employees with shareholders, while maintaining the same Bonus Pool percentage of operating income

25    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Shareholder Feedback Following the 2014 and 2015 Say-On-Pay Votes

What We Heard & How We Responded

The Compensation Committee has received from KPMGconsidered the written disclosures and the letter required by the PCAOB regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with KPMG the auditor’s independencevoting results from the Company and its management.

Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the Company thatlast two year’s say-on-pay vote in reviewing the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included incompensation programs and policies. In 2014 we failed our say on pay vote with 44% of shareholders voting for NEO compensation. In 2015 we passed our “say on pay” vote with 67% of shareholders voting for NEO compensation. After the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Robert R. Wright, Chairman
Mark A. Emmert
Liane J. Pelletier
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Historically, the Company has used a combination of cash2015 and stock-based incentive2014 votes, we continued our dialogue with our shareholders to better understand their concerns and to develop appropriate and timely responses. We believe that our executive compensation programs have always been designed appropriately to attract and retain qualified candidatesexecutives who can lead Expeditors and continue our long-term track record of profitability, growth and long-term value creation. After listening to serve on the Board. On June 1, 2007, all remaining stock options authorized under the 1993 Directors’ Stock Option Plan were granted to the independent non-management members of the Company’s Board of Directors. On May 7, 2008, the shareholders approved the 2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan and on June 1, 2013, the plan terminated. In setting director compensation, the Company considers the amount of time that Directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the skill-level required as members of the Board and its Committees.
Cash Compensation Paid to Board Members
In 2013, members of the Board who are not employees of the Company were entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $30,000 and $1,000 per day for attending meetingsshareholder feedback and performing operational reviews. Mr. Wright was paid an additional retainer of $75,000 for his role as Lead Director. Annual cash retainers, or a pro-rata amount, are paid atfurther analysis, we implemented the first Board meeting following election or appointment to the Board. Effective immediately after thechanges in 2014 Annual Meeting, the Lead Director retainer will be reduced to $50,000 and an annual retainer will be paid to the Chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of $25,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively.
2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan
The 2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan was only for the benefit of the independent non-management directors. Each independent non-management director received $200,000 worth of the Company’s restricted stock on June 1st of each year. The stock vested ratably over 12 months and dividends were forfeited until all shares for that grant year had been fully vested. On June 1, 2013, each Independent Director elected at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders received 5,124 shares with a fair value of $39.03 per share. The taxation ramifications for the issuance of these shares were the sole responsibility of each outside director. The 2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan terminated on June 1, 2013.
2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan
If approved by the shareholders, the 2014 Directors' Stock Grant Plan will be solely for the benefit of the Independent Directors. Each Independent Director receives $200,000 worth of the Company's stock on May 20th of each year. All shares are expected to be fully vested at time of grant. The taxation ramifications for the issuance of these shares are the sole responsibility of each Independent Director.
Stock Option Program
Prior to 2008, on June 1st of each year, each Independent Director received a stock option grant of 32,000 shares at the closing market price on the date of grant. Until an option is exercised, shares subject to options cannot be voted and do not receive dividends or dividend equivalents.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
On February 24, 2014, the Board adopted a policy regarding Director stock ownership guidelines. These stock ownership guidelines are applicable to the Company’s Independent Directors and are designed to increase Directors’ equity stakes in the Company. The guidelines require Independent Directors to accumulate a minimum of 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over a six-year period from the date elected to the Board or the policy adoption date. This policy excludes stock option grants from the ownership calculation. This policy is governed by the Compensation Committee.
Director Summary Compensation Table for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to Independent Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Name 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
 
Stock
Awards(1)
 
Option
Awards
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 
All Other
Compensation
 Total
Mark A. Emmert $39,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $238,990
Dan P. Kourkoumelis(2) $38,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $237,990
Michael J. Malone(2) $38,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $237,990
John W. Meisenbach(2) $38,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $237,990
Liane J. Pelletier $39,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $238,990
Robert R. Wright $115,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $314,990
Tay Yoshitani $38,000
 199,990
 
 
 
 $237,990
___________________
2015.

(1)

What We Heard

This column represents

How We Responded

The retirement bonus paid to outgoing CEO and Co-Founder was viewed as excessive.

In 2014, we adopted a policy that prohibits the aggregate grant date fair valuepayment of restricted shares grantedany future retirement bonuses to senior management.

NEO incentive cash compensation was perceived as too large in 2013. The fair valuerelation to recent growth.

In 2014, we decreased the overall allocation of restrictedcash compensation to NEO under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan by 18% and continued to add more participants to this plan.

In 2015, no NEO received an increase in their percent allocation of the Bonus Pool, except Mr. Wall, who was promoted to President – Global Products in 2015. We also further decreased the overall allocation of cash compensation to NEO under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan by 3% and continued to add more participants to this plan.

See further discussion of these changes inCompensation Discussion and Analysis.

Equity should represent a larger component of overall NEO compensation.

In 2014 and 2015, we increased the mix of NEO stock option awards relative to cash.

Realized compensation to the NEO is based ononly achieved if the fair market value of the Company’s sharesCompany increases over the long-term. See further discussion of common stock on the date of grant. Each Independent Director holds 2,135 unvested restricted shares.

these changes inCompensationDiscussion and Analysis.

(2)

There should be a cap on NEO cash compensation.

In 2014, we instituted a cap on increases in NEO and other senior management incentive cash compensation at 115% of the highest amount earned by that individual in the 3 prior comparable quarters.

In 2015, we achieved the highest level of operating income in our history, which was 121% of 2014. As designed, NEO compensation was capped, which reduced their total non-equity compensation by $1 million.

The compensation “clawback policy” should be more comprehensive.

In 2014, we expanded our “ clawback policy” under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act related to financial restatements to include not just the CEO and CFO, but all members of December 31, 2013 there were 128,000, 96,000 and 64,000 vested option awards held by Messrs. Kourkoumelis, Malone and Meisenbach, respectively.senior management.


26    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
TheResponse to Proxy Advisory Firm Feedback

In 2015, certain proxy advisory firms recommended a vote against our say-on-pay proposal. We believe their concerns were based on faulty premises, falling generally into two buckets.

First, these firms perceived a misalignment between our executive compensation and stock performance. One firm, for instance, in its Pay for Performance evaluation, included our former CEO, Peter Rose’s, 2013 $8 million retirement bonus in its calculation. We believe Mr. Rose’s 2013 retirement bonus should have been excluded from these calculations in 2014, and certainly should be excluded in 2015, for the following table listsreasons:

1.Responding to shareholder concerns, the Compensation Committee adopted a policy in 2014 that prohibits any future retirement bonuses;

2.Mr. Rose’s retirement bonus was a one-time event – no other retirement bonus has been paid in the 35-year history of the Company and the policy above ensures none will be in the future;

3.To continue including this bonus provides a skewed depiction of pay for performance alignment, virtually ensuring a perception of misalignment over whatever look-back period it is included within; and

4.Excluding this one-time bonus would provide a much better and more accurate view of the degree of alignment between true executive compensation and stock performance.

We further believe that if Mr. Rose’s 2013 $8 million were excluded from any pay for performance evaluation utilized by these firms, then the namesrelative alignment would likely indicate pay and ages,performance alignment, and the amountabsolute alignment evaluation would reflect a high degree of correlation between executive compensation and naturestock price and financial performance.

Second, these firms tend to identify our use of the beneficial ownership of Common Stock of each Director and nominee, of each of the NamedOperating Income in our Executive Officers described in the SummaryIncentive Compensation Table, and all Directors and Executive OfficersPlan as a group at March 6, 2014. Except as noted below, each person has sole votingdesign flaw. According to one firm, our single metric “may lead executives to overly focus on narrow aspects of company performance.” As stated in our compensation philosophy, we believe this perspective is faulty and dispositive powersfails to take into account the varied and comprehensive components that culminates with respect to the shares shown.

Name Age 
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
 
Percent
of Class
Directors and Nominees:      
Peter J. Rose(1) 70 1,043,287
 *
Robert R. Wright(2) 54 19,878
 *
Mark A. Emmert(2) 61 23,669
 *
R. Jordan Gates(3) 58 443,863
 *
Dan P. Kourkoumelis(4) 62 177,534
 *
Michael J. Malone(5) 69 229,378
 *
John W. Meisenbach(6) 77 163,284
 *
Jeffrey S. Musser(7) 48 187,362
 *
Liane J. Pelletier(2) 56 4,697
 *
James L.K. Wang(8) 65 537,246
 *
Tay Yoshitani(2) 67 4,697
 *
Additional Named Executives Officers:      
Robert L. Villanueva(9) 61 191,578
 *
Bradley S. Powell(10) 53 37,360
 *
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (22 persons)(11)   4,303,807
 2.14%
___________________
*    Less than 1%
operating income:

(1)1.Includes 1,025,389 shares held in trust for which Mr. Rose maintains voting and dispositive authority and 5,000 shares subject to purchase options exercisable within sixty days.To grow operating income requires:

(2)a.
Includes 4,697 restricted shares for which the director has sole voting power, but dispositive power is restricted through May 31, 2014.
growing and maintaining a profitable customer base;

(3)b.Includes 21,822 shares subject to purchase options exercisable within sixty days.gaining new customers;

(4)c.
Includes 128,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty daysmanaging carriers and 4,697 restricted shares for which the director has sole voting power, but dispositive power is restricted through May 31, 2014.
service provider relationships and costs;

(5)d.
Includes 96,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty daysattracting and 4,697 restricted shares for which the director has sole voting power, but dispositive power is restricted through May 31, 2014.
retaining a talented employee base;

(6)e.
Includes 64,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty dayscontrolling expenses; and 4,697 restricted shares for which the director has sole voting power, but dispositive power is restricted through May 31, 2014.

(7)f.Includes 134,293 shares held in trust for which Mr. Musser maintains voting and dispositive authority and 49,677 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.collecting cash timely.

(8)2.Includes 25,000 shares subject to purchase options exercisable within sixty days.Operating income is a GAAP metric, and aligns compensation with shareholder value much better than the use of one or more non-GAAP, pro forma measures such as adjusted EBIT or adjusted EBITDA.
(9)Includes 147,361 shares held in trust for which Mr. Villanueva maintains voting and dispositive authority and 39,572 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.
(10)Includes 34,000 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days.
(11)

27    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Includes 801,821 shares subject to stock options exercisable within sixty days and 32,879 restricted shares for which the directors have sole voting power, but dispositive power is restricted through May 31, 2014. No Director or Executive Officer has pledged Company stock.


19



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview of (“CD&A”) describes the Company’s executive compensation program in 2015. In particular, this CD&A explains how the Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (all of whom are independent, non-management directors) has responsibilitymade its compensation decisions for the determination and oversight of the Company's executive compensation program ("Compensation Program"), which consists ofCompany’s executives, including the following key components:
NEO:

Base salaries for Executive Officers, which are set annually.
The Company’s executive non-equity incentive compensation plan (the "Executive Incentive Compensation Plan"), as approved by shareholders in 2008. This oversight includes approving participants of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, as well as the percentage each participant will receive from amounts available for distribution under the plan and authorizing the actual payments of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan before they occur.
The Company’s equity compensation plans, consisting of both non-qualified and incentive stock option grants. This oversight includes recommending the amount of total options to be submitted for shareholder approval via the Company’s annual proxy statement, as well as approving the amounts of stock options awarded to Executive Officers.
Employment agreements with Executive Officers.
Throughout this Proxy Statement, the individuals who served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President-Asia Pacific,Jeffrey S. Musser, President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer President-The Americas and

Philip M. Coughlin, President-Global Geographies

Eugene K. Alger, President-Global Services

Daniel R. Wall, President-Global Products

Bradley S. Powell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer during fiscal 2013, included

The CD&A also describes the pay philosophy the Committee has established for the Company’s executive officers, the process the Committee utilizes to examine performance in the Summary Compensation Table on page 26 are referredcontext of executive pay decisions, the performance goals and results for each NEO, and recent updates to as the Named Executive Officers ("NEO"). The term Executive Officerour compensation program.

2015 Performance Highlights Compared to 2014

LOGO

*  Operating Margin refers to individuals whooperating income, a GAAP measure, as a percentage of Net Revenue (a non-GAAP measure calculated as gross revenues less directly related operating expenses).

28    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Our Compensation Philosophy

The ultimate objective of our compensation program is to enhance shareholder value over the long term by incentivizing top management to achieve sustained growth in our operating income. We have successfully achieved this objective through the unique characteristics of our compensation programs which:

Encourages each manager to think and act as an entrepreneur;

Establishes compensation levels that are NEOnot perceived as arbitrary;

Provides financial rewards that are team-oriented and senior management who participate inreflect achieved performance; and

Closely aligns the Compensation Program. The term Senior Management includes all NEO, Executive Officers and other corporate officers, selected direct reports and staffinterests of the Company.
General Philosophyindividual employee with the goals of the Company and Objectivesreturns to our shareholders.

The Company believes that their overall established compensation programs, which have been in place since the Company became a publicly traded, entity,are responsible for differentiating the Company’s performance from that of many of our competitors.

We believe that our compensation programs are one of the unique characteristics responsible for differentiating our performance from that of many of our competitors. Throughout the Company’sour history, managers, including theour most senior managers, have been compensated through a combination of three basic compensation techniques. These consist of:

1.A fixed and modest base salary one that is intended to be substantially lower (48-91% lower in cases of Executive Officers) than comparable base salariescurrently set at $100,000 for similar positions in our industry;NEO and senior managers;

 
2.A broad-basedlong-term incentive equity compensation program in the form of time-vested stock option grants made to individual employees;grants; and

 
3.A non-equity incentive compensation program based uponon a fixed percentage of the cumulative operating income of the business unit controlled by each key employee, with no upper limit on the potential dollar amount that can be earned through sustained business growth.income.

20

By design, our compensation model is highly variable. We believe this motivates and properly incentivizes management to grow our business, keep costs in check, and continue to generate positive operating income. No bonus is guaranteed, since the vast majority of our business is not under long-term contract and is regularly put out for bid. We have to earn our customers’ business with every shipment, and we need a compensation structure that reflects this high customer service, short-cycle model. The design also holds management fully accountable for excessive risk-taking as any operating losses that are incurred must be recovered in full from future operating income before any non-equity incentives are re-initiated.



The Company has maintained a consistentKey Compensation Practices

We believe our policies and procedures for setting executive compensation philosophy: offer a confident and capable individual a modest base salary and the opportunity to share in a fixed and determinable percentage of the operating income generated by the business unit under his or her control. Growth in individual compensation will only occur in conjunction with an increase in a cumulative contribution to Company profits. Keykey design elements of thisour compensation philosophy include:

program represent best practice in corporate governance:

1.

What We Do

Encouraging each manager to think and act as an entrepreneur;

What We Don’t Do

LOGO

Subject NEO compensation and incentive payouts to the approval of our independent Compensation Committee

LOGONo guaranteed bonuses

LOGO

Grant pay that is overwhelmingly performance based

LOGONo perquisites

LOGO

Align annual incentive to principal driver of shareholder value (i.e., GAAP operating income)

LOGONo non-GAAP adjusted metrics

LOGO

Cap on executive incentive compensation

LOGONo supplemental pension benefits

LOGO

Align with shareholders through stock option grants

LOGONo repricing of underwater options

LOGO

Require NEO to meet share ownership guidelines

LOGONo hedging or pledging of Company shares

LOGO

Subject incentive compensation to clawback policy

LOGONo tax gross-ups paid on severance benefits

LOGO

Engage shareholders on compensation matters

   
2.Establishing compensation levels that are not perceived as being arbitrary;

29    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Summary of Key Elements of Executive Compensation

Unlike most other large public companies, our NEO pay mix is uniquely concentrated on annual incentive compensation with well-below market based salaries and moderate long-term incentive compensation. We provide no perquisites, supplemental pension benefits or other special welfare benefits to our NEO. The NEO participate in our 401(k) plan and health and welfare arrangements that are available to all of our U.S. employees.

The following charts show each element of compensation, including the changes in the mix of short-term and long-term incentives, as well as the percentage of pay at risk for NEO (on average) from 2013 to 2015:

NEO Compensation Components

98% of Pay at Risk

LOGO

 
3.(1)Developing financial rewards that are team-oriented; and
4.Closely aligning the interestsExcludes CEO Retirement Bonus of the individual employee with the goals of the Company and returns to the shareholders.$8 million in 2013
Using this compensation model, changes in individual

Our heavy focus on annual incentive compensation will occur in proportion to changes in Company profits, creating a direct alignment between corporate performancereflects and shareholder interests. The effectiveness of this alignment is demonstrated by comparing the year-over-year impact on 2013, 2012 and 2011 management bonuses. The Company’ssupports our customer service focused business model operating income in 2013 was 4% higher than the amount reported in 2012. Bonuses earned by field and executive management in 2013 were also both up by 4%, as compared with 2012. Bonuses earned by NEO remained essentially constant in 2013 as compared with 2012, primarily as a resultnon-asset driven organization. We have very few income producing assets. Our revenues and our profits are derived solely through the hard work and discipline of adding additionalour management team and our employees throughout the world in providing outstanding service to the non-equity incentive program through reducing the relative percentages previously allocated to select NEOour customers. Our revenues and other Executive Officers. The Company’s operating income in 2012 was 14% lower than the amount reported in 2011our profits are not guaranteed. Therefore, every day we must remain focused on delivering revenues, managing costs and bonuses earned by field and executive management in 2012 were also down by 9% and 14%, respectively, as compared with 2011. Bonuses earned by NEO decreased 20% in 2012 as compared with 2011 due to lowering NEO relative percentages of the Bonus Poolproviding value for allocation to additional key employees. The Company’s management incentive compensation programs have always been incentive-based and performance driven and there is no built-in bias that favors or enriches management in a manner inconsistent with overall corporate performance. Theour customers. Our short-term Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, is intended to providewhich has been in place since 1985, provides a direct line of sight between the largest componentduties and responsibilities of our management team and these goals by focusing on a single comprehensive unadjusted metric: GAAP operating income.

Our use of operating income rewards management for delivering profitable results. No incentive payouts are made if we have no positive operating income, regardless of the executivelevel of or growth in revenues. Payout levels increase year over year only if management can increase the level of operating income. Our Executive Incentive Compensation Program.

Plan creates a culture of shared economic interests among our top managers and ensures a universal and daily focus on the achievement of superior financial results. Equally important, our focus on continual improvement in operating income drives long-term shareholder value creation.

In addition to short-term incentive compensation, we grant long-term incentive compensation to our NEO in the form of time-vested stock options. We believe stock options are inherently performance-based compensation and directly align our NEO long-term interests with those of our shareholders. These stock options vest over multiple years and serve to retain our NEO.

30    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Risk & Recovery

Because the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan is based on cumulative operating income, any operating losses that are incurred by the Company must be recovered from future operating income before any amounts will be due to participants. Since the most significant portion of executive compensation comes from the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, the Company believes that this cumulative feature is a disincentive to excessive risk taking by its senior managers. No one individual has the authority to commit the Company to excessive risk taking. Due to the nature of the Company’s services, itthe business has a short operating cycle. The outcome of any higher risk transactions, such as overriding established credit limits, would be known in a relatively short time frame. Management believes that when the potential and certain impact on the bonus is fully considered in light of this short operating cycle, the potential for short-term gains that could be generated by engaging in riskyhigher risk business practices is sufficiently mitigated to discourage excessive and inappropriate risk taking.mitigated. Management believes that both the stability and the long-term growth in revenues, net revenues, operating income and net earnings are a result of the incentives and recovery mechanism inherent in the Company’s compensation programs.

Historically,

In addition, the Company has expanded its “clawback policy” under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act related to financial restatements to include not employed third-partyjust the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), but all members of senior management.

Alignment of Executive Compensation Programs with Shareholders’ Interests

Our pay programs directly serve the interests of our shareholders through:

Supporting a culture that results in low turnover and long tenured employees who look to make a career at Expeditors.    Low turnover substantially reduces our cost to recruit and train new hires. Long-tenured employees and managers provide a strong and growing bench strength. This is evidenced by the long tenure of our top managers: our CEO has been with the Company for 33 years and our other NEO average tenure with the Company is 25 years.

Rewarding management for achieved performance.    Our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan will only deliver compensation consultantsif we have positive operating income. The level of incentive compensation paid is directly correlated to the level of operating income. Future increases in short-term incentive compensation payouts are dependent upon management’s ability to increase our operating income year over year. Stock options granted to our NEO will only have value if management can increase share price in excess of the option’s exercise price, which is set at the closing share price on the date of grant.

Increasing value over the long term.    Our heavy emphasis on operating income is due to its strong correlation to enterprise value creation. For example, during the governing factors10-year time period ended December 31, 2015, annual earnings per share has increased from $1.06 to $2.40.

The charts below show the Company’s operational performance compared to total NEO compensation and Expeditors’ total shareholder return (“TSR”) compared to Peer Group TSR over the past three years, indexed year-to-year performance using a January 1, 2013 base year investment of $100. TSR consists of stock price appreciation plus reinvested dividends.

LOGO

(1)Excludes former CEO’s retirement bonus of $8 million in 2013.

31    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Base Salaries

Throughout our history, the Company has followed a policy of offering its management employees a compensation package that are inherent in the compensation programs described above. Limited benchmarking activities are merely done to review base salaries and other current compensation information and practices disclosed by certain U.S. publicly traded companies in the logistics and transportation industry. This limited benchmarking has not altered the Company's compensation programs, policies or decisions but does annually confirm certain comparative disclosures, such asis heavily weighted toward incentive-based compensation. To emphasize at-risk variable pay, we have customarily set annual base salaries of our NEO compared toand other top managers well below competitive market levels. Our NEO’s 2015 base salaries were well below median NEO base salaries in our peer group.

As part of its annual review of compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves each NEO base salary. In 2015, we set base salaries for similarNEO at $100,000.

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan

The Executive Incentive Compensation Plan is the backbone of our compensation program. The Plan has been in place since 1985 and its unique design incentivizes our management team to continually increase our operating income, which in turn drives long-term shareholder value. The Executive Incentive Compensation Plan is designed to drive superior financial results and is effective because of its simplicity and transparency.

Described below are the key terms of the Plan.

Bonus Pool Design

A Bonus Pool funds all amounts paid under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. Since 1985, the Bonus Pool has remained equal to 10% of our GAAP operating income (prior to the bonus pool amount). The Compensation Committee believes that setting the Bonus Pool at a fixed percentage of operating income, with fluctuations in amounts paid tied to actual changes in operating income, aligns the interests of employees and shareholders.

Discussed below is the manner in which the Bonus Pool is allocated and paid to our NEO and other eligible managers.

Eligibility for Allocation of Bonus Pool

The Compensation Committee, at its discretion, determined which executive officers and other top managers would be eligible to participate in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan in 2015. This determination was made quarterly. For each quarter of 2015, the Committee determined that each NEO and every member of senior management who received annual base salary equal to or less than $120,000 would participate in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.

32    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Determination of Executive’s Allocable Portion of Bonus Pool

The Compensation Committee, at its discretion, determined each NEO allocable share of the Bonus Pool (as well as for certain other eligible employees). This determination was made for each fiscal quarter of 2015. The Compensation Committee considered various factors in determining each executive’s allocable share of the Bonus Pool, including:

The executive’s roles and responsibilities with the Company. Generally, those executives in the most senior positions are allocated a greater portion of the Bonus Pool than those serving in less senior positions;

The contribution of the executive in increasing corporate profits and shareholder value;

An executive’s promotion or noteworthy accomplishments during the fiscal year; and

The executive’s tenure with the Company.

The Compensation Committee re-determines each NEO’s, as well as other eligible senior managers’, allocable share of the Bonus Pool. For our most senior executives, their allocable percentage of the Bonus Pool is likely to decline over time to accommodate additional entrants into the Bonus Pool. This incentivizes our senior executives to grow the business to at least maintain and ultimately to increase their compensation under the Bonus Pool.

The table below shows the significant reductions in incentives to NEO positions from executive incentive bonus pool payouts from 2013 to 2015. Percentages paid out to NEO positions in the Company's industry, and thatExecutive Incentive Compensation Plan, including the Company's compensation package offered to executives is competitive and gives executivesimpact of the opportunity to earn superior levels of compensation for retaining already established business and gaining new business. Certaincap on payout, were as follows:

LOGO

The tables above include information from the 2013 and 2014 proxy statements and presents comparative information of NEO as follows:

(1)CEO was P. Rose in 2013 and J. Musser in 2014 and 2015.

(2)NEO1 was R. Villanueva in 2013 and P. Coughlin in 2014 and 2015.

(3)NEO2 was J. Wang in 2013 and 2014 and E. Alger in 2015.

(4)NEO3 was J. Gates in 2013 and 2014 and D. Wall in 2015.

(5)CFO was B. Powell for all periods presented.

33    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy StatementsStatement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Cap on Payouts

Effective July 1, 2014, the Company instituted a cap on the maximum payout that our NEO and other senior management employees may receive under the Bonus Pool. Under the cap, these executives may not receive a payout that exceeds 115% of CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc., FedEx Corporation, Forward Air Corp., Hub Group, Inc., Landstar System, Inc., Ryder System, Inc., United Parcel Services, Inc. and UTi Worldwide, Inc. were reviewed for comparison purposes. While most of these companies are not necessarilythe highest amount earned by that individual in the three prior comparable quarters. In connection with a promotion or other achievement, which may result in sizea higher bonus percentage, the Committee may adjust the cap commensurately. The Committee made no adjustments to the Company, some are significantly largerpayout cap for any NEO during 2015 other than for Mr. Wall, who was promoted to President-Global Products in 2015.

In 2015, operating income was 121% of 2014, but NEO payout was capped at 115%. Therefore, Mr. Musser’s payout was reduced by $237,261 and others considerably smaller,all other NEO were reduced by a combined $763,726.

Timing of Payouts

For each quarter of fiscal 2015, we had positive operating income which resulted in the funding of the Bonus Pool for each quarter. At the conclusion of each quarter, the Compensation Committee believesreviewed and approved each NEO incentive payment under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan based on the executive officer’s allocable share of the Bonus Pool for that quarter. Earned incentive awards were paid subsequent to the filing of the Company’s Form 10-Q or 10-K with the SEC.

Effect of No Positive Operating Income (Operating Loss)

The Company has never incurred an annual or quarterly operating loss since going public in September 1984. Nonetheless, we maintain the following stringent policies in the event that we should incur no or negative operating income for a quarter:

No incentive payments will be made for a quarter in which we have no or negative operating income.

Any cumulative operating losses must be made up by future operating income before we will start to fund the Bonus Pool for incentive payments. For example, if we incurred a $5 million operating loss in the first quarter of a fiscal year, no incentive payments would be made for that quarter. If operating income in the second and third quarter of such fiscal year equaled, in the aggregate, $5 million, we would still make no incentive payments for those quarters. However, in the fourth quarter, if quarterly operating income was positive, the Bonus Pool would be funded and incentive payments would be made to eligible executives.

The foregoing policy also would apply if operating income, in years that have previously been audited and reported, were to be subsequently adjusted downward. In that situation, no payments under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan would be due until future operating income results exceed the amount of the downward adjustment. However, no additional payments would be due if such adjustments increased previously reported fiscal year operating income.

We believe this information is useful for the limited comparisons described above.


21



It is the opinion of bothpolicy protects shareholder interests while strongly incentivizing our management team to maintain and increase positive operating income every fiscal quarter.

Non-Adjusted Operating Income: A True Metric

Expeditors differs from some larger public companies in that the Compensation Committee does not adjust the operating income metric for any reason, such as for restructuring costs, acquisitions and divestitures, currency fluctuations, change in tax rules and other unusual items. We believe that management must be held accountable for our results regardless of external market forces that may adversely affect the Company’slevel of bonus payouts.

34    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Equity Incentive Compensation Plan

Our equity incentive compensation plan is designed to incentivize management thatto increase long-term shareholder value and to encourage retention of key talent over a sustained time period. For 2015, stock options were the manner and degreeexclusive form of equity incentive compensation granted to which eachour NEO, as well as to approximately 2,300 employees. Since realized compensation from a stock option is only achieved if the value of the compensation components described above have been utilized has had a direct impact onCompany increases over the Company’s long-term financial performance. Furthermore,long term, we believe stock options closely align management believes that this combined compensation program has a proven track record of aligning both the long-term and short-term interests of the Company’s executives with the interests of the Company’s shareholders.

Determination of NEO 2015 Stock Option Grants

The Compensation Committee considered various factors in determining the resultssize of last year's say-on-pay voteeach NEO stock option grant for 2015, including:

Executive officer performance during the past 12 months, including promotions or other noteworthy accomplishments;

Targeted NEO equity-to-overall compensation ratio;

Tenure with the Company;

Current position and associated responsibilities; and

Amount of grants relative to peers within the Company.

The table below shows the increases in reviewinglong-term incentive compensation to NEO positions from 2013 to 2015.

LOGO

The tables above include information from the Company's compensation policies. 2013 and 2014 proxy statements and presents comparative information of NEO as follows:

(1)CEO was P. Rose in 2013 and J. Musser in 2014 and 2015.

(2)NEO1 was R. Villanueva in 2013 and P. Coughlin in 2014 and 2015

(3)NEO2 was J. Wang in 2013 and 2014 and E. Alger in 2015

(4)NEO3 was J. Gates in 2013 and 2014 and D. Wall in 2015

(5)CFO was B. Powell for all periods presented.

35    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Stock Option Grants

In 2015, we granted stock options to our NEO and nearly 2,300 key employees with an exercise price equal to our closing share price on the grant date and that vest 50% three years from the grant date; 75% after four years; and the remainder after five years.

To better align with market practices and attract key talent, the 2016 Stock Option Plan, if approved by shareholders, would change vesting to 33% one year from the grant date; 66% after two years; and the remainder after three years.

The Company’s equity incentive plans prohibit the repricing or exchange of underwater stock options. The vast majority of stock options (including those made to our NEO) are approved and granted at the Board of Directors meeting immediately following our Annual Shareholders Meeting.

Perquisites & Other Personal Benefits

The Company does not provide executive officers, named and otherwise, and key employees with perquisites and personal benefits that are not available to all employees. The Company provides standard benefits packages to all employees which vary country by country based on individual country regulations. In the United States, for instance, the Company pays 100% of the medical, dental and vision insurance premiums, as well as offering a matching contribution of $0.50 for each $1.00 of employee savings, up to a maximum annual Company contribution of $1,500 per qualified employee, under an employee savings plan intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code.

The aggregate value of any perquisites for any NEO does not exceed $10,000 per year.

The Company does not provide tax “gross-ups” on severance benefits.

36    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Role of the Compensation Committee, Management & Consultants

The Compensation Committee viewedrecommends all compensation decisions for the 86% favorable vote on last year's say-on-pay vote continued to validateNEO. Compensation decisions, other than compensation and option grant determinations for the Company's approachCEO, are made in consultation with the CEO. With respect to the Executive Incentive Compensation ProgramPlan, the CEO recommends allocation percentages for all participating executive officers, which must be reviewed and as a result no changes were made.

Targeted Overallapproved by the Compensation
Committee.

Management does not believe that compensation targets, per se, are consistent with the underlying compensation philosophy utilized by the Company. The Company does recognize, however, recognize that because it operates in the highly competitive global logistics services industry, the quality of its service depends upon the quality of the executives and other employees it is able to attract and retain. In order to succeed, the Company believes that it must be able to attract and retain qualified executives and employees. The Compensation Committee considers the competitiveness of the entire compensation package of an Executive Officerexecutive officer relative to that paid by similar companies when evaluating the adequacy of the base salaries, the percentage allocationallocations of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and grants of stock options. The Company’s objective is to offer a total compensation package which gives the Executive Officerexecutive officer the opportunity to be paidrewarded at a level which the Company believesbelieved to be superior to that offered by the Company’s competitors in the global logistics services industry. The Company believes that the opportunity for achieving superior levels of compensation is predicated on achieving sustained, long-term profitable results whichthat are superior to those of its competitors.

The Compensation Committee used benchmark data on a limited basis to review base salaries and other compensation information and practices disclosed by certain U.S. publicly traded companies in the logistics and transportation industry. This limited benchmarking has not altered the Company’s competitors.

compensation programs, policies or decisions. However, the benchmark data has confirmed that the Company’s compensation packages offered to executives are competitive and give executives appropriate incentives to retain and gain profitable customers and business. Benchmark data was derived from proxy statements filed by CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc., Con-way, Inc., Forward Air Corp., Hub Group, Inc., JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc., Landstar System, Inc., Ryder System, Inc., and UTi Worldwide, Inc. While these companies are of various sizes in terms of revenue, the Compensation Committee believes the benchmark data derived from this group of companies is useful for the limited comparisons described above.

Based on the Company’s general philosophy and objectives described above, hypothetical targets for the overall compensation for executives and other managers are considered neither useful nor desirable. The Compensation Committee is actively involved in reviewing and approving payments under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan whichthat are available to each participating Executive Officer,executive officer and other key employees. These payments are allocated from a pool consisting of 10% of pre-bonus operating income (referred to hereafter as the “Bonus Pool”). This is done in consultationThe Compensation Committee consults with the Chief Executive Officer.CEO with respect to incentive payments made from the Bonus Pool to other executive officers and certain senior management. Over time, as the Company has grown, more participants have been added to this Bonus Pool. The overriding motivation in determining the relative percentage of the Bonus Pool allocated to each participant has not been to target specific levels of compensation. Rather, these allocationsAllocations of the Bonus Pool have been made to perpetuate a culture that focuses management’s attention on creating and sustaining long-term profitable earnings growth by rewarding an increasing number of Executive Officersexecutive officers and other key employees with a percentage of the Company’s growing profits, which are primarily a function of year-over-year increases in operating income.

The Compensation Committee’s practice of consistently reducing the percentage of the Bonus Pool designated to individual NEO reinforces the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan'sPlan’s design of stimulating growth systematically by requiring increasedin operating income to maintain or grow from previous levels of compensation, and expanded profitability to actually increase compensation. Not only does this allow for broadened participation in a growing and more valuablethe Bonus Pool, it creates a motivated, risk aware Executive Officersmanagement team focused on stable and growingsustainable growth in operating income. Over time these Executive Officers have smaller percentages

Historically, neither the Company nor the Compensation Committee has retained the services of a more valuable Bonus Pool. For instance,compensation consultant. In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) to provide advice on executive and Director compensation matters. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Meridian pursuant to SEC and NASDAQ rules and determined that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Meridian from providing independent and objective advice to the Compensation Committee. Meridian will begin to provide advice to the Compensation Committee during 2016. Meridian played no role in 1985,2015 compensation matters.

37    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with each NEO. Each of the first full yearemployment agreements is automatically renewable upon expiration for additional one-year periods unless either party elects otherwise.

Executive Stock Ownership Policy

On February 24, 2014, the plan was implemented, Mr. Rose’s percentage was 25% whileBoard adopted a policy regarding executive stock ownership guidelines. These stock ownership guidelines are applicable to our NEO, and other certain other senior management holding a title of Senior Vice President or above. These guidelines are designed to increase executives’ equity stakes in the Company and to further align executives’ interests with those of shareholders. The guidelines require covered executives to own shares of the Company’s Common Stock sufficient to satisfy the amount specified below as a multiple of the executive’s annual base salary:

Chief Executive Officer

15 x Base Salary

Currently$    1,500,000            

President or Executive Vice President

10 x Base Salary

Currently$    1,000,000            

Senior Vice President

5 x Base Salary

Currently$       500,000            

Executives in the positions above will need to achieve the corresponding ownership target within five years of promotion to the position or within five years of the policy adoption date. This policy excludes stock option grants from the ownership calculation and is governed by the Compensation Committee.

It is expected that covered executives will acquire shares to meet the holding requirements by participating in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and by exercising vested stock options and holding those shares. The table below shows the value of shares held by NEO at December 31, 2015.

Chief Executive Officer

$6,651,754

Other NEO

$6,933,764

Insider Trading Policy Prohibits Hedging or Pledging

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits its Board of Directors and employees from hedging or pledging their ownership of Company stock, including trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls or other derivative instruments related to Company stock.

Other Retirement or Disability Payments

The Company has no formal obligations to make any payments to any executive officer upon his bonus compensation was $75,200or her death, disability or retirement except to executive officers domiciled in countries where statutory regulation require that these benefits be provided to all employees. The Company adopted a policy in 2014 that prohibits the payment of any retirement bonuses to executive officers and members of senior management.

While there is no legal or contractual obligation to do so, the Company has, on occasion, accelerated the vesting of any unvested stock options of employees who pass away.

38    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Potential Payments upon Termination & Change in Control

Stock options granted to employees including the NEO, will become immediately vested and fully exercisable in connection with the occurrence of a total pool“Change in Control” of $295,700.the Company. “Change in Control” means either of the following: (a) when any person (with certain exceptions) becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% of the Company’s then outstanding securities, or (b) when a transaction requiring shareholder approval occurs involving the sale of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company or a merger of the Company with or into another company.

The employment agreement for each NEO contains a covenant not to compete which allows the Company to extend the restriction on competition with the Company for six months following termination of the employment relationship. The extension is at the sole discretion of the Company unless the employee terminates the employment relationship by resigning during a specified period surrounding a “change in control,” in which case the employee may decline any accompanying lump sum payment and thereby avoid the accompanying restriction on competition.

Scenario 1: No changes are made in management as a result of a change in control as described above. NEO would receive the realized gain on exercise, if any, upon acceleration of unvested stock options shown in Column 1.

Scenario 2: NEO employment agreements are terminated with cause subsequent to a change in control. Amounts due would include the realized gain on exercise, if any, upon acceleration of unvested stock options under Column 1. No amounts are due to the NEO under Column 2. At the Company’s discretion, as noted above, for a lump sum payment of half the NEO base salary under Column 3, the Company could invoke the non-compete provisions contained in the employment agreement.

Scenario 3:NEO resigns subsequent to a change in control. The NEO would be entitled to the realized gain on exercise, if any, upon acceleration of unvested stock options under Column 1. The NEO would not be entitled to any cash compensation. The Company could, in its sole discretion, pay the NEO a lump sum amount under Column 3 in exchange for invoking the non-compete provisions in the employment agreement. In a change in control situation, the NEO has the option to reject or to accept this lump sum payment. By rejecting the endpayment, the executive will no longer be subject to the non-compete provisions of 2013, Mr. Rose’s sharethe employment agreement.

Scenario 4:NEO employment agreements are terminated without cause subsequent to the change in control. Amounts due would include the realized gain on exercise, if any, upon acceleration of unvested stock options shown in Column 1. In addition, the NEO would be entitled to receive cash compensation based on one-half of base salary plus one-half of the amount of the Bonus Pool had decreasedpayment received by the executive in the preceding twelve months under Column 4. Under the terms of the employment agreement, when an executive is terminated without cause, the non-compete provisions remain in effect for six-months from the date of termination.

39    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

The following tables illustrate the payments due to 8.75% while his bonus amount had increasedeach of the NEO in the event of termination under either “for cause” or “without cause”:

  Name

 

  

For Cause (1)

 

  

For Cause with
Non-Compete
Agreement(1)

 

  

Without Cause (2)  

 

   
  Jeffrey S. Musser

 

  $                —  $            50,000  $                2,008,836 
   
  Philip M. Coughlin

 

  $                —  $            50,000  $                1,798,473 
   
  Eugene K. Alger

 

  $                —  $            50,000  $                1,729,262 
   
  Daniel R. Wall

 

  $                —  $            50,000  $                1,367,390 
   
  Bradley S. Powell

 

  $                —  $            50,000  $                1,728,352 

*All amounts are based upon calculations at December 31, 2015.

(1)When terminating an executive officer for cause, the Company may, in its sole discretion, enforce the non-compete provision contained in the employment agreements for a lump sum payment representing 50% of the executive officer’s base salary. The term “cause” as defined by the employment agreement is any act of an executive officer, which in the reasonable judgment of the Board of Directors, constitutes dishonesty, larceny, fraud, deceit, gross negligence, a crime involving moral turpitude, willful misrepresentation to shareholders, Directors or officers or material breach of the employment agreement. The non-compete provision is automatically extended except in circumstances discussed above.

(2)When terminating an executive without cause, the Company must pay the executive officer cash compensation in a lump sum amount equal to 50% of his or her base salary plus 50% of the amount of the preceding twelve months of non-equity incentive compensation.

The following table and accompanying narrative illustrates the payments that would be due to $5,368,337 (a compounded annual growth rateeach of over 16%)the NEO under several possible “change in control” scenarios.

   Column 1   Column 2   Column 3   Column 4 
   Accelerated Vesting of
Stock Options

Based on Change in Control
   Resign or
Terminated for
   Terminated for
Cause with
Non-Compete
   Terminated
Without
 

  Name

 

  

Shares

 

  

Realized Gain (1)

 

   

Cause

 

   

Agreement

 

   

Cause

 

 
     

Jeffrey S. Musser

 

  208,500  $    108,700    $  —      $    50,000    $    2,008,836   
     

Philip M. Coughlin

 

  147,725  $      73,350    $  —      $50,000    $1,798,473   
     

Eugene K. Alger

 

  109,125  $      73,350    $  —      $50,000    $1,729,262   
     

Daniel R. Wall

 

  100,875  $      59,800    $  —      $50,000    $1,367,390   
     

Bradley S. Powell

 

  112,000  $      70,700    $  —      $50,000    $1,728,352   

(1)The realized gain was calculated based on a closing market price of the Company’s common stock of $45.10 per share at December 31, 2015, multiplied by the number of each NEO unvested stock options at that date, which would immediately vest in the event of a change in control as of that date, less the aggregate amount that would be required to be paid to exercise the options.

40    |    Notice of a total poolAnnual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Policy on Deductibility of $61,341,000. OverCompensation

Under Section 162(m) of the same period,Code, the Company's market capitalization increased from less than $40 million dollarsFederal income tax deduction for certain types of compensation paid to approximately $8 billion dollars (a compounded annual growth rateeach of over 21%).

With respectour NEO (except our CFO) is limited to NEO,$1,000,000 per taxable year unless such compensation meets certain requirements. The Compensation Committee believes that this limitation will not apply to compensation paid in 2015. In making future compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee administersintends to take into account and mitigate to the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.

22



Roleextent feasible the effect of the deduction limitation under Code Section 162(m) as it discharges its responsibilities.

However, the Compensation Committee may determine it is in the best interest of the Company to award compensation to a NEO which is not fully deductible as a result of this limitation.

Compensation Decisions

Committee Report

The Compensation Committee makes allbelieves that the compensation decisions for the CEO and other NEO as well as base salariesare consistent with its philosophy and stock option grantsthe objectives described above. The Committee made substantive changes in 2014 to NEO compensation and policies in response to prior years’ say-on-pay results and feedback received from shareholders.

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

Mark Emmert, Chair

John Meisenbach

Tay Yoshitani

41    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Summary Compensation Table for all Executive Officers (fromthe Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015

The table below summarizes the total amount of stock options approved annuallycompensation earned by the shareholders). These decisions, other than compensation and option grant determinationseach NEO for each of the Chief Executive Officer, are made in consultationfiscal years shown. The Company has entered into employment and indemnification agreements with the Chief Executive Officer, but implementation of all recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer requiresNEO.

The NEO were not entitled to receive payments which would be characterized as “Bonus” payments for the formal written approvalfiscal years shown. Amounts listed under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” were determined based on percentages of the Compensation Committee. With respectBonus Pool that were allocated to the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, the Chief Executive Officer recommends allocation percentages for all participating Executive Officers, which must be reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. Two Executive Officers did not participate in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan; while their base salary, title and appointment are subject to approvaleach NEO by the Compensation Committee their portion of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan comes from the standard bonus amounts (25% of pre-bonus operating income, after a corporate management fee is levied) earned by the business units under their direction. Base salaries for each Executive Officer not participating in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan are recommended by the applicable Executive Officer to whom the executive reports.

Base Salaries
Throughout its history, the Company has followed the policy of offering its Executive Officers and other key employees a compensation package which is heavily weighted toward incentive-based compensation. Accordingly, the Company believes that annual base salaries of its Executive Officers are generally set well below competitive levels paid to senior executives with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at other comparably-sized companies engaged in similar businesses as to that of the Company. This belief is based on the general knowledgefactors described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis contained herein.

Salaries for the NEO accounted for approximately 2% of their total compensation and “at-risk” compensation - “Option Awards” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” accounted for approximately 98% of the Compensation Committee and managementtotal compensation. Benefits accounted for less than 1% of the total compensation practices inof NEO.

The following table sets out the industrytype and in part, on a reviewamount of compensation disclosures inpaid to each NEO for the proxyyears ended December 31:

  Name & Position

 

  

Year

 

  

Salary

 

   

Option
Awards (3)

 

   

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (4)

 

  

All Other
Compensation
(5)

 

  

Total

 

 

 

Jeffrey S. Musser(1)

  2015  $    100,000    $    1,540,115    $    3,917,671  $    1,500  $    5,559,286  

 

President &

Chief Executive Officer

 

  2014  $100,000    $1,497,198    $    3,481,338  $    1,500  $5,080,036  

 

Philip M. Coughlin(1)

  2015  $100,000    $1,108,883    $    3,496,945  $    1,500  $4,707,328  

President - Global Geographies

& Operations

 

  2014  $112,731    $1,038,681    $    2,959,491  $    1,500  $4,112,403  

 

Eugene K. Alger(2)

President - Global Services

  2015  $100,000    $800,860    $    3,358,524  $    1,500  $4,260,884  

 

Daniel R. Wall(2)

President - Global Products

  2015  $100,000    $1,002,723    $    2,634,779  $    1,500  $3,739,002  

 

Bradley S. Powell

  2015  $100,000    $800,860    $    3,356,703  $    1,500  $4,259,063  

Senior Vice President

  2014  $100,000    $748,599    $    2,934,129  $    1,500  $3,784,228  

& Chief Financial Officer

 

  2013  $100,000    $60,800    $    2,706,051  $    1,500  $2,868,351  

(1)Messrs. Musser and Coughlin were not NEO of the Company in 2013.

(2)Messrs. Alger and Wall were not NEO of the Company in 2014 and 2013.

(3)This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted in each of the years presented. All assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the option awards are included in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K as filed on February 25, 2015.

(4)The payments were made pursuant to the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. Amounts for Mr. Coughlin in 2014 also include $1,329,968 earned under the operating district compensation plan prior to his promotion to President-Global Geographies and Operations. The amounts listed were earned during the fiscal year.

(5)These amounts include the Company’s matching contributions of $.50 for each $1.00 of employee savings, up to a maximum annual Company contribution of $1,500 per qualified employee, under an employee savings plan intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code.

42    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth certain companies ininformation regarding awards granted during 2015 to the industry group index shown in the stock performance graphNEO:

        Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
        

  Name

 

  

Grant Date

 

  

Threshold

 

  

Target

 

  

Maximum

 

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (2)

 

  

Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards (3)

 

  

Grant Date  
Fair Value  
of Option  
Awards (4)  

 

  Jeffrey S. Musser

 

  

5/21/2015

 

  

 

  

$    3,917,671

 

  

 

  

100,000

 

  

$    47.27  

 

  

$  1,540,115  

 

  Philip M. Coughlin

 

  

5/21/2015

 

  

 

  

$    3,496,945

 

  

 

  

72,000

 

  

$    47.27  

 

  

$  1,108,883  

 

  Eugene K. Alger

 

  

5/21/2015

 

  

 

  

$    3,358,524

 

  

 

  

52,000

 

  

$    47.27  

 

  

$     800,860  

 

  Daniel R. Wall

 

  

5/21/2015

 

  

 

  

$    2,634,779

 

  

 

  

29,000

 

  

$    47.27  

 

  

$     446,633  

 

    

8/3/2015

 

  

 

  

    —

 

  

 

  

36,000

 

  

$    47.08  

 

  

$     556,090  

 

  Bradley S. Powell

 

  

5/21/2015

 

  

 

  

$    3,356,703

 

  

 

  

52,000

 

  

$    47.27  

 

  

$     800,860  

 

(1)The total amount available to executive officers participating in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, including all NEO, is limited to 10% of pre-bonus operating income. Individual amounts earned under this plan are determined by participation percentages approved by the Compensation Committee. The Company does not use thresholds or targets or maximums in determining levels of compensation.

(2)The above grants were made pursuant to the Company’s 2015 Stock Option Plan.

(3)The exercise price is the market closing price of the underlying security on the grant date.

(4)All assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the option awards are included in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included on Form 10-K as filed on February 25, 2016.

Option Exercises & Year-End Option Value Tables

The following tables set forth certain information regarding options exercised and held by the NEO.

Options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2015:

    

 

Option Exercises                

 

  Name  

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise

 

      

Value Realized
on Exercise (1)

 

     

 

Jeffrey S. Musser

 

  14,899

 

      

 

$    340,740 

 

  

 

   

 

Philip M. Coughlin

 

  20,000

 

      

 

$    459,000 

 

  

 

   

 

Eugene K. Alger

 

  20,000

 

      

 

$    473,703 

 

  

 

   

 

Daniel R. Wall

 

  19,261

 

      

 

$    453,597 

 

  

 

   

 

Bradley S. Powell

 

  

 

      

 

—          

 

  

 

   

(1)    Represents the difference between the market price of the Company’s Annual Report to shareholders.

Modest, below-market base salaries are a key component inCommon Stock at exercise and the Company’s compensation strategy. The Company's compensation philosophy is to create a situation where the risks and returns of entrepreneurship are present at each significant levelexercise price of the Company. Base salaries for all Executive Officers are reviewed and approvedoptions, multiplied by the Compensation Committee as partnumber of an annual overall reviewoptions exercised.

43    |    Notice of compensation. The base salary may be changed as the result of the Compensation Committee’s decision that an individual’s contribution, duties, and responsibilities to the Company have changed. Base salaries for NEO are typically not adjusted. The base salary of $110,000 per annum for the retiring Chief Executive Officer, for instance, had not changed since Mr. Rose assumed that position in 1988. The base salary for all other NEO is $100,000 per annum and has not changed in the past five years.

Base salaries for each of the NEO for 2013 were as follows:
   
NamePositionBase Salary
Peter J. RoseChairman and Chief Executive Officer$110,000
James L.K. WangPresident-Asia Pacific$100,000
R. Jordan GatesPresident and Chief Operating Officer$100,000
Robert L. VillanuevaPresident-The Americas$100,000
Bradley S. PowellSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer$100,000
Equity Compensation Plan
 The Company provides an equity compensation component to the Compensation Program in the form of stockAnnual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Outstanding option grants made to individual employees, including Executive Officers,awards at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Company believes that stock option grants afford a desirable, long-term compensation method because they closely align the interests of management with the interests of shareholders. During 2013, the Compensation Committee granted stock options for 2,779,700 shares to approximately 3,400 employees including the NEO as shown in the table below. All stockDecember 31, 2015:

  Name

 

  

Year of
Grant

 

   

Exercisable

 

   Unexercisable (1)   

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Unearned Options

 

  

Exercise or
Base Price

 

   

Expiration
Date

 

 

 

Jeffrey S. Musser

  

 

 

 

2015  

 

  

        100,000          $47.27     5/21/2025  
  

 

 

 

2014  

 

  

        96,000          $45.56     12/5/2024  
  

 

 

 

2013  

 

  

        10,000          $35.32     5/1/2023  
  

 

 

 

2012  

 

  

   2,500     2,500          $40.74     5/2/2022  
  

 

 

 

2010  

 

  

   10,000               $40.64     5/5/2020  
  

 

 

 

2009  

 

  

   5,000               $37.13     5/6/2019  
  

 

 

 

2008  

 

  

   3,000               $46.94     5/7/2018  
  

 

 

 

2007  

 

  

   5,000               $42.90     5/2/2017  
   

 

 

 

2006  

 

  

   10,000               $43.88     5/3/2016  

 

Philip M. Coughlin

  

 

 

 

2015  

 

  

        72,000          $47.27     5/21/2025  
  

 

 

 

2014  

 

  

        66,600          $45.56     12/5/2024  
  

 

 

 

2013  

 

  

        7,500          $35.32     5/1/2023  
  

 

 

 

2011  

 

  

   4,875     1,625          $52.80     5/4/2021  
  

 

 

 

2009  

 

  

   5,000               $37.13     5/6/2019  
  

 

 

 

2008  

 

  

   7,000               $46.94     5/7/2018  
  

 

 

 

2007  

 

  

   5,000               $42.90     5/2/2017  
   

 

 

 

2006  

 

  

   10,000               $43.88     5/3/2016  

 

Eugene K. Alger

  

 

 

 

2015  

 

  

        52,000          $47.27     5/21/2025  
  

 

 

 

2014  

 

  

        48,000          $45.56     12/5/2024  
  

 

 

 

2013  

 

  

        7,500          $35.32     5/1/2023  
  

 

 

 

2011  

 

  

   4,875     1,625          $52.80     5/4/2021  
  

 

 

 

2009  

 

  

   5,000               $37.13     5/6/2019  
  

 

 

 

2008  

 

  

   7,000               $46.94     5/7/2018  
  

 

 

 

2007  

 

  

   5,000               $42.90     5/2/2017  
   

 

 

 

2006  

 

  

   10,000               $43.88     5/3/2016  

 

Daniel R. Wall

  

 

 

 

2015  

 

  

        36,000          $47.08     8/3/2025  
  

 

 

 

2015  

 

  

        29,000          $47.27     5/21/2025  
  

 

 

 

2014  

 

  

        27,000          $45.56     12/5/2024  
  

 

 

 

2013  

 

  

        5,000          $35.32     5/1/2023  
  

 

 

 

2012  

 

  

   2,500     2,500          $40.74     5/2/2022  
  

 

 

 

2011  

 

  

   4,125     1,375          $52.80     5/4/2021  
  

 

 

 

2010  

 

  

   10,000               $40.64     5/5/2020  
  

 

 

 

2009  

 

  

   5,000               $37.13     5/6/2019  
  

 

 

 

2008  

 

  

   5,000               $46.94     5/7/2018  
  

 

 

 

2007  

 

  

   5,000               $42.90     5/2/2017  
   

 

 

 

2006  

 

  

   8,000               $43.88     5/3/2016  

 

Bradley S. Powell

  

 

 

 

2015  

 

  

        52,000          $47.27     5/21/2025  
  

 

 

 

2014  

 

  

        48,000          $45.56     12/5/2024  
  

 

 

 

2013  

 

  

        5,000          $35.32     5/1/2023  
  

 

 

 

2012  

 

  

   5,000     5,000          $40.74     5/2/2022  
  

 

 

 

2011  

 

  

   6,000     2,000          $52.80     5/4/2021  
  

 

 

 

2010  

 

  

   20,000               $40.64     5/5/2020  
  

 

 

 

2009  

 

  

   10,000               $37.13     5/6/2019  
   

 

 

 

2008  

 

  

   5,000               $35.80     10/1/2018  

(1)   Unexercisable options granted by the Compensation Committee in 2013 were made based upon


23



recommendations by management on the basis of the factors set forth below2015, 2014, and endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer. As a practice, any option grant recommendations and subsequent option grants to the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Officers who reported directly to the Chief Executive Officer are made at the sole initiative and discretion of the Compensation Committee. The NEO who received stock option grants in 2013 were recommended and approved to receive stock options by the Compensation Committee.
The total number of stock options available to be granted in 2013 was determined by an annual shareholder vote as has been done the previous eight years. All options issued to employees in 2013 were granted with an exercise price equal to 100% of the closing market price on the grant date and will bevest 50% vested three years from the date of the grant 75% vested fourand an additional 25% will be vesting 4 and 5 years from the date of the grant, respectively. Unexercisable options granted in 2012 will vest 50% in 2016 and 100% vested five years from50% in 2017 on the anniversary day of the date of grant and have an expiration dategrant. Unexercisable options granted in 2011 will vest in 2016 on the anniversary day of ten years from the date of grant. The options are subject to earlier vesting under certain conditions set forth in the Option Plan. (See Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control).

44    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2015 regarding compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:

      

 

(a)

 

  

 

(b)

 

   

 

(c)

 

 

  Plan Category

 

    

 

Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants & Rights

 

  

 

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants & Rights

 

   

Number of Securities Available
for Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans  (Excluding
Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (1)

 

 

Equity Compensation Plans

Approvedby Security Holders

 

   18,731,197              $      43.39             3,061,508  

 

Equity Compensation Plans

Not Approved by Security Holders

 

      —                     

 

Total

 

   18,731,197              $      43.39             3,061,508  

(1)    Includes 2,794,758 available for issuance under the employee stock purchase plans, 81,300 available for future grants of stock options and 185,450 available for issuance of restricted stock.

45    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 2:

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

LOGO

The Board

of Directors

recommends

a voteFOR

this proposal.

The Company continues to make significant changes to NEO compensation, including:

•  Hired a compensation consulting firm to assist in evaluating changes to our executive compensation programs,

•  Continued to increase stock option awards to NEO without increasing total shares reserved for stock options, and

•  Continued to shift NEO compensation mx from cash to equity stock option awards.


We are asking for your non-binding advisory vote on the following resolution, known as “say-on-pay,” as required pursuant to section 14A of the Exchange Act:

Resolved:The vast majorityshareholders approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers.

We encourage you to read the Compensation Committee Report, includingCompensation Discussion and Analysis, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative to learn about our executive compensation programs and policies. The Board of Directors has elected to submit the non-binding vote on compensation of the Company’s NEO to shareholders on an annual basis.

At the 2014 Annual Meeting, only 44% of votes were cast for the non-binding vote to approve NEO compensation. The Compensation Committee considered these voting results and engaged with the shareholders to better understand their concerns. As a result of the shareholder feedback a number of changes to the NEO compensation program were implemented that are summarized underCompensation Committee Report.

At the 2015 Annual Meeting, 67% of votes were cast for the non-binding vote to approve NEO compensation. We have continued to solicit feedback from shareholders and hired a compensation consulting firm to evaluate further changes to our executive compensation programs.

The Company has always had a management compensation program heavily weighted on its non-equity incentive compensation plan, which management and the Board of Directors feel reinforces a proper and transparent alignment between management and shareholders’ interests in overall corporate performance. This alignment is further reinforced by the Company’s use of its equity incentive plan to grant stock options to many key employees, including its NEO. These incentive programs are designed with modest base salaries paid to NEO and other key employees. The Company strongly believes that any modification to the Company’s compensation philosophy or incentive programs could have a profound impact on the Company’s culture and operating philosophy, which would not be in the long-term interest of the Company’s shareholders.

The Company operates in the service industry and understands that the ability to attract and effectively motivate and manage “the best and brightest” is a critical differentiator to its objectives of providing the caliber of customer service that is the ultimate source of the Company’s performance. Accordingly, the Company uses a consistent, sound, easily described and administered compensation program, at all operating levels.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 2—Approval, on aNon-Binding, Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of Named Executive Officers.

Effect of Proposal

This say-on-pay proposal is non-binding on the Board of Directors. The approval or disapproval of this proposal by shareholders will not require the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee to take any action regarding NEO compensation. The final decision on NEO compensation remains with the Board of Directors and/or its Compensation Committee. Although non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding NEO compensation. The next non-binding say-on-frequency vote will be held at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting.

46    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 3:

APPROVE 2016

STOCK OPTION PLAN

Shareholders are being asked to approve and ratify the 2016 Stock Option Plan (the “2016 Option Plan”) to make available 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued Common Stock for purchase upon the exercise of options granted under the Plan. The 2016 Option Plan has been approved by the Board of Directors. Beginning in 2005, the Company instituted what it considers to be a very “pro-shareholder” policy of seeking annual shareholder approval of its proposed stock option grants. All grants made subsequent to these annual authorizations must be made by the 30th of April in the ensuing year. As of May 1, 2016, there will be no further shares of Common Stock available for grant pursuant to other stock option plans.

As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis portion of this Proxy Statement, an equity compensation program has historically been an important component of the Company’s overall compensation philosophy. The Company firmly believes that employee stock options provide a powerful means to align the interests of the Company’s management and employees with those of its shareholders. The Company does not have a general policy of providing employee pension plans. As such, management and the Board of Directors strongly believe that broad-based stock option grants are made annually atneed to be a continuing component of the meetingCompany’s overall compensation program. If the 2016 Option Plan is not approved, the Company will be unable to grant stock options to new or existing employees until such time as the shareholders approve a stock option plan in the future. Accordingly, management and the Board of Directors believe that a vote for the Company’s proposed 2016 Option Plan is essential to the Company’s ability to attract and retain the long-term services of its greatest asset which the Company relies upon to grow its business its people.

The 2016 Option Plan includes an annual limitation on the maximum number of shares that may be granted to any individual to meet the Section 162(m) exception for deductibility of performance-based compensation.

The Board of Directors has previously approved a non-discretionary stock repurchase plan which currently authorizes the repurchase of up to 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock with the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options outstanding under the plans noted below and the 2016 Stock Option Plan if approved. As of March 8, 2016, the Company had repurchased 30,230,892 shares of Common Stock under this non-discretionary repurchase plan. In addition, the Board of Directors has authorized a discretionary stock repurchase plan which allows for the repurchase of such shares as may be necessary to reduce the total shares outstanding to 180,000,000. It is the intent of the Board of Directors, immediately followingthat management make use of this discretionary authority to eliminate any further growth in the annual shareholders meeting. Thesenumber of issued and outstanding shares as a result of option exercises and to repurchase additional shares. As of March 8, 2016, the Company had repurchased 54,471,333 shares of Common Stock under this discretionary repurchase plan.

At March 8, 2016, a total 18,098,795 options to purchase shares of Common Stock were grantedoutstanding with ana weighted exercise price equal to the closing market price on the date of grant. The closing market price is the price at which the Company’s Common Stock was last sold on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date in question.

Factors that affect the amount$43.41 per share and weighted average remaining contractual life of stock options awarded to employees, including Executive Officers, are as follows:
amount of cumulative stock option grants the employee has received;
employee performance during the past 12 months, including promotions or other noteworthy accomplishments;
time elapsed since previous stock option grants;
amount of grants relative to peers within the Company; and
tenure with the Company and tenure in most recent position.
Stock options granted to each of the NEO in 2013 are as follows:
NamePosition2013 Stock Option Grants
Peter J. RoseChairman and Chief Executive Officer5,000
James L.K. WangPresident-Asia Pacific5,000
R. Jordan GatesPresident and Chief Operating Officer5,000
Robert L. VillanuevaPresident-The Americas5,000
Bradley S. PowellSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer5,000
5.7 years. Under the Company’s outstanding stock option plans and agreements thereunder, incentive and non-qualified stock options granted under the 2008 and succeeding Stock Option Plans will terminate upon the first to occur of:

(1) expiration of the option; (2) ninety90 days (or three months in the case of the Company’s 2009 through 20132015 Stock Option Plans and agreements thereunder) following the optionee’s termination of employment, other than as a result of death or disability; or (3) six months following the optionee’s death or cessation of employment by reason of disability. For options granted prior to the Company’s 2008 Stock Option Plan, incentive stock options will terminate upon the first to occur of: (1) expiration of the option; (2) termination of employment, other than as a result of death or disability; or (3) ninety90 days following the optionee’s death or cessation of employment by reason of disability.

The Company does not provide employee pension plans except in several instances outside the United States where required to do so by law. The equity incentive compensation program serves two purposes. First, the program provides the potential means for funding individual long-term financial goals (such as retirement, children’s education, etc.) by encouraging employees’ long-term commitment to creating shareholder value through continued, active service. Second, the program provides a disincentive to management and employees to make short-term business decisions to obtain short-term profits at the expense of long-term corporate and shareholder interests.

24



Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.
The Company has maintained a non-equity incentive compensation program for Executive Officers since its inception. In January 1985, the Compensation Committee fixed the aggregate amount of non-equity incentive compensation under the program to 10% of pre-bonus operating income (the "Bonus Pool" as previously defined above). The Compensation Committee also considered the aggregate amount of discretionary bonuses paid to Executive Officers in each of the years from 1982 to 1984, which approximated 10% of operating income during those years.
The Compensation Committee believes that setting the Bonus Pool at a fixed percentage of operating income, with fluctuations in amounts paid tied to actual changes in operating income, provides both a better incentive to the Executive Officers than discretionary bonuses or targeted performance goals, and a more direct relationship between each executive’s incentive compensation and shareholders’ return. By placing emphasis on growth in operating income, any change in compensation is directly proportional to the profit responsibility of the Executive Officers.
On May 7, 2008, the shareholders adopted the 2008 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Executive Incentive Compensation Plan”). The Executive Incentive Compensation Plan recognizes and rewards, on an annual basis, selected Company Executives and other key employees for their contributions to the overall success of the Company and qualifies compensation paid under this Plan as “performance-based compensation” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The 2008 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan replaced the 1997 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
All Executive Officers of the Company who receive an annual base salary equal to or less than $120,000 are eligible for inclusion in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Individual eligibility and allocation is determined quarterly. Under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, any portion of the Bonus Pool which is not allocated by action of the Compensation Committee may be allocated to key employees determined to be eligible at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer. However, allocations made by the Chief Executive Officer cannot increase the compensation of any NEO nor can such an allocation cause any individual to become a NEO.
The Compensation Committee exerts independent oversight and utilizes a disciplined methodology to review and approve all allocations of percentages assigned to participating Executive Officers and other key employees. Factors that contribute to this methodology are:
Historical role within the Company. The Executives having the two highest percentages of the Bonus Pool, Peter J. Rose, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and James L.K. Wang, President—Asia Pacific were founding employees of the Company. The relatively significant portions of this Bonus Pool awarded to these individuals are in partial recognition of their role as founders and their cumulative experience managing the Company. In addition, each of their shares of the Bonus Pool reflects the significant influence each has played in maximizing corporate profits and thereby increasing shareholder value, since the Company became a public entity in September of 1984. It should be noted, however, that the relative percentage of the Bonus Pool for each of these founding employees continues to diminish over time as additional Executives participate in the program. Since 2003, as more participants have been added to the program, the relative percentage of the Bonus Pool allocated to Mr. Rose and Mr. Wang both decreased by approximately 37%. With respect to the other NEO, the relative percentages have changed over time due to a variety of factors. The relative percentage allocated to Mr. Villanueva has declined by approximately 26% over this same time period. Mr. Gates’ portion of the Bonus Pool has declined by approximately 17% since his appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer effective January 1, 2008. Mr. Powell's portion of the Bonus Pool declined 2% in 2013.
Function and responsibility.Executives who are in charge of major geographical regions (such as the Americas, Asia Pacific and the EMAIR [Europe, Middle East, African and Indian sub-continent] regions) or major product and service functions (such as air, ocean, brokerage, product management, information technology, marketing, legal, accounting and finance) reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer or the President and Chief Operating Officer, are generally allotted a higher percentage of the Bonus Pool than those serving in other capacities. The length of time an executive has been with the Company and the resulting experience of the

25



executive, his or her role during that time and his or her contribution to increasing corporate profits and shareholder value all contribute to the amount of compensation an executive receives under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
Tenure with the Company and tenure in position. The longer an executive has participated in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, the more money he or she is eligible to earn as the Company’s operating income grows. At the same time, the longer an executive participates in the Bonus Pool (as was the case with most of the NEO as discussed above), the smaller his or her percentage of the Bonus Pool becomes over time as more executives participate in the pool. The Company’s philosophy is to have each individual participant gradually receive a smaller percentage of a larger Bonus Pool over time.
Adjustments, performance and promotion.From time to time, as older executives retire and new executives are promoted into a new position and/or added to the program, the relative percentages are adjusted. Adjustments can also made to give recognition to promotions, achievements and other noteworthy accomplishments.
Amounts earned by all participants in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (over 100 participants) during 2013 totaled $61,341,000, of which $42,180,000 was paid to Executive Officers. Amounts earned by NEO from the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan during 2013 and each NEO share of the available Bonus Pool as approved by the Compensation Committee are as follows:
Name Position % of Pool 2013 Amount Earned
Peter J. Rose Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 8.8% $5,368,337
James L.K. Wang President-Asia Pacific 8.3% $5,076,579
R. Jordan Gates President and Chief Operating Officer 6.9% $4,201,306
Robert L. Villanueva President-The Americas 6.4% $3,909,549
Bradley S. Powell Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 4.4% $2,706,051
While the Company has never incurred an annual or quarterly operating loss since going public in September 1984, such a loss would result in a moratorium on any kind of compensation payments under the non-equity incentive compensation program. The participants in the program would not be entitled to, nor would they expect, any form of payments under the program. More importantly, no further non-equity incentive compensation program payments would be due or payable to participating executives until future operating income surpassed the operating loss previously incurred. At that time, non-equity incentive compensation would only be due for the portion of cumulative profitability beyond the value of the profits offsetting the operating loss. More simply put, any operating losses must be made up by operating income, in the aggregate, before permitting further payments under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan.
This also applies across yearly reporting cycles. Were the Company to incur an operating loss in the fourth quarter and record operating income in the first quarter of the ensuing year, the amount of pre-bonus operating income earned in the first quarter must exceed the amount of loss in the previous quarter before any Bonus Pool payments would be due. This would also apply to a situation where operating income, for years which have previously been audited and reported upon, is subsequently adjusted downward. In that situation, no payments under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan would be due until future operating income results exceed the amount of the downward adjustment. The Compensation Committee believes that the combination of the Company’s short operating cycle and this compensation structure, which emphasizes cumulative operating income, discourages management from taking unreasonable risks related to the Company’s business. No additional payments would ever be due if such adjustments increased previously reported fiscal year operating income. The compensation paid to Executive Officers and other key employees is weighted heavily toward the non-equity incentive compensation, which the Company believes is an essential part of risk oversight. The percentage of total compensation paid to our NEO under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan ranged from 94% to 97% in 2013. This excludes the retirement bonus for Mr. Rose.
The portion of the Bonus Pool that is allocated to each NEO, or other participating Executive Officers, is approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each quarter and the corresponding quarterly distributions are made

26



subsequent to filing the Company’s Form 10-Q or Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual amounts are only paid subsequent to review by, and receipt of written approval from, the Compensation Committee.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
From a philosophical standpoint, the Company does not provide Executive Officers, named and otherwise, and key employees with perquisites and personal benefits that are not available to all employees. The Company provides standard benefits packages to all employees which vary country by country based on individual country regulations. In the United States, for instance, the Company pays 100% of the medical, dental and vision insurance premiums, as well as offering a matching contribution of $.50 for each $1.00 of employee savings, up to a maximum annual Company contribution of $1,500 per qualified employee, under an employee savings plan intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code. The Company believes that the compensation potential available from the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan are sufficiently attractive that the reliance on other forms of exclusive perquisites and benefits are not necessary to enable the Company to attract and retain superior employees for key positions.
In finalizing Mr. Rose's Succession Agreement, fees totaling $45,623 for legal and tax advice were paid by the Company on his behalf.
The Company does not believe that the aggregate value of any perquisites for any NEO, other than the amounts described above related to Mr. Rose's Succession Agreement, exceeds $10,000 per year.
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with all of the NEO which provide for the base salaries as indicated above. Each of the employment agreements is automatically renewable upon expiration for additional one-year periods unless either party elects otherwise.
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
On February 24, 2014, the Board adopted a policy regarding executive stock ownership guidelines. These stock ownership guidelines are applicable to the Company’s Executive Officers, including the NEO, and other Senior Managers holding a title of Senior Vice President or above. These guidelines are designed to increase executives’ equity stakes in the Company and to further align executives’ interests more closely with those of shareholders. The guidelines require covered executives to own shares of the Company’s common stock sufficient to satisfy the amount specified below as a multiple of the executive’s annual base salary:

LOGO

Chief Executive Officer15 x Base Salary
President or Executive Vice President10 x Base Salary
Senior Vice President5 x Base Salary
Executives in the positions above will need to achieve the corresponding ownership target within five years of promotion to the position or within five years of the policy adoption date. This policy excludes stock option grants from the ownership calculation and is governed by the Compensation Committee.
Insider Trading Policy Prohibits Hedging

The Board

of Directors

recommends

The Company's Insider Trading Policy prohibits its Board of Directors and employees from hedging their ownership of Expeditors stock, including trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to Expeditors stock.


27



Succession Agreement
On October 7, 2013 the Company and Peter J. Rose, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer entered into a Succession Agreement. Mr. Rose retired as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective March 1, 2014 and expects to remain Chairman of the Board of Directors until the annual meeting of shareholders in May 2015. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Rose will receive a retirement bonus equal to the amount he would have received under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for 2014 and the first five months of 2015, assuming that Mr. Rose received the same percentage of the Bonus Pool under the Plan that was used to calculate his incentive compensation for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The Company currently estimates that the total retirement bonus will be $7,955,000 and recorded that amount in its entirety in the fourth quarter of 2013. As allowed by the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Company will not reallocate Mr. Rose’s current percentage of the available Bonus Pool to other officers or key employees until actual payments made to Mr. Rose under the Succession Agreement are complete and an amount equal to the total retirement bonus paid has been recouped. In short, Mr. Rose's retirement bonus will be funded by reducing the amounts otherwise available to Executive Officers or other key employees under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan until paid in full and as a result there will be no cumulative impact on net earnings available to shareholders or on cash flow.
Estimated amount of the retirement bonus accrued in 2013 and payable to Mr. Rose in 2014 and 2015 under the Succession Agreement$7,955,000
Estimated reduction of the Bonus Pool expense and payments in 2014 and 2015 under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan$(7,955,000)
Cumulative impact on net earnings available to shareholders and on cash flow$-0-
The amount accrued in 2013 and the anticipated reductions to the Bonus Pool above will change in equal and offsetting amounts based on the Company's actual operating income in 2014 and the first five months of 2015.
Appointment of New Chief Executive Officer
Effective March 1, 2014, Jeffrey S. Musser was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Previously, Mr. Musser was the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer. In 2013, Mr. Musser was paid a base salary of $100,000, earned $3,270,602 from the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and was awarded a stock option grant of 10,000 shares with a fair value of $121,601. Mr. Musser will participate in the same compensation programs in 2014.
Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control
The employment agreement for each NEO, contains a covenant not to compete which allows the Company to extend the restriction on competition with the Company for six months following termination of the employment relationship. The extension is at the sole discretion of the Company unless the employee terminates the employment relationship by resigning during a specified period surrounding a “change in control,” as defined and discussed below, in which case the employee may decline any accompanying lump sum payment and thereby avoid the accompanying restriction on competition.
The Company regularly grants stock options to its employees including the NEO. The stock options granted under the Company’s stock option plans for employees vest at the rate of 50% three years from the date of grant, an additional 25% four years from the date of grant and the balance five years from the date of grant. However, these option plans all provide that outstanding options will become immediately vested and fully exercisable in connection with the occurrence of a “change in control” of the Company.
“Change in Control” means either of the following: (i) when any person (with certain exceptions) becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% of the Company’s then outstanding securities or (ii) when shareholder approval is obtained for a transaction involving the sale of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company or a merger of the Company with or into another company.

28



The following tables illustrate the payments due to each of the NEO in the event of termination under either “for cause” or “without cause”.
Name(3) For Cause(1) 
For Cause with Non-
Compete Agreement(1)
 Without Cause(2)
James L.K. Wang $
 $50,000
 $2,588,290
R. Jordan Gates $
 $50,000
 $2,150,653
Robert L. Villanueva $
 $50,000
 $2,004,775
Bradley S. Powell $
 $50,000
 $1,403,026
___________________
*All amounts are based upon calculations at December 31, 2013.
(1)When terminating an Executive Officer for cause, the Company may, in its sole discretion, enforce the non-compete provision contained in the employment agreements for a lump sum payment representing 50% of the Executive Officer’s base salary. voteFOR

this proposal.

The term “cause” as defined by the employment agreement is any act of an Executive Officer, which in the reasonable judgment of the Board of Directors constitutes dishonesty, larceny, fraud, deceit, gross negligence,strongly believes that employee stock options provide:

  a crime involving moral turpitude, willful misrepresentationpowerful means to shareholders, directors or officers or material breachalign the interests of employees with those of its shareholders,

•  an important tool for employee retention, and

•  a valuable long-term benefit to employees in lieu of pension plans.

Stock options only provide compensation to the employment agreement. The non-compete provision is automatically extended except in circumstances discussed above.

(2)When terminating an Executive without cause, the Company must pay the Executive Officer cash compensation in a lump sum amount equal to 50% of his or her base salary plus 50% of the amount of the preceding twelve months of non-equity incentive compensation.
(3)Mr. Rose is not included due to his retirement effective March 1, 2014 that makes this scenario inapplicable.
The following table and accompanying narrative illustrates the payments that would be due to each of the NEO under several possible “change in control” scenarios.
  Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
  
Accelerated Vesting of
Stock Options
Based on Change in  Control
 
Resign or
Terminated for
Cause
 
Terminated for
Cause with
Non-Compete
Agreement
 
Terminated
Without
Cause
Name(2) Shares Realized Gain(1) 
James L.K. Wang 5,000
 $44,650
 $
 $50,000
 $2,588,290
R. Jordan Gates 5,000
 $44,650
 $
 $50,000
 $2,150,653
Robert L. Villanueva 11,750
 $53,550
 $
 $50,000
 $2,004,775
Bradley S. Powell 35,500
 $133,650
 $
 $50,000
 $1,403,026
___________________
(1)
The realized gain was calculated based on a closing market price ofoptionee if the Company’s Common Stock of $44.25 per share at December 31, 2013, multiplied bystock price appreciates above the number of each NEO unvested stock options at that date, which would immediately vest in the event of a change in control as of that date, less the aggregate amount that would be required to be paid to exercise the options.
(2)Mr. Rose is not included due to his retirement effective March 1, 2014 that makes this scenario inapplicable.
Scenario 1:No changes are made in management as a result of a change in control as described above. NEO would receive the realized gainfair market value on acceleration of unvested stock options shown in Column 1.
Scenario 2:NEO employment agreements are terminated with cause subsequent to a change in control. Amounts due would include the realized gain on acceleration of unvested stock options under Column 1. No amounts are due to the NEO under Column 2. At the Company’s discretion, as noted above, for a lump sum payment of half the NEO base salary under Column 3, the Company could invoke the non-compete provisions contained in the employment agreement.
Scenario 3:NEO resigns subsequent to a change in control.The NEO would be entitled to the realized gain on the acceleration of unvested stock options under Column 1. The NEO would not be entitled to any cash compensation. The Company could, in its sole discretion, pay the NEO a lump sum amount under Column 3 in exchange for invoking the non-compete provisions in the employment agreement. In a change in control situation, the NEO has the option to reject or to

29



accept this lump sum payment. By rejecting the payment, the executive will no longer be subject to the non-compete provisions of the employment agreement.
Scenario 4NEO employment agreements are terminated without cause subsequent to the change in control. Amounts due would include the realized gain on the acceleration of unvested stock options shown in Column 1. In addition, the NEO would be entitled to receive cash compensation based on one-half of base salary plus one-half of the amount of the Bonus Pool payment received by the executive in the preceding twelve months under Column 4. Under the terms of the employment agreement, when an executive is terminated without cause, the non-compete provisions remain in effect for six-months from the date of termination.
Other Retirement or Disability Payments.The Company has no formal retirement obligations to make any payments to any Executive Officer upon his or her death, disability or retirement except to Executive Officers domiciled in countries where statutory regulation require that these benefits be provided to all employees.
While there is no legal or contractual obligation to do so, the Company has, on occasion, accelerated the vesting of any unvested stock options of employees who pass away.
Policy on Deductibility of Compensation.Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Federal income tax deduction for certain types of compensation paid to certain of the NEO, is limited to $1,000,000 per NEO per taxable year unless such compensation meets certain requirements. The Compensation Committee believes that this limitation will not apply to compensation accrued in 2014. In making future compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee intends to take into account and mitigate to the extent feasible the effect of Section 162(m) as it discharges its responsibilities, although in certain cases the Compensation Committee may award compensation to NEO which are not fully deductible as a result of this limitation. (Please refer to page 37 for further discussion concerning the deductibility of compensation relating to the proposed 2014 Stock Option Plan.)
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based payments including its Stock Option Plans, Restricted Stock Program and Employee Stock Purchase Plan in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (ASC Topic 718).

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John W. Meisenbach, Chairman
Michael J. Malone
Robert R. Wright


30



SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
The table below summarizes the total compensation earned by each of the NEO for each of the fiscal years shown. The Company has entered into employment and indemnification agreements with all of the NEO.
The NEO were not entitled to receive payments which would be characterized as “Bonus” payments for the fiscal years shown. Amounts listed under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” were determined based on percentages of the Bonus Pool that were allocated to each NEO by the Compensation Committee based on the factors described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained herein.
Excluding the retirement bonus for Mr. Rose (see Note 1 below), salary for the NEO in 2013 accounted for approximately 2% and “Option Awards” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” accounted for approximately 98% of the total compensation of the NEO. Benefits accounted for less than 1% of the total compensation of NEO.
The following table sets out the type and amount of compensation paid to each NEO for the years ended December 31:
Name and Position
Year
Salary
Option
Awards(4)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(5)

All Other
Compensation(6)

Total
Peter J. Rose(1)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

2013
$110,000

$60,800

$5,368,337

$8,002,123

$13,541,260
2012
$110,000

$

$5,330,260

$1,500

$5,441,760
2011
$110,000

$

$6,695,888

$1,500

$6,807,388
James L.K. Wang(2)
President-Asia Pacific

2013
$100,000

$60,800

$5,076,579

$

$5,237,379
2012
$100,000

$

$5,063,929

$

$5,163,929
2011
$100,000

$

$6,293,532

$

$6,393,532
R. Jordan Gates
President and Chief Operating Officer

2013
$100,000

$60,800

$4,201,306

$1,500

$4,363,606
2012
$100,000

$

$4,204,942

$1,500

$4,306,442
2011
$100,000

$

$5,320,683

$1,500

$5,422,183
Robert L. Villanueva(3)
President-The Americas

2013
$100,000

$60,800

$3,909,549

$1,500

$4,071,849
2012
$100,000

$

$3,938,613

$1,500

$4,040,113
2011
$100,000

$115,088

$4,991,643

$1,500

$5,208,231
Bradley S. Powell
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

2013
$100,000

$60,800

$2,706,051

$1,500

$2,868,351

2012
$100,000

$146,475

$2,672,630

$1,500

$2,920,605

2011
$100,000

$167,400

$3,102,539

$1,500

$3,371,439
___________________
(1)All Other Compensation includes an estimated accrual of $7,955,000 recorded as of December 31, 2013 for a retirement bonus pursuant to Mr. Rose's succession agreement. The retirement bonus will be equal to the amount he would have received under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for 2014 and the first five months of 2015, assuming that Mr. Rose received the same percentage of the Bonus Pool under the Plan that was used to calculate his incentive compensation for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Payments to Mr. Rose will start in September 2014 and extend through August 2015 and will be calculated as a percentage of the Company's quarterly pre-bonus operating income for 2014 through the second quarter of 2015. Actual amounts paid may differ based on future operating income. As allowed by the Plan, the Compensation Committee will not reallocate Mr. Rose's current percentage of the available Bonus Pool to other Executive Officers or key employees until actual payments made to Mr. Rose under the Succession Agreement are complete and an amount equal to the total retirement bonus has been recouped. In short, Mr. Rose's retirement bonus will be funded by reducing the amounts otherwise available to Executive Officers or other key employees under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan until paid in full. This amount also includes $45,623 in fees for legal and tax advice related to Mr. Rose's Succession Agreement.
(2)Mr. Wang is a resident of Taiwan and a substantial portion of his base salary is paid in an estimated equivalent of New Taiwan Dollars. Any amount by which the currency fluctuations exceeded his $100,000 base salary is subtracted from his final payment due under the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.
(3)Mr. Villanueva was not a NEO of the Company in 2012.

31



(4)
This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted in each of the years presented. All assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the option awards are included in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2014.
(5)The payments were made pursuant to the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, as described under the caption “Executive Compensation – Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.” The amounts listed were earned during the fiscal year.
(6)These amounts include the Company’s matching contributions of $.50 for each $1.00 of employee savings, up to a maximum annual Company contribution of $1,500 per qualified employee, under an employee savings plan intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE
The following table sets forth certain information regarding awards granted during 2013 to the NEO. For more information regarding each award, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement.
    
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan  Awards(1)
 
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(2)
 
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards(3)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Option
Awards(4)
Name Grant Date Threshold Target Maximum   
Peter J. Rose 05/01/2013 
 $5,368,337
 
 5,000
 $35.32
 $60,800
James L.K. Wang 05/01/2013 
 $5,076,579
 
 5,000
 $35.32
 $60,800
R. Jordan Gates 05/01/2013 
 $4,201,306
 
 5,000
 $35.32
 $60,800
Robert L. Villanueva 05/01/2013 
 $3,909,549
 
 5,000
 $35.32
 $60,800
Bradley S. Powell 05/01/2013 
 $2,706,051
 
 5,000
 $35.32
 $60,800
 ___________________
(1)The total amount available to Executive Officers participating in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, including all NEO, is limited to 10% of pre-bonus operating income. Individual amounts earned under this plan are determined by participation percentages approved by the Compensation Committee. The Company does not use thresholds or targets or maximums in determining levels of compensation.
(2)
The above grants were made pursuant to the Company’s 2013 Stock Option Plan. All options granted in fiscal 2013 are subject to a vesting schedule. Subject to earlier vesting under certain conditions set forth in the Option Plan, 50% of the options will be exercisable commencing three years from the date of the grant and an additional 25% will be exercisable four and five years from the date of the grant, respectively. (See “Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control”). The options expire ten years from the date of the grant. The grant to Mr. Rose was canceled upon his retirement as CEO of the Company effective March 1, 2014.

(3)The exercise price is the market closing price of the underlying security on the grant date.
(4)
All assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the option awards are included in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2014.

OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUE TABLES
The following tables set forth certain information regarding options exercised and held by the NEO.
Options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2013:
  Option Exercises
Name 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
 
Value Realized
on Exercise(1)
Peter J. Rose 11,822
 $222,963
James L.K. Wang 50,000
 $956,500
R. Jordan Gates 
 $
Robert L. Villanueva 
 $
Bradley S. Powell 
 $
 ___________________
(1)Represents the difference between the market price of the Company’s Common Stock at exercise and the exercise price of the options, multiplied by the number of options exercised.

32



Outstanding option awards at December 31, 2013:
  Option Awards
  
 
Year of
Grant
 
Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number  of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
 
Exercise or
Base Price
 
Expiration
Date
Name Exercisable Unexercisable(2) 
Peter J. Rose (1) 2013 
 5,000
  $35.32
 5/1/2023
  2008 5,000
 
  $46.94
 5/7/2018
James L.K. Wang 2013 
 5,000
  $35.32
 5/1/2023
  2008 5,000
 
  $46.94
 5/7/2018
  2005 20,000
 
  $24.45
 5/4/2015
R. Jordan Gates 2013 
 5,000
  $35.32
 5/1/2023
  2008 5,000
 
  $46.94
 5/7/2018
  2007 5,000
 
  $42.90
 5/2/2017
  2005 11,822
 
  $24.45
 5/4/2015
Robert L. Villanueva 2013 
 5,000
  $35.32
 5/1/2023
  2011 
 5,500
  $52.80
 5/6/2021
  2009 3,750
 1,250
  $37.13
 5/6/2019
  2008 5,000
 
  $46.94
 5/7/2018
  2007 5,000
 
  $42.90
 5/2/2017
  2006 10,000
 
  $43.88
 5/3/2016
  2005 11,822
 
  $24.45
 5/4/2015
Bradley S. Powell 2013 
 5,000
  $35.32
 5/1/2023
  2012 
 10,000
  $40.74
 5/2/2022
  2011 
 8,000
  $52.80
 5/4/2021
  2010 10,000
 10,000
  $40.64
 5/5/2020
  2009 7,500
 2,500
  $37.13
 5/6/2019
  2008 5,000
 
  $35.80
 10/1/2018
___________________
(1)Mr. Rose's unexercisable options were canceled upon his retirement as Chief Executive Officer

47    |    Notice of the Company effective March 1, 2014.

(2)Unexercisable options granted in 2013, 2012 and 2011 will vest 50% three years from the date of the grant and an additional 25% will be vesting four and five years from the date of the grant, respectively. Unexercisable options granted in 2010 will vest 50% in 2014 and 50% in 2015 on the anniversary day of the date of grant. Unexercisable options granted in 2009 will vest in 2014 on the anniversary day of the date of grant.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2013 regarding compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.
  (a) (b) (c)
Plan Category 
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(1)
 
Weighted-Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(2)
 
Number of Securities
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))(3)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders 18,530,140
 $41.02
 1,450,121
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders 
 
 
Total 18,530,140
 $41.02
 1,450,121
___________________ 
(1)
Does not include 35,868 for restricted stock awards that were not fully vested as of December 31, 2013.
(2)The weighted-average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards which have no exercise price.
(3)
Includes 1,165,971 available for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 284,150 available for future grants of stock options. These Plans consist of the Company’s 2013 Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

33



PROPOSAL 2—NON-BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF
THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Company recognizes that there continues to be a considerable focus in the public eye on executive compensation. This focus has been primarily caused by widely publicized instances of abusive executive compensation practices that have been inconsistent with corporate financial performance, excessive risk taking and/or excessive perquisites. Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires publicly-traded companies, including the Company, to submit the compensation methodology and amounts for its NEO to the shareholders for a non-binding vote, known as “say-on-pay.” The Company believes that since becoming a publicly-traded company in 1984, its own historical track record regarding executive compensation practices, including its NEO compensation, stands in stark contrast to the kinds of inconsistent pay practices, risk taking or excessive perquisites that have drawn the aforementioned public scrutiny. In 2013, compensation of the Company's NEO was approved by 86% of votes cast. The Board of Directors has elected to submit the non-binding vote on compensation of the Company's NEO to shareholders on an annual basis.
The Company has always had a management compensation program heavily weighted on its non-equity incentive compensation plan, which management and the Board of Directors feel reinforces a proper and transparent alignment between management and shareholders’ interests in overall corporate performance. As a result of a 4% increase in the Company's operation income from 2012 to 2013 and a lower relative percentage of the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan bonus pool ("Bonus Pool") allocated to NEO, compensation of NEO in 2013 increased approximately 1% from 2012, excluding the retirement bonus for Mr. Rose (see below). This alignment is further reinforced by the Company’s broad-based use of its equity incentive plan to grant stock options to many key employees. These incentive programs are designed with comparatively modest base salaries paid to its Executive Officers and other key employees, including its NEO, which would be incidental to the amount that could be earned from the equity and non-equity incentive compensation programs. The Company believes that its compensation philosophy has also been a critical factor in sustaining its long-term track record of above market shareholder returns. The Company strongly believes that any modification to the Company’s compensation philosophy or incentive programs could have a profound impact on the Company’s culture and operating philosophy, which would not be in the long-term interest of the Company's shareholders.
The Company operates in the service industry and understands that the ability to attract and effectively motivate and manage “the best and brightest” is a critical differentiator to its objectives of providing the caliber of customer service that is the ultimate source of the Company’s performance. Compensation is the Company’s largest overhead expense (78% in 2013). Accordingly, the Company uses a consistent, sound, easily described and administered compensation program, at all operating levels. Finally, it has always been the Company’s belief that shareholder and corporate interests are not met by lavishing extensive perquisites on its Executive Officers beyond those generally available to all the Company’s employees. As a consequence, there are no extraordinary perquisites granted to Executive Officers beyond usual and reasonable perquisites available to most, if not all, employees.
To effectively cast a vote on this compensation proposal, it is critical that shareholders be knowledgeable about the Company’s compensation philosophy from both a historical perspective and impact on future performance. Shareholders are encouraged to review the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) beginning on page 15, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative in detail and spend the requisite time to appropriately understand the particular reasons for the Company’s request for continued shareholder support for its compensation programs before casting their votes.
The Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee and management believe that the Company's compensation programs are one of the unique characteristics responsible for differentiating the Company's performance from that of many of its competitors. From the Company's perspective, the manner and degree to which each of these components has been utilized in combination with the others has had a direct impact on the Company’s short-term and long-term financial performance. Furthermore, this combined compensation program has a proven track record of aligning both the short-term and long-term interests of the Company’s key employees, including the Company’s NEO, with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders. For these reasons, the Company is committed to keeping these programs intact.

34



As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, the Company's Compensation Programs consist of the following key components and philosophies:
Base SalaryProvide a fixed, modest base salary that is intended to be substantially lower than comparable base salaries for similar positions in the industry.
Equity Incentive CompensationUtilize a broad-based plan that closely aligns the long-term interests of management and key employees with the long-term interests of shareholders by awarding annual stock option grants to a significant number of both management and key employees that vest over five years from date of grant. Consistent with past practices, in 2013, stock options were granted to approximately 3,400 key employees, including all NEOs.
Non-Equity Incentive CompensationIncentivize Executive Officers and other key employees, including the Company’s NEO, with a consistent performance driven plan that has no built-in bias which favors or enriches management in a manner inconsistent with overall corporate performance. This plan -- the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan -- is intended to provide the largest component of management compensation thereby aligning the interests of management with the goals of the Company and long-term returns to the shareholders.
This plan is based on a fixed percentage of the cumulative operating income of the Company controlled by each key employee, with no upper limit on the potential dollar amount that can be earned through sustained business growth. By placing emphasis on growth in operating income, any change in compensation is directly proportional to the profit responsibility of the individual.
The plan is based on cumulative operating income and, therefore, any operating losses must be made up by future operating income, in the aggregate, before permitting further payments under this program.
Payments to Executive Officers and other key employees under this plan are allocated from a pool consisting of 10% of pre-bonus operating income. The Compensation Committee exerts independent oversight and utilizes a disciplined methodology to review and approve all allocations of percentages assigned to participating Executive Officers and other key employees. Allocations of the pool to individual executives is based on their historical role in the Company, function and responsibility, tenure with the Company, tenure in the position, adjustments as executives retire and new executives are added to the program, promotions, achievements and other noteworthy accomplishments.
Perquisites and Other BenefitsAs a matter of policy, the Company does not provide NEO with perquisites and personal benefits that are not available to all employees. The Company do not provide employee pension plans except in several isolated instances outside the United States where required to do so by law. Any departures from this policy, such as the retirement bonus for Mr. Rose, require the specific authorization by the Board (see "Peter J. Rose Retirement Bonus" below).

35



The effectiveness of the alignment of our Compensation Programs with Company performance is demonstrated by comparing the year-over-year impact on 2013, 2012 and 2011 NEO compensation as follows:
  2013 2012
Percentage change in operating income from prior year 4% (14)%
Average percentage change in total compensation earned for the NEO, excluding the retirement bonus for Mr. Rose (see note below) 1% (20)%
Peter J. Rose Retirement Bonus
In recognition of Mr. Rose's role as co-founder of the Company and acknowledgment of the significant increases in shareholder value during his 25 year tenure as CEO, the Board has authorized a retirement bonus as part of his Succession Agreement under the provisions described below. The retirement bonus will be equal to the amount he would have received under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for 2014 and the first five months of 2015, assuming that Mr. Rose received the same percentage of the Bonus Pool under the Plan that was used to calculate his incentive compensation for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Payments to Mr. Rose will start in September 2014 and extend through August 2015 and will be calculated as a percentage of the Company's quarterly pre-bonus operating income for 2014 through the second quarter of 2015. Actual amounts paid may differ based on future operating income. As allowed by the Plan, the Compensation Committee will not reallocate Mr. Rose's current percentage of the available Bonus Pool to other Executive Officers or key employees until actual payments made to Mr. Rose under the Succession Agreement are complete and an amount equal to the total retirement bonus has been recouped. In short, Mr. Rose's retirement bonus will be funded by reducing the amounts otherwise available to Executive Officers or other key employees under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan until paid in full and as a result there will be no cumulative impact on net earnings available to shareholders or on cash flow.
Estimated amount of the retirement bonus accrued in 2013 and payable to Mr. Rose in 2014 and 2015 under the Succession Agreement$7,955,000
Estimated reduction of the Bonus Pool expense and payments in 2014 and 2015 under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan$(7,955,000)
Cumulative impact on net earnings available to shareholders and on cash flow$-0-
The amount accrued in 2013 and the anticipated reductions to the Bonus Pool above will change in equal and offsetting amounts based on the Company's actual operating income in 2014 and the first five months of 2015.
Accordingly, shareholders are asked to approve on a non-binding basis at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders the compensation of the Company’s NEO as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative in this& Proxy Statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A NON-BINDING VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
Effect of Proposal
This “say-on-pay” proposal is non-binding on the Board of Directors. The approval or disapproval of this proposal by shareholders will not require the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee to take any action regarding compensation of NEO. The final decision on the compensation of the Company’s NEO remains with the Board of Directors and/or its Compensation Committee. As the Company believes its compensation programs are one of the unique characteristics responsible for differentiating its performance from that of many of its competitors, any significant changes to these compensation programs could affect the Company’s performance. Although non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding the Company’s compensation of NEO. Unless the Board of Directors modifies its policy on the frequency of

36
Statement






37



future say-on-pay non-binding votes, the next say-on-pay non-binding vote will be held at the Company's 2015 Annual Meeting.

PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF THE 2014NO. 3: APPROVE 2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis portion of this Proxy Statement, a broad-based equity compensation program has historically been an important component of the Company’s overall compensation philosophy. The Company encourages its shareholders to review the particular reasons for requesting continued shareholder support for its equity incentive compensation programs as described on page 18 of this Proxy Statement. The Company recognizes that due to some rather notorious past abuses by other companies, a sentiment of caution surrounding the practice of granting stock options might exist in the minds of some shareholders. However, the Company also firmly believes that when used in a broad-based format, employee stock options provide a powerful means to align the interests of the Company’s employees with those of its shareholders. To address any possible shareholder reservations, in 2005, the Company instituted what it considers to be a very “pro-shareholder” policy of seeking annual shareholder approval of its proposed stock option grants. All grants made subsequent to these annual authorizations must be made by the 30th of April in the ensuing year.
As in prior years, the primary beneficiaries of the proposed 2014 Stock Option Plan will be the non-executive officers of the Company. Over the last three years, in the aggregate, the Executive Officers have received the following percentages of total stock options granted:
20112%
20121%
20133%
Management and the Board of Directors feel strongly that broad-based stock option grants need to be a continuing component of the Company’s overall compensation program. Particularly since the Company does not have a general policy of providing employee pension plans. If the 2014 Stock Option Plan is not approved, the Company will be unable to grant stock options to new or existing employees until such time as the shareholders approve a stock option plan in the future. Accordingly, Management and the Board of Directors believe that a vote against the Company’s proposed 2014 stock option program could harm the Company’s ability to attract and retain the long-term services of its greatest asset which the Company relies upon to grow its business...its people.

At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be asked to approve and ratify the Company’s 2014 Stock Option Plan, which, if approved, will make available 2,750,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued Common Stock for purchase upon exercise of options granted under the Plan. Approximately 14,000 individuals would be eligible to receive options under the 2014 Stock Option Plan. In 2013, options were granted to approximately 3,400 key employees under the 2013 Stock Option Plan. The 2014 Stock Option Plan includes an annual limitation on the maximum number of shares that may be granted to any individual to meet the Section 162(m) exception for deductibility of performance-based compensation. A summary of the 2014 Stock Option Plan is described below, and the 2014 Stock Option Plan can be viewed in its entirety in Appendix A of this Proxy Statement. In addition, the proposed 2014 Stock Option Agreement can be viewed in its entirety in Appendix B of this Proxy Statement.


38



At March 6, 2014,8, 2016, the following options to purchase shares of Common Stock were outstanding by plan:

  Option Plan

Number of Shares Outstanding  

 
Option PlanNumber of Shares Outstanding
1997 Stock Option Plan313,498
2005 Stock Option Plan979,002

2006 Stock Option Plan

1,881,133
724,912  

2007 Stock Option Plan

1,198,803
845,459  

2008 Stock Option Plan

1,615,287
1,278,080  

2009 Stock Option Plan

1,846,344
1,116,365  

2010 Stock Option Plan

2,165,360
1,425,006  

2011 Stock Option Plan

2,668,690
2,386,700  

2012 Stock Option Plan

2,660,090
2,149,498  

2013 Stock Option Plan

2,695,950
2,691,075  

2014 Stock Option Plan

2,383,950  

2015 Stock Option Plan

2,905,750  

1993 Directors’ Plan

288,000
192,000  
Total(1)

Total

18,312,157
18,098,795  
___________________
(1)
The weighted average exercise price of these options was $41.12 and the weighted average remaining contractual life was 5.7 years.
If Proposal 3 is approved on May 7, 2014, 2,750,000 shares of Common Stock will be available for grant pursuant to the 2014 Stock Option Plan. As of May 1, 2014, there will be no further shares of Common Stock available for grant pursuant to other stock option plans.

The Board of Directors has approved a non-discretionary stock repurchase plan which currently authorizes the repurchase of up to 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock with the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options outstanding under the plans noted above and the 2014unanimously recommends that Shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 3—Approval Of The 2016 Stock Option Plan if approved. As of March 6, 2014, the Company had repurchased 25,999,801 shares of Common Stock under this non-discretionary repurchase plan. In addition, the Board of Directors has authorized a discretionary stock repurchase plan which allows for the repurchase of such shares as may be necessary to reduce the total shares outstanding to 190,000,000. It is the intentPlan.

Summary of the Board of Directors, that management make use of this discretionary authority to eliminate any further growth in the number of issued and outstanding shares as a result of option exercises and to repurchase additional shares. As of March 6, 2014, the Company had repurchased 35,419,634 shares of Common2016 Stock under this discretionary repurchase plan.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF THE 2014 STOCK OPTION PLAN.
SUMMARY OF THE 2014 STOCK OPTION PLAN
Option Plan

The following summary of the Company’s 2014 Stock2016 Option Plan (the “2014 Option Plan”) is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full textapplicable provisions of the 2014 Stock Option Plan, a copy ofplan document which is includedattached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

Over 15,000 individuals would be eligible to receive options under the 2016 Option Plan.

The 20142016 Option Plan provides for the grant of two types of options: (1) Incentive Stock Options, which are options that meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, and (2) Non-Qualified Stock Options. Shareholder approval will make available a total of 2,750,0003,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued Common Stock for purchase upon exercise of options granted under the 20142016 Option Plan. The term of the 20142016 Option Plan is one year. No options may be granted under the 20142016 Option Plan after midnight April 30, 2015.2017. In addition, no options may be granted under the 20142016 Option Plan if there are no shares available for issuance. No reload options may be granted under the 20142016 Option Plan.


39



Incentive Stock Options may be granted to employees of the Company or a related corporation. Non-Qualified Stock Options may be granted to employees of the Company, a related corporation, or affiliated companies. In any fiscal year, no employee may receive options to purchase more than 100,000150,000 shares of Common Stock and no option may be granted with an exercise price less than the fair market value measured on the date of the grant.

The 20142016 Option Plan will be administered by a committeethe Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors consisting exclusively of members that are both “non-employee directors”Directors” and “outside directors”Directors” as those terms are defined in the 20142016 Option Plan. The Committee will have authority to construe, amend or terminate the 20142016 Option Plan. The Committee is prohibited from repricing options to account for market price declines under the 20142016 Option Plan. A written agreement will evidence each option and determine whether the option is an Incentive Stock Option or Non-Qualified Stock Option. The form of 20142016 Stock Option Agreement can be viewed in its entirety in Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.

48    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 3: APPROVE 2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Options will expire no later than ten10 years from the date of grant; provided that no Incentive Stock Option granted to a greater-than-ten-percentgreater-than-10% shareholder will expire later than five5 years from the date of grant. Vested options generally will terminate upon the first to occur of: (1) expiration of the option; (2) three months following the optionee’s termination of employment, other than as a result of death or disability; or (3) six months following the optionee’s death or cessation of employment by reason of disability.

Options granted under the 20142016 Stock Option Plan will be 50% vested from three years, 75% vested from four years and fully vested five yearsvest as follows: 33% 1 year from the date of grant.grant date; 66% after 2 years; and the remainder after 3 years. The Committee may accelerate vesting. Upon a change in control, all options outstanding at the date thereof will become fully vested and exercisable. The purchase price of option shares must be paid by wire transfer, except to the extent another method is permitted by the Committee.

The 20142016 Option Plan will only be effective upon approval by the shareholders. No options have been granted under the 20142016 Option Plan. Because benefits under the 2016 Option Plan will depend on the Committee’s actions and no determination has been made asthe fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock at various future dates, it is not possible to whodetermine the benefits that will receive an option grantbe received by executive officers and other employees if the 20142016 Option Plan is approved by the shareholders.

The Plan is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and is not qualified under Code Section 401(a).

Because benefits under the 2014 Option Plan will depend on the Committee’s actions and the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock at various future dates, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received by executive officers and other employees if the 2014 Option Plan is approved by shareholders.

Information concerning awards under the 20132015 Option Plan is available in thethis Proxy Statement in the following tables and the narrative accompanying them:Compensation Discussion and Analysis;Analysis; Summary Compensation Table for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013,2015, Grants of Plan Based Awards Table, Option Exercises and Year-End Option Value Tables.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE 2014 OPTION PLAN

Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the 2016 Option Plan

The following is a brief description of the Federal income tax consequences addressestreatment that will generally apply to options granted under the 2016 Option Plan based on current Federal income tax consequences for both “Incentive Stock Options” as defined in Section 422 of the Coderules.

Incentive stock options are options which under certain circumstances and “Non-Qualified Options” and is intended merely to provide basic information with respect to the tax treatment applicable to the 2014 Option Plan. Although the Company believes the following statements are correct, the statements are based upon legislative, administrative, and judicial authority that is subject to revision and differing interpretations. Each participant incertain tax restrictions, have special tax benefits for employees under the Company’s 2014 Option Plan should consult his or her ownCode. Nonqualified stock options are options which do not receive such special tax advisor concerningtreatment.

When the tax consequences of grant, exercise, or surrender ofCommittee grants an incentive stock option and when the sale or other disposition of any stock acquired pursuant to the exercise ofoptionee exercises an option. Individual financial and Federal tax situations may vary, and state and local tax considerations may be significant.

Non-Qualified Stock Options
Any option that does not meet with all the requirements of Section 422 of the Code is commonly referred to as a non-qualified stock option. The grant of a non-qualifiedincentive stock option does not have income tax consequences for either the Company or the recipient. Upon exercise of the option,and acquires Common Stock, the optionee must recognize ordinaryrealizes no taxable income in an amount equal toincome. However, the difference between the fair market value of the shares acquired upon exercise and the amount paid to exercise the option. The optionee exercising a non-qualified stock option will have aprice (the spread) is an item of tax liabilitypreference subject to withholding even though the shares giving rise to the liability may not have been sold and converted to cash on the date of exercise.

40



The optionee receives a tax basis in the shares equal to the amount of income reported plus the amount of cash or basis of other property exchanged in the exercise.
The Company should be entitled to an income tax deduction at time of exercise, and in the same amount, as the optionee recognizes ordinary taxable income.
Stock acquired through the exercise of a non-qualified stock option is a capital asset in the hands of the optionee. When the stock is sold, the holder may recognize a capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the sale and the adjusted basis of the stock sold. The sale of stock has no tax impact on the Company.
Incentive Stock Options
An incentive stock option must meet all the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. Optionees do not recognize regular taxable income upon the grant or upon the exercise of an incentive stock option. However, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of such shares as of the date of exercise will be an adjustment for the purpose of calculating alternative minimum taxable income. The alternative minimum tax is payable only to the extent that it exceeds the regular income tax. If the alternative minimum tax applies, it may be possible to recover some, if not all,application of the alternative minimum tax paid through a credit carried forward to a tax year where regular tax liability exceedstax.

If the alternative minimum tax.

So long asoptionee disposes of the stock acquired through an incentive stock option is held for at leastbefore two years from grant or one year from the date of exercise and two years from the date of the grant, the sale of the shares is not considered to be aincentive stock option (a disqualifying disposition. Anydisposition), any gain or loss, measured by the difference between the amount realized upon sale and the adjusted basis will be treateddeemed compensation and taxed as proceeds from the sale of a long-term capital asset. In general, the adjusted basis will be the cash or adjusted basis of other property exchanged to exercise the option. The Company will not receive an income tax deduction for qualifying dispositions.
Shares which are sold in a disqualifying disposition (anything that is not a qualifying disposition) in situations other than in an insolvency proceeding require the seller to recognize ordinary income atto the timeextent of the disposition in an amount equal to the lesser of (1)(i) the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the sharesstock at the time the option was exercised or (2) the difference betweenexercise and the exercise price (the spread) or (ii) the difference, if any, between the sale price and the exercise price. If a disqualifying disposition occurs, the Company can claim a deduction equal to the amount treated as compensation. If one- and two-year holding periods are satisfied, any gain or loss realized upon disposition ofwhen the shares and the seller is required to recognize long-term or short-termare sold will be treated as a capital gain or loss, (depending on whetherand the seller has heldCompany will receive no corresponding tax deduction.

When the shares for more than 12 months or for 12 months or less) in an amount equalCommittee grants a nonqualified stock option, the optionee realizes no taxable income and the Company can claim no deduction. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the optionee realizes ordinary income to the difference between the sale priceextent of the sharesspread, and the fair market value of the shares on the date the seller exercised the option. The Company receives an incomecan claim a tax deduction onfor the amount recognized as ordinary income.

same amount.

49    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 3: APPROVE 2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Special Rules. Rules:Special rules may apply in the case of individuals subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. In particular, unless a special election is made pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code, shares of Company Common Stock received pursuant to the exercise of an option may be treated as restricted as to transferability and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture for a period of up to six months after the date of grant. Accordingly, the amount of any ordinary income recognized, and the amount of the Company’s tax deduction, may be determined as of the end of such period.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation Under Code Section 162(m):Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits to $1,000,000 the amount that a publicly-held corporation is allowed each year to deduct for the compensation paid to the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and the Company’s three other most highly paid Executive OfficersNEO other than the Principal Financial Officer. However, “qualified performance-based compensation” is not subject to the $1,000,000 deduction limit.

The 20142016 Option Plan has been designed to permit grants of options issued under the plan to qualify under the performance-based compensation rules so that income attributable to the exercise of a non-qualified stock option may be exempt from the $1,000,000 deduction limit. The 20142016 Option Plan’s provisions are consistent in form with the performance-based compensation rules, so that if the committeeCommittee that grants options consists exclusively of members of the Board of Directors of the Company who qualify as “outside directors,Directors,” and the exercise price is not less than the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock to which such grants relate, the compensation income arising on exercise of


41



those options should qualify as performance-based compensation which is deductible even if that income would be in excess of the otherwise applicable limits on deductible compensation income under Code Section 162(m).
PROPOSAL 4—APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE
2002 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
At the 2014

50    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is dedicated to overseeing all accounting and financial reporting processes, including underlying internal controls, audits, and the shareholderstransparency of the Company will be asked to approve an amendment todisclosures in the Company’s 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2002 Plan”), which, if approved, will increase by 3,000,000 the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stockfinancial reports. The Audit Committee Charter is available for purchase under the 2002 Plan. The Board of Directors believes that the 2002 Plan has contributed to strengthening the incentive of participating employees to acquire a greater propriety interest in the Company. An aggregate of 8,139,481 shares of Common Stock have been issued under the Company’s 2002 Plan, and 1,165,971 shares remained available for issuance under the 2002 Plan as of March 6, 2014. The Company believes the remaining available shares will be adequate to cover shares issued for the offering period ending July 31, 2014 but no future offering periods. If Proposal 4 is not approved, the Company will be unable to continue offering this important benefit. If Proposal 4 is approved, 4,165,971 shares of Common Stock will be made available for issuance pursuant to the 2002 Plan. A summary to the 2002 Plan is described under the caption “Summary of the 2002 Plan” in this Proxy Statement and can be viewed in its entirety in Appendix C of this Proxy Statement.

The proposed increase in the number of shares made available for issuance under the 2002 Plan will simply enable the Company to continue the 2002 Plan in future years and is not required or intended to supply or “cover” outstanding awards to 2002 Plan participants. As such, no “New Plan Benefits” have been granted to date and future awards under the 2002 Plan are not yet determinable.
The affirmative vote ofon our website at least a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the 2014 Annual Meeting is required for approval of the amendment to the 2002 Plan.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 4—APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 PLAN
SUMMARY OF THE 2002 PLAN
The following summary of the Company’s 2002 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2002 Plan, a copy of which is included as Appendix C to this Proxy Statement.
The 2002 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee will have authority to interpret the 2002 Plan, construe its terms, adopt rules and regulations, prescribe forms, and make all determinations under the 2002 Plan.
Effectively, any full-time employee of the Company, its Subsidiaries or any Consolidated Affiliate who have been with the Company for sixty (60) days prior to the beginning of the plan year will be eligible to participate in the 2002 Plan. Full-time employees are employees whose customary employment with the Company, any designated Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate is more than 20 hours per week and more than five months per year. Management believes that approximately 14,000 employees would currently be eligible to participate.
An eligible employee may enroll for an Offering Period by filing an enrollment form with the Company prior to the first day of the plan year. After initial enrollment in the 2002 Plan, the employee will be automatically re-enrolled in the 2002 Plan for subsequent Offering Periods, unless he or she files a notice of withdrawal before a new Offering Period begins, terminates employment, or otherwise becomes ineligible to participate.
Upon enrollment in the 2002 Plan, the employee must elect the rate at which he or she will make payroll contributions for the purchase of Company stock. Elections can be expressed as a percentage of base pay not to exceed 10%, although an employee’s contributions will be adjusted downward to the extent necessary to ensure that he or she will not purchase Company stock having a fair market value, as of the beginning of the Offering Period, in excess of $25,000 in any single calendar year. All employee contributions will be made by means of direct payroll deduction. The contribution rate elected by a participant will continue in effect unless the individual elects to withdraw from participation

42



for the plan year. An individual who withdraws will receive a refund of contributions made to date and must re-enroll in order to participate in any subsequent plan year.
An employee’s contributions will be credited to an account maintained on behalf of such employee. The 2002 Plan provides that the “Offering Period” means the approximate one-year period commencing on the first trading day after August 1st and terminating on the last trading day in the following July. The next Offering Period under the amended 2002 Plan will commence August 1, 2014. The Compensation Committee may change the beginning date, ending date, and duration of Offering Periods on a prospective basis, provided that Offering Periods will, in all cases, comply with applicable limitations under Section 423 of the Code.
As described above, the Company will issue shares directly to the custodian for employees’ accounts at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of Company stock at the beginning of the Offering Period or 85% of the fair market value of Company stock at the end of the Offering Period. Shares purchased under the 2002 Plan will be credited to the accounts maintained by the custodian for each participant. No interest will be credited on payroll contributions pending investment in Company stock. Dividends paid on Company stock actually credited to participants’ accounts will be automatically reinvested in additional shares by the custodian through purchases in the market (no discounts will apply to such dividend reinvestment purchases)www.investor.expeditors.com.
Participants will have the exclusive right to vote or direct the voting of shares credited to their accounts, and will be permitted to withdraw, transfer, or sell their shares without restriction. Participants’ rights under the 2002 Plan are nontransferable except pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution. A participant may terminate enrollment in the 2002 Plan at any time. All funds accumulated in a participant’s cash account for an Offering Period shall be refunded to the participant as soon as practicable following such participant’s election to discontinue payroll deductions to the 2002 Plan. A participant will be deemed to have elected to discontinue payroll deductions and withdraw from the 2002 Plan upon such participant’s death or upon termination of employment by the Company, its subsidiaries or any consolidated affiliate. The custodian will continue to hold Company Stock for the account of such a participant until the participant sells or withdraws the Company Stock, but in no event for more than one year after the participant ceases to be employed. No refunds from a participant’s cash account are permitted except upon termination of enrollment.
In the event of a change in control of the Company, the Committee administering the 2002 Plan must set a new date to exercise the option. The new exercise date must be at least 10 days prior to the date that will constitute the change in control as defined in the 2002 Plan.
The Company will pay costs and expenses incurred in the administration of the 2002 Plan and maintenance of accounts, and will pay brokerage fees and commissions for purchases. The Company will not pay brokerage fees and expenses relating to sales of stock acquired under the 2002 Plan by participants, and participants may be charged reasonable fees by the custodian for withdrawals of share certificates and other specified services. The custodian will be responsible for furnishing account statements to participants.
The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the 2002 Plan without further shareholder approval, except that shareholder approval must be obtained within one year after the effectiveness of such action if required by law or regulation or under the rules of any automated quotation system or securities exchange on which the Company’s Common Stock is then quoted or listed, or if such shareholder approval is necessary in order for the 2002 Plan to continue to meet the requirements of Section 423 of the Code. Shareholder approval will not necessarily be required for amendments that might increase the cost of the 2002 Plan or broaden eligibility. The 2002 Plan will continue until terminated by action of the Board. Shareholder approval is specifically required for any changes in the shares reserved for issuance or in the purchase price of shares to be issued under the 2002 Plan.
The 2002 Plan is not intended to be a qualified pension, profit-sharing or stock bonus plan under Code Section 401(a), nor is it subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”).

43



FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE 2002 PLAN
For employees of the Company, its subsidiaries and any consolidated affiliates, rights to purchase shares under the 2002 Plan are intended to constitute options issued pursuant to an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code. The following Federal income tax consequences would generally result under the 2002 Plan for employees of the Company, its subsidiaries and any consolidated affiliates:
(1)    No taxable income results to the participant upon the grant of options to purchase shares of Company stock or upon the automatic purchase of shares for his or her account under the 2002 Plan. Purchases are made using after tax salary deferrals from the participant’s account;
(2)    If the participant disposes of shares within two years after the first day of an offering period from which he or she purchased the shares or within one year after the purchase date from which he or she purchased the shares, at that time of sale the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares (essentially, the ordinary income is the difference in what the shares were worth on the day they were purchased and what the participant paid for the shares). The participant will be considered to have disposed of a share if the participant sells, exchanges, makes a gift or transfers (except by death) legal title to the share;
(3)    If the participant:

Audit CommitteeAll members are independent under Exchange Act and NASDAQ rules.
a.Committee Members:disposes of shares more than two years after the first day of an offering period with respect to which he or she purchased the shares and more than one year after the purchase date, orKey Responsibilities:
b.

Richard McCune, Chair

Dan Kourkoumelis

Michael Malone

The Board has determined that Mr. McCune qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under applicable SEC rules.

dies at any time while holding shares acquired under

•    Maintain oversight of financial accounting and reporting and underlying internal controls

•    Assist the 2002 Plan,Board in discharging its fiduciary responsibilities and the adequacy of disclosures to shareholders and to the public

•    Maintain oversight responsibility for the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm

•    Assure the independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm

•    Meet with the Company’s internal audit staff and members of the independent registered public accounting firm to review auditing scopes and findings

•    Facilitate open communication among Directors, the Company’s independent accountants, internal auditors and corporate management

•    Oversee enterprise risks assigned to Committee by the Board

then at

2015 Committee Highlights

The Audit Committee met 4 times in 2015. The following are some highlights and on-going projects from the time the participant disposesCommittee’s work in 2015:

Continued oversight of the shares he or she will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the lesser of:
the fair market value of the shares on the first day of the offering period over the amount of the participant’s payroll deductions used to purchase the shares (the discount in the actual price used), or
the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of disposition or death over the amount of the participant’s payroll deductions used to purchase the shares (the amount of gain realized on the sale of shares);
(4)    In addition to the tax consequences above in any scenario, the participant will recognize a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, as the case may be, in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized upon any sale of Company Common Stockdevelopment and the participant’s basis in the Common Stock (i.e., the purchase price plus the amount, if any, taxed to the participant as ordinary income, as described in (2) and (3) above).
(5)    If the holding periods described in (3) above are satisfied, the Company will not receive any deduction for Federal income tax purposes with respect to any discount in the sale price of shares purchased under the 2002 Plan. If either of the holding periods is not satisfied, the Company generally should be entitled to a tax deduction in an amount equal to the amount taxed to the participating U.S. taxpayers as ordinary income.
(6)    Dividends, if any, on shares purchased pursuant to the 2002 Plan will be taxable as dividends when paid, in which case the dividends are taxed as ordinary income.

44



PROPOSAL 5—APPROVAL OF THE 2014 DIRECTORS' RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be asked to approve the Company’s 2014 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (the "2014 Directors' Plan"), which, if approved, will make available 250,000 sharesplanned implementation of the Company’s authorized but unissued Common Stock for grants to non-management directors ("Independent Directors"). Based on the current number of Independent Directorsnew accounting system.
Monitored management’s implementation of COSO’sInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013).
Enhanced enterprise risk management protocols and history of shares issued under the 2008 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan, itamended charters.

Management is expected that 250,000 shares will be adequateresponsible for the five-year term ofCompany’s internal controls and the 2014 Directors' Restricted Stock Plan.financial reporting process. The 2014 Directors’ Plan provides that on May 20, 2014, and annually thereafter, each Independent Director will be granted the number of shares with a fair market value equal to $200,000 on the date of grant and that such shares will vest immediately on grant date. A summary of the 2014 Directors’ PlanCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm is described under the caption “Summary of the 2014 Directors' Plan” in this Proxy Statement and can be viewed in its entirety in Appendix D of this Proxy Statement. Independent Directors will no longer be granted restricted shares pursuant to the 2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan as the plan terminated on June 1, 2013.

Shareholder approval of the 2014 Directors’ Plan will enable the Company to continue to provide directors with compensation that will closely align the interests of these directors with the interests of shareholders. As of March 6, 2014, seven Independent Directors are expected to be eligible to receiveresponsible for performing an award under the 2014 Directors’ Plan.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 5—APPROVAL OF THE 2014 DIRECTORS’ RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN.
SUMMARY OF THE 2014 DIRECTORS' PLAN
The following summaryindependent audit of the Company’s 2014 Directors’ Plan is qualifiedconsolidated financial statements, and internal control over financial reporting, in its entirety by reference toaccordance with the full textstandards of the 2014 Directors’ Plan, a copy of which is included as Appendix D to this Proxy Statement.
The 2014 Directors’ Plan provides that on May 20, 2014, and annually thereafter, the Compensation Committee will grant the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a fair market value equal to $200,000 on the date of grant to each eligible director under the 2014 Directors’ Plan. If sufficient shares are not available, then each eligible director will be granted the number of shares equal to the number of remaining shares available for awards divided by the number of eligible directors. Shareholder approval will make available a total of 250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for awards under the 2014 Directors’ Plan.
Any member of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board of Directors who has not been otherwise employed by the Company or one of its affiliates during the six months prior to and including the date of any restricted stock award under the 2014 Directors’ Plan is eligible to receive such award. As of March 6, 2014, seven directors are expected to be eligible to receive an award under the 2014 Directors’ Plan.
The 2014 Directors’ Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors retains the powers and duties with regard to administration of the 2014 Directors’ Plan, notwithstanding any delegation to the Committee. The Compensation Committee will have authority to construe, amend or terminate the 2014 Directors’ Plan, provided that no amendment or termination will, without the written consent of a director, adversely affect the director’s rights under outstanding restricted stock awards. Shareholder approval must be obtained for any amendment: (1) that would increase the shares available under the 2014 Directors’ Plan; (2) that would change the formula for restricted stock awards; (3) that would permit the issuance of restricted stock awards other than as permitted under the 2014 Directors’ Plan; or (4) for which shareholder approval is required under applicable law or the rules of any national securities exchange or automated quotation system on which are listed or quoted any of the Company’s equity securities.
The Compensation Committee may grant awards under the 2014 Directors’ Plan with or without a vesting schedule. The Compensation Committee expects the 2014 annual grant under the 2014 Directors’ Plan to be granted without a vesting schedule, so that such awards shall be fully (100%(United States) (“PCAOB”) vested on the date of grant. In 2014 and for all future awards under the plan not subject to a vesting schedule on the date of grant, the award will be evidenced either by book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates.

45



The following rules shall apply in future years if any awards made under the plan are subjected to a vesting schedule on the date of grant. Upon a change in control, all awards outstanding at the date thereof will become fully vested. If a participant’s service as director is terminated, any unvested portion of an award will be forfeited unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise. The award will be evidenced either by book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates, which certificate or certificates will be held by the Company or the stock transfer agent or brokerage service selected by the Company until all of the award has become vested (the “Final Vesting Date”). Any cash dividends or other cash distributions paid on the restricted stock prior to the Final Vesting Date will be forfeited to the Company. Any cash dividends or other cash distributions paid on the restricted stock following the Final Vesting Date will be distributed to the Director.
Shares covered by a restricted stock award under the 2014 Directors’ Plan will be counted against the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the 2014 Directors’ Plan. If shares covered by an award are forfeited, or if an award is terminated without delivery of any shares, then the shares previously set aside for such award will be available for future awards under the 2014 Directors’ Plan.
If approved by shareholders, the 2014 Directors’ Plan will be effective as of May 7, 2014. No award will be made under the 2014 Directors’ Plan prior to this effective date. The 2014 Directors’ Plan will terminate upon the earlier of: (1) June 1, 2019; (2) the date on which no shares are available for issuance under the 2014 Directors’ Plan; or (3) the date of discontinuation or termination of the 2014 Directors’ Plan by the Committee or the Board of Directors. No restricted stock award will be granted under the 2014 Directors’ Plan after June 1, 2019 or any earlier date of discontinuation or termination of the 2014 Directors’ Plan by the Committee or the Board of Directors.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE 2014 DIRECTORS' PLAN
The following description of Federal income tax consequences addresses the tax consequences for restricted stock awards and is intended merely to provide basic information with respect to the tax treatment applicable under the Company’s 2014 Directors’ Plan. Although the Company believes the following statements are correct, the statements are based upon legislative, administrative, and judicial authority that is subject to revision and differing interpretations. Each participant in the Company’s 2014 Directors’ Plan should consult his or her own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of grant, vesting, sale or other disposition of any stock acquired pursuant to an award under the plan.
For awards made in 2014, and all other awards granted under the 2014 Directors’ Plan without a vesting schedule, the Director shall recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at the time of the receipt of the award, less any amount paid for the shares. The following tax consequences shall apply in future years, if awards are made subject to a vesting schedule. A Director will not recognize any income at the time of receipt of a restricted stock award unless he or she elects under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, within 30 days of receipt, to recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at the time of receipt of the award, less any amount paid for the shares. If the election is made, the Director will not be allowed a deduction with respect to any shares that fail to vest and are forfeited. If the election is not made, then on the date that the restrictions to which the restricted stock are subject are removed (i.e. the shares vest), the Director generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the shares vest less any amount paid for the shares. Whether or not an award is made subject to a vesting schedule,at the time the Director recognizes ordinary income, the Company generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount.
Generally, upon the sale or other disposition of restricted stock with respect to which the Director has recognized ordinary income (i.e., the award was granted without a vesting schedule, a Section 83(b) election was previously made or the restrictions were previously removed), the Director will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or other disposition and the holder’s basis in the shares. The Director’s basis will generally equal the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (if the award was not granted subject to a vesting schedule), at the time the restrictions were removed or, in the case of a Section 83(b) election, the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.

46



ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ALL SHARE-BASED PLANS DESCRIBED ABOVE
The applicable accounting treatment for options granted under the 2014 Option Plan, the purchase rights granted under the 2002 Plan and the restricted shares granted under the 2014 Directors' Plan is set forth in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC Topic 718). Under ASC Topic 718, the Company recognizes stock compensation expense based on an estimate of the grant date fair value of awards granted to employees and directors under the plans. This expense, adjusted for expected forfeitures, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the stock awards' vesting periods, if any.
PROPOSAL 6—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS
THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014
issuing reports thereon.

The Audit Committee has appointedreviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP to be(“KPMG”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015, the year ending December 31, 2014matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended, as adopted by the PCAOB. In addition, the Audit Committee has received from KPMG the written disclosures and the Board is asking shareholdersletter required by the PCAOB regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with KPMG the auditor’s independence from the Company and its management.

Based upon the review and discussions referred to ratify that selection. Theabove, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors has determined that itthe Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

Audit Committee:

Richard McCune, Chair

Dan Kourkoumelis

Michael Malone

51    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 4:

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

LOGO

The Board

of Directors

unanimously

recommends a vote

FORthe ratification

of KPMG LLP as

the Company’s

Independent

Registered Public

Accounting Firm


The Audit Committee is desirable to request ratificationdirectly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of its appointment at the Annual Meeting. IfCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is recommending the shareholders do not ratifyapproval of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent accountants for the appointment of independent registered public accountants will be reconsidered byCompany to audit the consolidated financial statements for 2016. If shareholders do not approve, the Audit Committee. Representatives of Committee will reconsider the appointment.

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

KPMG LLP are expected to be present atprovided the Annual Meetingfollowing audit and have the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire,other services during 2015 and to respond to appropriate questions.

Information relating to the aggregate KPMG LLP fees for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 can be found under the heading Relationship With Independent Public Accountants below.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 6—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP
AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014.
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Company has selected KPMG LLP to continue as its principal independent registered public accounting firm for the current year. Set forth below is information relating to the aggregate KPMG LLP fees for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, including affiliated member firms of the KPMG International network.
Description of Professional Service 2013 2012
Audit Fees(1) $2,527,000
 $2,447,000
Audit Related Fees(2) $29,000
 $28,000
Tax Fees(3) $129,000
 $107,000
All Other Fees $
 $
___________________ 
(1)Includes fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, a registration statement, and statutory audits required internationally.
(2)Includes the fees for attestations reports for international subsidiaries.
(3)Includes the fees for tax advice and compliance. No fees were paid to KPMG LLP in either year for tax planning.
2014:

    2015   2014        

Audit Fees

  $2,718,000    $2,625,000    

 

Includes fees associated with the annual integrated audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, statutory audits of foreign subsidiaries, and a registration statement.

 

  

Audit-Related Fees

   26,000     30,000    

 

Includes fees for attestation reports for international subsidiaries.

 

  

Tax Fees

   152,000     134,000    

 

Includes fees for tax advice and compliance. No fees were paid to KPMG in either year for tax planning.

 

  

 

All Other Fees

 

   -     -       

 

Total Fees

 

  $    2,896,000    $    2,789,000       

The Audit Committee has established a policy which prohibits the Company from retaining its principal independent registered public accounting firm for any engagements other than those that could be described above as audit, audit related or other services pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In all cases, the Audit Committee has approvedapproves the services to be provided in advance to determine whether they would be compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

The Audit Committee also reviews and has determined thatapproves an annual budget for specific categories of non-audit services (that are detailed as to the particular services) which KPMG is to be permitted to provide (those categories do not include any of the prohibited services in the auditor independence provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). This review includes an evaluation of the possible impact of the provision of such services by KPMG on the firm’s independence in performing its audit and audit-related services.

The Audit Committee and the Company’s Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Company has been advised by KPMG that it will have a representative present at the Annual Meeting who will be available to respond to appropriate questions. The representative will also have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.

52    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 5:

VOTE TO APPROVE A PROXY ACCESS AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS

At the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting, the Company asked its shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution, backed by the Board’s unanimous recommendation in favor of a well-defined proxy access mechanism:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve of the Board of Directors taking the actions necessary and appropriate to implement, and submit for shareholder approval, a proxy access framework for enabling an individual eligible shareholder (or group of up to 20 eligible shareholders) holding a “net long” position of at least 3% of Expeditors’ outstanding shares continuously for at least three years, to use the Company’s proxy statement to nominate director candidates constituting up to 20% of the Board of Directors, subject to and in accordance with such specific terms, conditions, qualifications and protections as the Board of Directors may in its business judgment determine to be in the best interests of Expeditors and the shareholders.” (collectively, the “Framework”)

The Company’s proposal passed, and, since the 2015 Annual Meeting, the Company has continued to review governance developments, market practices and trends and shareholder perspectives regarding proxy access and engaged with shareholders representing nearly 60% of the Company’s outstanding shares regarding how to best implement the Framework and appropriate terms, restrictions and conditions for meaningfully enhancing the rights of long-term shareholders while limiting the potential abuse, costs and distractions associated with unnecessarily contested director elections and misuse of the proxy access process. From this, and taking into account diverse perspectives from the Company’s shareholders, the Company has endeavored to implement the Framework in a straightforward and equitable manner, taking into account the best interests of Expeditors and the shareholders.

To that end, the Company is asking its shareholders to approve an Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws that would implement proxy access on the terms approved by shareholders at the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting. The Company is putting the proposed proxy access bylaw provisions to a shareholder vote in order to follow-through on its prior commitment to do so and to provide the Board with an additional means for obtaining shareholder feedback and confirming shareholder support of the proposed terms beyond the engagement conducted by the Company to date with respect to particular terms and conditions.

Set forth below is a high-level summary of certain key terms and conditions of the Company’s proposed proxy access bylaw, which summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the full text of the Amendment, which is set forth in Appendix C.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR this Proposal. The Board will treat this Proposal as having passed, and will proceed to amend the Company’s Bylaws to implement proxy access, if the votes cast by voters physically present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy in favor of this Proposal exceed the votes cast against this Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in favor of or against this Proposal and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the Proposal.

LOGO

The Board

of Directors

recommends

a voteFOR

this proposal.

Major elements of this bylaw amendment:

•  

Implements Proxy Access Framework approved by shareholders at 2015 Annual Meeting,

•  

Board considered governance developments, market practices and trends, and shareholder perspectives,

•  

Company met with shareholders representing nearly 60% of outstanding shares, and

•  

Meaningfully enhances shareholder rights, while limiting potential abuse.


53    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 5: VOTE TO APPROVE A PROXY ACCESS AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS

Ownership Threshold, Holding Period & Approach to Grouping

Eligible shareholders who have continuously maintained qualifying ownership of at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding shares for at least the previous three years would generally be permitted to use the Company’s proxy statement to nominate, at the Company’s annual meetings of shareholders, eligible director candidates constituting up to 20% of the Board, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Company’s Bylaws.

Shareholders would be permitted to aggregate their continuously held shares in order to meet the 3% threshold, and up to 20 shareholders would be permitted to group their shares accordingly in order to meet the ownership threshold requirement. In order to facilitate the workability and usability of proxy access, members of fund families would be counted as one shareholder for purposes of the 20-person aggregation limit, rather than be treated as separate shareholders.

Calculation of Qualifying Ownership

In order to increase the likelihood that the interests of shareholders seeking to include director nominees in the Company’s proxy materials are aligned with those of other shareholders and that a “net long” position is maintained:

Nominating shareholders would be considered to own only the shares for which the shareholder possesses both (i) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (ii) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares;

Shares would not count if they have been sold, including in transactions that have not been settled or closed;

Shares would not count if they have been borrowed or purchased pursuant to an agreement to resell; and

Shares would not count if they are subject to derivatives or similar arrangements, whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the notional amount or value of shares of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, which agreement or instrument has, or is intended to have, the purpose or effect of reducing voting rights or hedging, offsetting or altering gain or loss realized or realizable from maintaining the full economic ownership of such shares.

With respect to recallable loaned shares, a shareholder will be deemed for this purpose to still have voting rights over otherwise “owned” shares of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock that the shareholder has loaned in the ordinary course of business, so long as the shareholder has the right to recall such loaned shares upon giving no more than five days’ notice. Shareholders will be required to recall such shares as of the record date of the applicable annual meeting in order to vote any such shares at the meeting.

Maximum Number of Shareholder Nominated Candidates Available Under Proxy Access (Nominee Limit)

The maximum number of shareholder-nominated candidates nominated by all eligible shareholders that the Company would be required to include in its proxy materials would be 20% of the number of directors serving on the Board. If the 20% calculation does not result in a whole number, the maximum number of shareholder-nominated candidates would be the closest whole number below 20%. Based on the Company’s current Board size of 11 directors, the maximum number of proxy access candidates that the Company would be required to include in its proxy materials for an annual meeting is two.

The number of permitted candidates would include director nominees submitted under the proxy access procedures that later withdraw or that the Board includes in the Company’s proxy materials as Board-nominated candidates, as well as directors in office for whom proxy access was previously provided or requested. Previously elected proxy access candidates would continue to count towards the nomination cap until they have served as Board nominees for three terms. Reductions in the size of the Board would result in a re-calculation of the number of available proxy access seats.

Nominating shareholders whose director nominees are elected to the Board will not be permitted to use proxy access to nominate other director nominees for the next two succeeding annual meetings after such director nominee is elected to the Board.

54    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 5: VOTE TO APPROVE A PROXY ACCESS AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS

Procedure for Selecting Candidates in the Event the

Number of Proxy Access Nominees Exceeds the Nominee Limit

Nominating shareholders who submit more than one director nominee would be required to rank their proposed nominees by preferred order of inclusion. If the number of shareholder-nominated candidates exceeds the nominee limit, the highest ranking qualified individual from the list proposed by each nominating shareholder, beginning with the nominating shareholder with the largest qualifying stock ownership and proceeding through the list of nominating shareholders in descending order of qualifying stock ownership, will be selected for inclusion in the proxy materials until the nominee limit is reached.

Nomination Deadline for Proxy Access

Requests to include shareholder-nominated candidates in the Company’s proxy materials pursuant to the proposed proxy access mechanism must be received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date that the Company issued its proxy statement to shareholders for the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Information Required from Nominating Shareholders

Each shareholder seeking to include a director nominee in the Company’s proxy materials is required to provide certain information to the Company, including with respect to:

Proof of qualifying stock ownership;

Information relating to the shareholder that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act;

Compensation arrangements;

Updates and supplements to previously provided information; and

The information required by the advance notice provisions of the Company’s Bylaws with respect to non-proxy access shareholder nominees.

Nominating shareholders would also be required to make certain representations to and agreements with the Company, including with respect to:

Having acquired the shares in the ordinary course of business;

Lack of intent to change or influence control of the Company;

Maintaining qualifying ownership through the record date and annual meeting date;

Providing accurate and complete information and disclosures;

Complying with applicable laws and regulations;

Assumption of liability and associated indemnification of covered matters and persons;

Refraining from nominating persons for election to the Board other than the shareholder’s nominees submitted through the proxy access process and related restrictions;

Refraining from distributing to shareholders any form of proxy statement or proxy card other than the form distributed by the Company;

Providing the Company with such other reasonably requested information; and

Filing solicitations with the SEC.

55    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL NO. 5: VOTE TO APPROVE A PROXY ACCESS AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S BYLAWS

Information Required of Director Nominees Submitted Through Proxy Access

Each director nominee submitted under the proxy access mechanism is required to provide certain information to the Company and make certain written representations to and agreements with the Company, including with respect to:

Consenting to being named in the Company’s proxy statement and serving as a director, if elected;

Providing the same information required of non-proxy access shareholder nominees under the Company’s Bylaws;

Whether the director nominee meets applicable audit committee independence requirements, “non-employee director” requirements under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and “outside director” requirements under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, or has been subject to certain regulatory or legal orders;

Completing the same form of D&O questionnaire and form of representation and agreement regarding, among other matters, disclosure of third-party compensation agreements and voting commitments and compliance with fiduciary duties and the Company’s policies as required of other shareholder nominees under the Company’s Bylaws; and

Providing such additional information necessary to determine if the director nominee is independent under applicable independence standards and if the nominee otherwise qualifies under the Company’s proxy access bylaws.

Inclusion of Supporting Statement

Nominating shareholders would be permitted to include in the Company’s proxy statement for the applicable annual meeting a 500-word statement in support of their director nominee(s). The Company may omit information and statements that the Company, in good faith, believes are materially false or misleading, impugn the character of any person or make charges of improper conduct (in each case without factual foundation), or would violate applicable laws or regulations.

Limitations on the Company’s Obligation to

Include Proxy Access Director Nominees in the Proxy Statement

The Company would not be required to include a director nominee in the Company’s proxy materials under the proposed proxy access mechanism (or permit their nomination pursuant to such mechanism) if:

The requirements set forth in the proxy access bylaw are not met;

The election of the director nominee would cause the Company to violate its Charter or Bylaws, stock exchange requirements or any other applicable law, rule or regulation;

The director nominee is not independent of the Company and of the nominating shareholder or is, or has been within the past three years, an officer, director or employee of the Company or of the nominating shareholder or an officer or director of a competitor (as defined in Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914);

The director nominee or the nominating shareholder breaches applicable obligations, agreements or representations under the proxy access provisions or does not maintain eligibility; or

The Company has received nominations pursuant to the non-proxy access advance notice provisions of its Bylaws.

The Bylaws do not include a re-nomination restriction on proxy access director nominees tied to a nominee failing to receive a minimum level of votes in favor of such nominee’s election to the board.

Other terms and conditions as set forth in the Company’s Bylaws would also apply.

56    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL NO. 6: Recovery of Unearned Management Bonuses

William Steiner, acting through John Chevedden and/or his designee, has given formal notice that he will introduce the following resolution and supporting statement at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

RESOLVED, that shareholders request the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors to adopt an incentive pay recoupment policy to provide that the Committee will (a) review, and determine whether to seek recoupment of incentive compensation paid, granted or awarded to a senior executive if, in the Committee’s judgment, (i) there has been misconduct resulting in a violation of law or company policy, that causes significant financial or reputational harm to the company and (ii) the senior executive either committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor conduct or risks; and (b) disclosure to shareholders the circumstances of any recoupment, and of any Committee decision not to pursue recoupment in instances that meet criteria (i) and (ii). The Policy should mandate that the above recoupment provisions be included in all future incentive plans and award agreements and that the policy be posted on the company website.

Recoupment includes (a) recovery of compensation already paid and (b) forfeiture, recapture, reduction or cancellation of amounts awarded or granted to an executive over which the company retains control. The Policy should operate prospectively, so as not to affect any compensation paid, awarded or granted before it takes effect.

Former General Electric General Counsel Ben Heineman Jr. said that recoupment policies with business-related misconduct triggers are “a powerful mechanism for holding senior leadership accountable to the fundamental mission of the corporation: proper risk taking balanced with proper risk management and the robust fusion of high performance with high integrity.”

Please vote to protect shareholder value:

Recovery of Unearned Management Bonuses-Proposal 6

57    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

LOGO

The Board

of Directors

recommends

a voteAGAINST

this proposal.

Over 70% of shareholders voted AGAINST an identical shareholder proposal last year.

The Board believes that it already achieves this through:

•  

our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which by its terms has contained a recoupment policy since its inception, and

•  

our current Sarbanes-Oxley Act “clawback policy” was expanded to apply to all of our executive officers and certain senior managers.


Company Statement in Opposition

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you voteAGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

An identical shareholder-sponsored proposal was put forth for vote in the 2015 proxy and was rejected by shareholders with over 70% voting against the proposal.

The Board of Directors agrees with the principle that incentive compensation paid, granted or awarded to senior executives should be subject to recoupment in the event a senior executive causes significant financial or reputational harm to the Company. The Board of Directors believes that it already achieves this through a combination of:

our non-equity 2008 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which by its terms has contained a recoupment policy since its inception,

our current Sarbanes-Oxley Act “clawback policy,” was amended to expand its application to all of our executive officers and certain senior managers, not just “senior executives” encompassed in the proposal, and

our Code of Business Conduct, which requires all Directors, officers and employees to maintain the highest standards of legal and ethical business conduct.

The Board of Directors believes the proposal should be rejected for the following reasons:

the proposal is already substantially implemented,

implementing the proposal would create inconsistent and ambiguous standards for incentive compensation recoupment, and

such inconsistent and ambiguous standards, as well as ambiguous language within the proposal, may harm our ability to attract and retain high-quality executive talent.

Substantially Implemented. We already have an incentive compensation recoupment policy implemented in our primary incentive plan, the 2008 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. The 2008 Plan contains broad language allowing the Compensation Committee to reduce or cancel amounts awarded or granted to participants based on such criteria as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion. This authority would permit the Compensation Committee to reduce or cancel awards for any of these services is compatiblethe reasons contained in the proposal. The 2008 Plan also automatically recoups compensation by ensuring that any operating losses are recovered from future income before payment of performance awards. Our Sarbanes-Oxley Act “clawback policy,” as amended also triggers the Compensation Committee to review incentive compensation paid to executives when an executive’s misconduct causes a restatement of the Company’s financial results.

58    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Impediment to Attracting and Retaining Talent. The proposal’s conflict with KPMG LLP maintaining its independence.



47
the current compensation structure would hinder our ability to attract and retain executive talent because executives would not have a clear indication what portions of their compensation are subject to recoupment. Further, the proposal’s ambiguous language would also strongly deter executive talent from working for us. Among other ambiguities, the proposal vaguely requires recoupment for any misconduct occurring generally. Executive talent may fear that isolated misconduct by another person could lead to their own compensation recoupment, creating a substantial disincentive to work for us.

Accordingly, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the Shareholders vote AGAINST Proposal No. 6—Policy Regarding Recovery of Unearned Management Bonuses.

59    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement




OTHER BUSINESS
INFORMATION

Other Business

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, management knows of no other business which will be presented for action at the meeting. If any other business requiring a vote of the shareholders should come before the meeting, the persons designated as your proxies will vote or refrain from voting in accordance with their best judgment.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of current executive officers of the Company.

  Name

Age

Position

  Jeffrey S. Musser

50

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

  Philip M. Coughlin

55

President, Global Geographies and Operations

  Daniel R. Wall

47

President, Global Products

  Eugene K. Alger

55

President, Global Services

  Bradley S. Powell

55

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  Christopher J. McClincy

41

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

  Benjamin G. Clark

47

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Jeffrey S. Musser joined the Company in February 1983 and was promoted to District Manager in October 1989. Mr. Musser was elected to Regional Vice President in September 1999, Senior Vice President-Chief Information Officer in January 2005 and to Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer in May 2009. On December 19, 2013, Mr. Musser was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer succeeding Peter J. Rose as Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2014 and was elected by the Board of Directors as a director effective March 1, 2014.

Philip M. Coughlin joined the Company in October 1985 and was promoted to District Manager in August 1986. Mr. Coughlin was elected Regional Manager in January 1991, Regional Vice President in January 1992, Senior Vice President of North America in September 1999 and to Executive Vice President-North America in March 2008. In June 2014, Mr. Coughlin was promoted to President, Global Geographies and Operations.

Daniel R. Wall joined the Company in March 1987, and was promoted to District Manager in May 1992 and Global Director-Account Management in March 2002. Mr. Wall was elected Vice President-ECMS in January 2004 and Senior Vice President-Ocean Services in September 2004. In June 2015, Mr. Wall was appointed as President, Global Products.

Eugene K. Alger joined the Company in October 1981 and was promoted to District Manager in May 1982, Mr. Alger was elected Regional Vice President in January 1992, Senior Vice President of North America in September 1999 and to Executive Vice President-North America in March 2008. In June 2014, Mr. Alger was promoted to Executive Vice President-Global Services. In August 2015, Mr. Alger was promoted to President, Global Services.

Bradley S. Powell joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer in October 2008 and was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in February 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Powell served as President and Chief Financial Officer of Eden Bioscience Corporation, a publicly-traded biotechnology company, from December 2006 to September 2008 and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 1998 to December 2006.

Christopher J. McClincy joined the Company in July 1998 and was promoted to Vice President-Information Services in April 2009. In February 2014, Mr. McClincy was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer.

60    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


OTHER INFORMATION

Benjamin G. Clark joined the Company in February 2015 as Senior Vice President and General Counsel and was appointed Corporate Secretary in May 2015. Preceding Expeditors, Mr. Clark served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Dematic Group, a global provider of intelligent intralogistics and materials handling solutions. Prior to his experience with Dematic, Mr. Clark spent four years as the Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for the publicly traded Celanese Corporation, a global technologies and specialty materials company. From 2002 to 2009 Mr. Clark worked for Honeywell International, Inc., where he held progressively responsible roles concluding as the Vice President and General Counsel, Aerospace Global Operations.

Certain Relationships & Related Transactions

The following section describes, since the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2013, (i)2015, (a) transactions in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was a party, in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which a director, a director nominee, an Executive Officer,executive officer, any immediate family member of a director, director nominee or Executive Officer,executive officer, a security holder known to own more than five percent5% of the Company’s common stockCommon Stock or any immediate family member of the security holder had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest or (ii)(b) certain business relationships that existed between the Company and directorsDirectors or director nominees, or between the Company and entities affiliated with such directorsDirectors or directorDirector nominees. The Company'sCompany’s written policy and procedures with respect to any related person transaction between the Company and any related person requiring disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, is that such transaction is consummated only if the Audit Committee approves or ratifies such transaction (or the disinterested members of the Board of Directors approve or ratify such transaction).

Jeffrey S. Musser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the son-in-law of Peter J. Rose, Chairman and retired Chief Executive Officer, was employed in 2013 as Executive Vice President—Chief Information Officer. Mr. Musser earned total compensation of $3,492,203, including a stock option grant with a fair value of $121,601.

Allen and Rex Wang are sons of James L.K.Wang,L.K. Wang, Director and former President—Asia Pacific and Director.Pacific. Allen Wang was employed as RegionalSenior Vice President—Northern ChinaNorth Asia and earned total compensation of $1,154,777,$2,453,157, including a stock option grant with a fair market value of $48,640.$446,633. Rex Wang was employed as Air Export Manager of the Company's Hong Kong officeGeneral Manager-Air Product, South Asia and earned total compensation of $224,234,$464,529, including a stock option grant with a fair market value of $11,065. Anthony Villanueva, the son$25,096. Brian and Stephen Coughlin are brothers of Robert L.Villanueva,Philip M. Coughlin, President—The Americas,Global Geographies and Operations. Brian Coughlin was employed as BranchDistrict Manager of the Company's SeattleCompany’s Chicago office and earned total compensation of $334,596,$1,131,538, including a stock option grant with a fair market value of $38,727. Brian and Stephen Coughlin are brothers of Philip M. Coughlin, Executive Vice President—North America. Brian Coughlin was employed as District Manager of the Company's Chicago office and earned total compensation of $1,144,546, including a stock option grant with a fair market value of $66,388.$50,192. Stephen Coughlin was employed as Account Manager—Project Cargo Services and earned total compensation of $140,562, including$143,058. In 2015, the Company expensed $483,461 for the previously disclosed retirement bonus of Peter J. Rose, former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and father-in-law of current President and CEO, Jeffrey S. Musser.

61    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


OTHER INFORMATION

Voting Procedures

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 8, 2016 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. On or about March 24, 2016, the Company will mail to shareholders either: (a) a stock option grant with a fair market value of $16,597. Steven Ross, the son of Rosanne Esposito, Executive Vice President—Global Customs, was employed as Customer Solutions Managercopy of the Company's Los Angeles officeProxy Statement, a form of proxy and earned totalan Annual Report, or (b) a notice of Internet availability of proxy materials, which will indicate how to access the proxy materials on the Internet.

You may instruct the proxies to vote ‘‘FOR’’ or ‘‘AGAINST’’ each proposal, or you may instruct the proxies to ‘‘ABSTAIN’’ from voting. Each share of our Common Stock outstanding on the record date will be entitled to one vote on each of the 11 director nominees and one vote on each other proposal. If the accompanying form of proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, such shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please submit your vote and proxy by telephone, by mail or by Internet in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card or voting instruction form. This will ensure a quorum at the meeting. The giving of the proxy will not affect your right to vote at the meeting if the proxy is revoked in the manner set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

Abstentions are counted for quorum purposes. If you return a signed proxy card/voting instruction form to allow your shares to be represented at the Annual Meeting, but do not indicate how your shares should be voted on one or more proposals listed above, then the proxies will vote your shares as the Board of Directors recommends on those proposals. Other than the proposals listed above, we do not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies may vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

Any shareholder executing a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time prior to the voting thereof on any matter (without, however, affecting any vote taken prior to such revocation) by delivering written notice to the Secretary of the Company, by executing and delivering to the Company another proxy dated as of a later date or by voting in person at the meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of Directors, the non-binding vote approving compensation of $145,136.

In connection withNEO, the acquisitionapproval of the assets2016 Stock Option Plan, approval of certain Asia affiliates (including Taiwan) effective January 1, 1984,an amendment to the Company agreedCompany’s Bylaws, and a shareholder proposal. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your bank or broker how to use its best efforts, so longvote in these matters, no votes will be cast on your behalf. Your bank or broker will have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as James L.K. Wang remainsthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If you are a shareholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals at the Annual Meeting.

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available to the Company’s registered holders

and employee stock purchase plan participants atwww.envisionreports.com/expd

and to the Company’s beneficial holders atwww.edocumentview.com/expd

62    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


OTHER INFORMATION

Voting Securities

The only outstanding voting securities of the Company are shares of Common Stock. As of the Record Date, there were 182,561,327 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, and each such share is employedentitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. The presence in person or by proxy of holders of record of a majority of the Companyoutstanding shares of Common Stock is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares of Common Stock underlying abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.

Under Washington law and the Company’s Bylaws, if a quorum is present, the 11 nominees for election to the Board of Directors who receive the majority of the votes cast by voters physically present at the Annual Meeting or any of its affiliates or exclusive agents, to cause one person nominatedrepresented by Mr. Wang toproxy shall be elected Directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted either in favor of or against the election of the nominees and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

With respect to the proposals for a non-binding vote approving the compensation of NEO, approval of the 2016 Stock Option Plan, the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and vote on 1 shareholder proposal, as well as approval of an amendment to the Company’s Bylaws, such proposals will be approved if the votes cast by voters physically present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast against such proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted either in favor of or against such proposals and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcomes of such proposals.

No cumulative voting rights are authorized, and dissenters’ rights are not applicable to any of the matters being voted on. Proxies and ballots will be received and tabulated by Computershare Trust Company, N.A., an independent business entity not affiliated with the Company. The Common Stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol EXPD. The last sale price for the Common Stock, as reported by NASDAQ on March 8, 2016, was $47.21 per share.

Solicitation of Proxies

The proxy accompanying this Proxy Statement is solicited by the Board of Directors.Directors of the Company. Proxies may be solicited by officers, Directors and regular supervisory and executive employees of the Company, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services. In addition, the Company has agreed that itto pay the firm of Advantage Proxy a fee of $10,000 plus reasonable expenses for proxy solicitation services. Solicitations of proxies may be made personally, or by mail, telephone, facsimile or messenger.

The Company, if requested, will make no appointmentpay persons holding shares of a managerCommon Stock in their names or in the names of nominees, but not owning such shares beneficially, such as brokerage houses, banks and other fiduciaries, for any Asia office without prior consultation with Mr. Wang so long as he remains a shareholderthe expense of the Company and is employedforwarding soliciting materials to their principals. All such costs of solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company or oneCompany.

Deadlines for Shareholder Proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting of its affiliates or exclusive agents. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Wang has been nominated for re-election to the Company’s Board of Directors.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company’s directors, certain of its officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes of ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ. Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by the Company, and on written representations by the Company’s officers and directors regarding their compliance with the filing requirements, the Company believes that all reports required from its officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were filed on a timely basis during 2013.

48



DEADLINES FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE
2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Shareholders

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, certain shareholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for the 20152017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In order to be eligible for inclusion, such proposals must be received by the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices no later than November 21, 2014.24, 2016. Such proposals also must comply with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in company-sponsored materials.

The Company’s bylawsBylaws provide a formal procedure for bringing business before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. A shareholder proposing to present a matter (other than a proposal brought pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act) before the 20152017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or to nominate a candidate for election to the Board of Directors at the2015

63    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


OTHER INFORMATION

2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must deliver notice of the proposal or nomination to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices between the close of business on January 6, 20153, 2017 through the close of business on February 5, 2015.2, 2017. In the event that the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after May 6, 2015,3, 2017, notice of the proposal or nomination must be delivered to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices not earlier than the 120th day prior to the date of the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and not later than the later of the 90th day prior to the date of the annual meetingAnnual Meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of the annual meetingAnnual Meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, the 10th day following the day on which the Company first makes a public announcement of the date of the meeting. The shareholder’s notice must include the specified information concerning the proposal or nominee as described in the Company’s bylaws.Bylaws. The Company will not consider any proposal or nomination that does not meet the Company’s bylaw requirements or Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC requirements for submitting a proposal or nomination. Pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c)(1) under the Exchange Act, the proxies designated by the Company for the 20152017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will have discretionary authority to vote with respect to any matter presented at the meeting if the Company has not received notice of the matter by the dates required under the Company’s bylaws,Bylaws, as described above, and in certain other instances specified in that rule.

If Proposal No. 5: Vote to Approve a Proxy Access Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws is approved, an eligible shareholder seeking to nominate a candidate for election to the Board of Directors at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must deliver notice of the nomination to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices between the close of business on October 25, 2016 through the close of business on November 24, 2016.

Householding

To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate materials, we are taking advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sCommission’s “householding” rules which permit us to deliver only one set of proxy materials (or one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials) to shareholders who share an address unless otherwise requested. If you share an address with another shareholder and have received only one set of materials, you may request a separate copy at no cost to you by calling Computershare at 1-866-641-4276 or by writing to Bradley S. Powell,Benjamin G. Clark, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer,Corporate Secretary, 1015 Third Avenue, 12th12th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98104. For future annual meetingsAnnual Meetings you may request separate materials, or request that we send only one set of materials to you if you are receiving multiple copies, by calling Computershare at 1-866-641-4276 or by writing to Mr. PowellClark at the address listed above.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The proxy accompanying this

64    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement is solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. Proxies may be solicited by officers, directors and regular supervisory and executive employees of the Company, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay the firm of Advantage Proxy a fee of $10,000 plus reasonable expenses for proxy solicitation services. Solicitations of proxies may be made personally, or by mail, telephone, facsimile or messenger.

The Company, if requested, will pay persons holding shares of Common Stock in their names or in the names of nominees, but not owning such shares beneficially, such as brokerage houses, banks and other fiduciaries, for the expense of forwarding soliciting materials to their principals. All such costs of solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Seattle, Washington
March 21, 2014


49



























[This page intentionally left blank.]



























[This page intentionally left blank.]





APPENDIXAppendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2014

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

This 20142016 Stock Option Plan (the 2014“2016 Option Plan”) provides for the grant of options to acquire shares of common stock,Common Stock, $.01 par value (the “Common Stock”), of EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC., a Washington corporation (the “Company”). Stock options granted under this 20142016 Option Plan that qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), are referred to in this 20142016 Option Plan as “Incentive Stock Options.” Incentive Stock Options and stock options that do not qualify under Section 422 of the Code (“Non-Qualified Stock Options”) granted under this 20142016 Option Plan are referred to as “Options.”

1.    PURPOSES.

1.PURPOSES

The purposes of this 20142016 Option Plan are to retain the services of valued key employees of the Company, its subsidiaries and such other affiliates as the Plan Administrator shall select in accordance with Section 3 below; to encourage such persons to acquire a greater proprietary interest in the Company, thereby strengthening their incentive to achieve the objectives of the shareholders of the Company; and to serve as an aid and inducement in the hiring of new employees.

2.    ADMINISTRATION.

2.ADMINISTRATION

This 20142016 Option Plan shall be administered by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) if each directorDirector is an “outside director” (as defined below). If all directorsDirectors are not outside directors, the 20142016 Option Plan shall be administered by a committee designated by the Board and composed of two (2) or more members of the Board that are “non-employee directors” and “outside directors” (as defined below), which committee (the “Committee”) may be the compensation committee or a separate committee especially created for this purpose. The term “non-employee director” shall have the meaning assigned to it under Rule 16b-3 (as amended from time to time) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or any successor rule or regulatory requirement. The term “outside director” shall have the meaning assigned under Section 162(m) of the Code (as amended from time to time) and the regulations (or any successor regulations) promulgated thereunder (“Section 162(m) of the Code”). The Committee shall have the powers and authority vested in the Board hereunder (including the power and authority to interpret any provision of this 20142016 Option Plan or of any Option). The members of any such Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Board. A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and all actions of the Committee shall be taken by a majority of the members present. Any action may be taken by a written instrument signed by all of the members of the Committee and any action so taken shall be fully effective as if it had been taken at a meeting. The Board, or any committee thereof appointed to administer the 20142016 Option Plan, is referred to herein as the “Plan Administrator.”

Subject to the provisions of this 20142016 Option Plan, and with a view to effecting its purpose, the Plan Administrator shall have sole authority, in its absolute discretion, to: (a) construe and interpret this 20142016 Option Plan; (b) define the terms used in this 20142016 Option Plan; (c) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this 20142016 Option Plan; (d) correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this 20142016 Option Plan; (e) grant Options under this 20142016 Option Plan; (f) determine the individuals to whom Options shall be granted under this 20142016 Option Plan and whether the Option is an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option; (g) determine the time or times at which Options shall be granted under this 20142016 Option Plan; (h) determine the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each Option, the exercise price of each Option, the duration of each Option and the times at which each Option shall become exercisable; (i) determine all other terms and conditions of Options; and (j) make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of this 20142016 Option Plan. All decisions, determinations and interpretations made by the Plan Administrator shall be binding and conclusive on all participants in this 20142016 Option Plan and on their legal representatives, heirs and beneficiaries.

A-1    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

The Board or the Committee may delegate to one or more executive officers of the Company the authority to grant Options under this 20142016 Option Plan to employees of the Company who, on the Date of Grant, are not subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act with respect to the Common Stock (“Non-Insiders”), and are not “covered employees”


A-1





A-2



as such term is defined for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code (“Non-Covered Employees”), and in connection therewith the authority to determine: (a) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such Option; (b) the duration of the Option; (c) the vesting schedule for determining the times at which such Option shall become exercisable; and (d) all other terms and conditions of such Options. The exercise price for any Option granted by action of an executive officer or officers pursuant to such delegation of authority shall not be less than the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the Date of Grant. Such delegation of authority shall not include the authority to accelerate the vesting, extend the period for exercise or otherwise alter the terms of outstanding Options. The term “Plan Administrator” when used in any provision of this 20142016 Option Plan other than Sections 2, 5(m), 5(n) and 12 shall be deemed to refer to the Board or the Committee, as the case may be, and an executive officer who has been authorized to grant Options pursuant thereto, insofar as such provisions may be applied to persons that are Non-Insiders and Non-Covered Employees and Options granted to such persons.
3.    ELIGIBILITY.

3.ELIGIBILITY

Incentive Stock Options may be granted to any individual who, at the time the Option is granted, is an employee of the Company or any Related Corporation (as defined below), including employees who are directorsDirectors of the Company (“Employees”). Non-Qualified Stock Options may be granted to Employees and to such other persons who are employed by affiliated companies, other than directorsDirectors who are not Employees, as the Plan Administrator shall select. Options may be granted in substitution for outstanding Options of another corporation in connection with the merger, share exchange, acquisition of property or stock or other reorganization between such other corporation and the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. Any person to whom an Option is granted under this 20142016 Option Plan is referred to as an “Optionee.”“Optionee”. Any person who is the owner of an Option is referred to as a “Holder.”

“Holder”.

As used in this 20142016 Option Plan, the term “Related Corporation” shall mean any corporation (other than the Company) that is a “Parent Corporation” of the Company or “Subsidiary Corporation” of the Company, as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and 424(f) respectively, of the Code (or any successor provisions), and the regulations thereunder (as amended from time to time).

4.    STOCK.

4.STOCK

The Plan Administrator is authorized to grant Options to acquire up to a total of 2,750,0003,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued Common Stock during the period beginning with the Effective Date as provided for in Section 7 and ending on April 30, 20152017 (“Option Grant Period”). The number of shares with respect to which Options may be granted hereunder is subject to adjustment as set forth in Subsection 5(m) hereof. In the event that any outstanding Option expires or is terminated for any reason, the shares of Common Stock allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option may again be subject to an Option to the same Optionee or to a different person eligible under Section 3 of this 20142016 Option Plan so long as the grant is made within the Option Grant Period;provided however, that any canceled Options will be counted against the maximum number of shares with respect to which Options may be granted to any particular person as set forth in Section 6 hereof.

5.    TERMS AND CONDITIONS

A-2    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF OPTIONS.

WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

5.TERMS & CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS

Each Option granted under this 20142016 Option Plan shall be evidenced by a written or online agreement approved by the Plan Administrator (the “Agreement”). Agreements may contain such provisions, not inconsistent with this 20142016 Option Plan, as the Plan Administrator in its discretion may deem advisable. All Options also shall comply with the following requirements:

(a) Number of Shares and& Type of Option.

Option

Each Agreement, in itself or by reference to a service provider’s stock option website, shall state the number of shares of Common Stock to which it pertains and whether the Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option. In the absence of action to the contrary by the Plan Administrator in connection with the grant of an Option, all Options shall be Non-Qualified Stock Options. The aggregate fair market value (determined at the Date of Grant, as defined below) of the stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by the Optionee during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000, or such other limit as may be prescribed by the Code as it


A-3





A-4



may be amended from time to time. Any portion of an Option which exceeds the annual limit shall not be void, but rather shall be a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

(b) Date of Grant.

Grant

Each Agreement, in itself or by reference to a service provider’s stock option website, shall state the date within the Option Grant Period that the Plan Administrator has deemed to be the effective date of the Option for purposes of this 20142016 Option Plan (the “Date of Grant”).

(c) Option Price.

Price

Each Agreement, in itself or by reference to a service provider’s stock option website, shall state the price per share of Common Stock at which it is exercisable. The exercise price shall be fixed by the Plan Administrator at whatever price the Plan Administrator may determine in the exercise of its sole discretion; provided that the per share exercise price for any Option granted shall not be less than the fair market value per share of the Common Stock at the Date of Grant as determined by the Plan Administrator in good faith; provided further,, that with respect to Incentive Stock Options granted to greater-than-10 percent (> 10%) shareholders of the Company (as determined with reference to Section 424(d) of the Code), the exercise price per share shall not be less than 110 percent (110%) of the fair market value per share of the Common Stock at the Date of Grant as determined by the Plan Administrator in good faith; and, provided further,, that Options granted in substitution for outstanding options of another corporation in connection with the merger, share exchange, acquisition of property or stock or other reorganization involving such other corporation and the Company or any subsidiary of the Company may be granted with an exercise price equal to the exercise price for the substituted option of the other corporation, subject to any adjustment consistent with the terms of the transaction pursuant to which the substitution is to occur.

(d) Duration of Options.

Options

At the time of the grant of the Option, the Plan Administrator shall designate, subject to Subsection 5(g) below, the expiration date of the Option, which date shall not be later than ten (10) years from the Date of Grant; provided,, that the expiration date of any Incentive Stock Option granted to a greater-than-10 percent (>10%) shareholder of the Company (as determined with reference to Section 424(d) of the Code) shall not be later than five (5) years from the Date of Grant. In the absence of action to the contrary by the Plan Administrator in connection with the grant of a particular Option, and except in the case of Incentive Stock Options as described above, all Options granted under this Section 5 shall expire ten (10) years from the Date of Grant.

(e) Vesting Schedule.

Schedule

No Option shall be exercisable until it has vested. The vesting schedule for each Option shall be fifty percent (50%thirty-three (33%) vested three (3)one (1) years from the Date of Grant, seventy-fivesixty-six percent (75%(66%) vested four (4)two (2) years from the Date of Grant, and one hundred percent (100%) vested five (5)three (3) years from the Date of Grant.

A-3    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

(f) Acceleration of Vesting.

Vesting

The vesting of one or more outstanding Options may be accelerated by the Plan Administrator at such times and in such amounts as it shall determine in its sole discretion. The vesting of Options also shall be accelerated under the circumstances described in Subsection 5(n) below.

(g) Term of Option.

Option

Vested Options shall terminate, to the extent not previously exercised, upon the occurrence of the first of the following events: (i) the expiration of the Option, as designated by the Plan Administrator in accordance with Subsection 5(d) above; (ii) the expiration of three (3) months following the date of an Optionee’s termination of employment with the Company, any Related Corporation or any affiliated company, as the case may be, other than as a result of death or Disability; or (iii) the expiration of six (6) months following (A) the date of death of the Optionee or (B) cessation of an Optionee’s employment by reason of Disability (as defined below). If an Optionee’s employment or contractual relationship is terminated by death, any Option held by the Optionee shall be exercisable only by the person or persons to whom such Optionee’s rights under such Option shall pass by the Optionee’s will or by the laws of descent and distribution of the state or country of the Optionee’s domicile at the time of death. For purposes of the 20142016 Option Plan, “Disability” shall mean


A-5





A-6



that the Optionee is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted, or can be expected to last, for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months. This definition of “Disability” is intended to comply with, and will be interpreted consistently with, sections 22(e)(3) and 422(c)(6) of the Code. Upon making a determination of Disability, the Plan Administrator shall, for purposes of the 20142016 Option Plan, determine the date of an Optionee’s termination of employment.

Unless accelerated in accordance with Subsection 5(f) above, unvested Options shall terminate immediately upon termination of employment of the Optionee by the Company or by the Optionee for any reason whatsoever, including death or Disability. For purposes of this 20142016 Option Plan, transfer of employment between or among the Company and/or any Related Corporation or affiliated company shall not be deemed to constitute a termination of employment with the Company or any Related Corporation or affiliated company. For purposes of this Subsection with respect to Incentive Stock Options, employment shall be deemed to continue while the Optionee is on military leave, sick leave or other bona fide leave of absence (as determined by the Plan Administrator). The foregoing notwithstanding, employment shall not be deemed to continue beyond the first ninety (90) days of such leave, unless the Optionee’s re-employment rights are guaranteed by statute or by contract.

(h) Exercise of Options.

Options

Options shall be exercisable, in full or in part, at any time after vesting, until their termination. If less than all of the shares included in the vested portion of any Option are purchased, the remainder may be purchased at any subsequent time prior to the expiration of the Option term. No portion of any Option for less than ten (10) shares (as adjusted pursuant to Subsection 5(m) below) may be exercised; provided,, that if the vested portion of any Option is less than ten (10) shares, it may be exercised with respect to all shares for which it is vested. Only whole shares may be issued pursuant to an Option, and to the extent that an Option covers less than one (1) share, it is unexercisable.

Options or portions thereof may be exercised by giving written notice to the Company, which notice shall specify the number of shares to be purchased, and be accompanied by payment in the amount of the aggregate exercise price for the Common Stock so purchased, which payment shall be in the form specified in Subsection 5(i) below. The Company shall not be obligated to issue, transfer or deliver a certificate of Common Stock to the Holder of any Option, until provision has been made by the Holder, to the satisfaction of the Company, for the payment of the aggregate exercise price for all shares for which the Option shall have been exercised and for satisfaction of any tax withholding obligations associated with such exercise. Except as set forth in the Agreement, during the lifetime of an Optionee, Options are exercisable only by the Optionee or a transferee who takes title to the Option in the manner permitted by Subsection 5(k) hereof.

A-4    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

(i) Payment upon Exercise of Option.

Upon the exercise of any Option, the aggregate exercise price shall be paid to the Company by wire transfer, or, if permitted by the Plan Administrator, in cash, by cashier’s check or any other method approved by the Plan Administrator. In addition, the Holder may pay for all or any portion of the aggregate exercise price by delivering to the Company shares of Common Stock previously held by such Holder which shall be valued at fair market value as of the date of exercise (as determined by the Plan Administrator).

(j) Rights as a Shareholder.

Shareholder

A Holder shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares covered by an Option until such Holder becomes a record holder of such shares, irrespective of whether such Holder has given notice of exercise. Subject to the provisions of Subsections 5(m) and 5(n) hereof, no rights shall accrue to a Holder and no adjustments shall be made on account of dividends (ordinary or extraordinary, whether in cash, securities or other property) or distributions or other rights declared on, or created in, the Common Stock for which the record date is prior to the date the Holder becomes a record holder of the shares of Common Stock covered by the Option, irrespective of whether such Holder has given notice of exercise.


A-7



(k) Transfer of Option.

Option

Options granted under this 20142016 Option Plan and the rights and privileges conferred by this 20142016 Option Plan may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated in any manner (whether by operation of law or otherwise) other than by will, by applicable laws of descent and distribution, and shall not be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Upon any attempt to transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of any Option or of any right or privilege conferred by this 20142016 Option Plan contrary to the provisions hereof, or upon the sale, levy or any attachment or similar process upon the rights and privileges conferred by this 20142016 Option Plan, such Option shall thereupon terminate and become null and void.

(l) Securities Regulation and& Tax Withholding.

(1)    Shares shall not be issued with respect to an Option unless the exercise of such Option and the issuance and delivery of such shares shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, Section 162(m) of the Code, any applicable state securities laws, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and the requirements of any stock exchange or automated inter-dealer quotation system of a registered national securities association upon which such shares may then be listed, and such issuance shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance, including the availability of an exemption from registration for the issuance and sale of such shares. The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body the authority deemed by the Company to be necessary for the lawful issuance and sale of any shares under this 20142016 Option Plan, or the unavailability of an exemption from registration for the issuance and sale of any shares under this 20142016 Option Plan, shall relieve the Company of any liability with respect to the non-issuancenon -issuance or sale of such shares.

As a condition to the exercise of an Option, the Plan Administrator may require the Holder to represent and warrant in writing at the time of such exercise that the shares are being purchased only for investment and without any then-present intention to sell or distribute such shares. At the option of the Plan Administrator, a stop-transfer order against such shares may be placed on the stock books and records of the Company, and a legend indicating that the stock may not be pledged, sold or otherwise transferredtransfer red unless an opinion of counsel is provided stating that such transfer is not in violation of any applicable law or regulation, may be stamped on the certificates representing such shares in order to assure an exemption from registration. The Plan Administrator also may require such other documentation as may from time to time be necessary to comply with Federal and state securities laws.

A-5    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

(2)    The Holder shall pay to the Company by wire transfer, certified or cashier’s check, unless another method is permitted by the Plan Administrator, promptly upon exercise of an Option or, if later, the date that the amount of such obligations becomes determinable, all applicable Federal, state, local and foreign withholding taxes that the Plan Administrator, in its discretion, determines to result upon exercise of an Option or from a transfer or other disposition of shares of Common Stock acquired upon exercise of an Option or otherwise related to an Option or shares of Common Stock acquired in connection with an Option.

(3)    The issuance, transfer or delivery of certificates of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of Options may be delayed, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, until the Plan Administrator is satisfied that the applicable requirements of the Federal and state securities laws and the withholding provisions of the Code have been met.

(m)    Stock Dividend or Reorganization.

Reorganization

(1)    If (i) the Company shall at any time be involved in a transaction described in Section 424(a) of the Code (or any successor provision) or any “corporate transaction” described in the regulations thereunder; (ii) the Company shall declare a dividend payable in, or shall subdivide or combine, its Common Stock or (iii) any other event with substantially the same effect shall occur, the Plan Administrator shall, subject to applicable law, with respect to each outstanding Option, proportionately adjust the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such Option and/or the exercise price per share so as to preserve the rights of the Holder substantially proportionate to the rights of the Holder prior to such event, and to the extent that such action shall include an increase or decrease in the number of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Options, the number of shares available under Section 4 of this 20142016 Option Plan


A-8





A-9



shall automatically be increased or decreased, as the case may be, proportionately, without further action on the part of the Plan Administrator, the Company, the Company’s shareholders, or any Holder.

(2)    In the event that the presently authorized capital stock of the Company is changed into the same number of shares with a different par value, or without par value, the stock resulting from any such change shall be deemed to be Common Stock within the meaning of the 20142016 Option Plan, and each Option shall apply to the same number of shares of such new stock as it applied to old shares immediately prior to such change.

(3)    The foregoing adjustments in the shares subject to Options shall be made by the Plan Administrator, or by any successor administrator of this 20142016 Option Plan, or by the applicable terms of any assumption or substitution document.

(4)    The grant of an Option shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure, to merge, consolidate or dissolve, to liquidate or to sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets.

(n)    Change in Control.

Control

(1)    If at any time there is a Change in Control (as defined below) of the Company, all Options outstanding at the date thereof shall accelerate and become fully vested and exercisable in full for the duration of the Option term as of the later of the date of the Change in Control or six months after the Date of Grant of the Option. For purposes of this Subsection, “Change in Control” shall mean either one of the following: (i) when any “person,” as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act as amended (other than the Company, a subsidiary thereof or a Company employee benefit plan, including any trustee of such plan acting as trustee) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or (ii) the occurrence of a transaction requiring shareholder approval, and involving the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation.

A-6    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

(2)    Except as provided in this Section 5, no Optionee or Holder shall have rights by reason of any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class including Common Stock or the payment of any stock dividend on shares of Common Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of shares of Common Stock, or by reason of any liquidation, dissolution, corporate combination or division; and any issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class including Common Stock, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class including Common Stock, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of shares of Common Stock subject to any Option.

6.    LIMITATION ON INDIVIDUAL OPTION GRANTS.

6.LIMITATION ON INDIVIDUAL OPTION GRANTS

No person shall be eligible to receive Options to purchase more than 100,000150,000 shares of Common Stock in the Option Grant Period as defined in Section 4 hereof.

7.    EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM.

7.EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM

The date on which this 20142016 Option Plan is adopted (the “Effective Date”) shall be the date of approval by the shareholders. No Option shall be granted by the Plan Administrator prior to the approval of this 20142016 Option Plan by a vote of the shareholders of the Company. For purposes of granting Options, the 20142016 Option Plan shall terminate at midnight on April 30, 2015,2017, unless terminated before then by the Plan Administrator and for other purposes the 20142016 Option Plan shall remain in effect as long as any Options are outstanding. In any event, the 20142016 Option Plan shall finally terminate no later than April 30, 2025.

8.    NO OBLIGATIONS TO EXERCISE OPTION.
2027.

8.NO OBLIGATIONS TO EXERCISE OPTION

The grant of an Option shall impose no obligation upon the Optionee to exercise such Option.

9.    NO RIGHT TO OPTIONS OR TO EMPLOYMENT.

9.NO RIGHT TO OPTIONS OR TO EMPLOYMENT

Whether or not any Options are to be granted under this 20142016 Option Plan shall be exclusively within the discretion of the Plan Administrator, and nothing contained in this 20142016 Option Plan shall be construed as giving any person any


A-10





A-11



right to participate under this 20142016 Option Plan. The grant of an Option shall in no way constitute any form of agreement or understanding binding on the Company, any Related Company or any affiliate, express or implied, that the Company, any Related Company or any affiliate will employ or contract with an Optionee for any length of time, nor shall it interfere in any way with the Company’s or, where applicable, a Related Company’s or affiliate’s right to terminate Optionee’s employment at any time, which right is hereby reserved.
10.    APPLICATION OF FUNDS.

10.APPLICATION OF FUNDS

The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of Options shall be used to purchase and retire Common Stock pursuant to Rule 10b-18 to the extent such transactions have been authorized by the Board and in other cases for general corporate purposes, unless otherwise directed by the Board.

11.    INDEMNIFICATION

A-7    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix A

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN ADMINISTRATOR.

11.INDEMNIFICATION OF PLAN ADMINISTRATOR

In addition to all other rights of indemnification they may have as members of the Board, members of the Plan Administrator shall be indemnified by the Company for all reasonable expenses and liabilities of any type or nature, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with any action, suit or proceeding to which they or any of them are a party by reason of, or in connection with, this 20142016 Option Plan or any Option granted under this 20142016 Option Plan, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided(provided that such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company), except to the extent that such expenses relate to matters for which it is adjudged that such Plan Administrator member is liable for willful misconduct; provided, that within fifteen (15) days after the institution of any such action, suit or proceeding, the Plan Administrator member involved therein shall, in writing, notify the Company of such action, suit or proceeding, so that the Company may have the opportunity to make appropriate arrangements to prosecute or defend the same.

12.    AMENDMENT OF 2014 OPTION PLAN.

12.AMENDMENT OF 2016 OPTION PLAN

The Plan Administrator may, at any time, modify, amend or terminate this 20142016 Option Plan or modify or amend Options granted under this 20142016 Option Plan, including, without limitation, such modifications or amendments as are necessary to maintain compliance with applicable statutes, rules or regulations; provided however,, no amendment with respect to an outstanding Option which has the effect of reducing the benefits afforded to the Holder thereof shall be made over the objection of such Holder, provided further,, that the Plan Administrator is prohibited from any downward modification of the Option Price established under Section 5(c) not specifically authorized in the 20142016 Option Plan. The Plan Administrator may condition the effectiveness of any such amendment on the receipt of shareholder approval at such time and in such manner as the Plan Administrator may consider necessary for the Company to comply with or to avail the Company and/or the Optionees of the benefits of any securities, tax, market listing or other administrative or regulatory requirement.

The Effective Date of this 20142016 Option Plan was established by vote of the shareholders of the Company held on May 7, 2014.


A-12
3, 2016.

A-8    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement




APPENDIXAppendix B

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

2014    |    2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of                 —, 2014,     2016 (the “Date of Grant”) between Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company”), and the option grant recipient (the “Optionee”).

WHEREAS, the Company has approved and adopted the 20142016 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), pursuant to which the Board of Directors is authorized to grant to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates stock options to purchase common stock, $.01Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the Company (the “Common Stock”);

WHEREAS, the Plan provides for the granting of stock options that either (i) are intended to qualify as “Incentive Stock Options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or (ii) do not qualify under Section 422 of the Code (“Non-Qualified Stock Options”);

WHEREAS, on                     —, 2014, 2016 (the “Date of Grant”), the Company authorized the grant to the Optionee of an [an Incentive Stock Option][a Non-QualifiedNon- Qualified Stock Option] to purchase shares of Common Stock (the “Option”);

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby grants to Optionee the option to purchase, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan, shares of Common Stock, as stated in the initial grant notice and/or Optionee’s account at a service provider’s stock option website. (At the time of this grant, Optionee views and accepts the Option at the self-service website of Solium Capital Inc.: http://www.solium.com/can_en/.)

1.    Type of Option.    This option is intended to be [an Incentive Stock Option][a Non-Qualified Stock Option].
2.    Date of Grant.    This option was granted on —, 2014.
3.    Exercise Price.    The exercise price for the Option shall be $— per share.
4.    Limitation on the Number of Shares.    The tax treatment set forth in Section 422 of the Code is subject to certain limitations. These limitations, which are described in Section 5(a) of the Plan and are based upon the Code, generally limit the number of shares that will qualify under Section 422 in any given calendar year. Under Section 5(a) any portion of an Option that exceeds the annual limit shall be a “Non-Qualified Stock Option.” The Company can make no representation that any of this Option will actually qualify under Section 422 when exercised.
5.    Vesting Schedule.
following website: (                                    .)

1.

  

Type of Option

This option is intended to be [an Incentive Stock Option][a Non-Qualified Stock Option].

2.

Date of Grant

This option was granted on                     , 2016.

3.

Exercise Price

The exercise price for the Option shall be $             per share.

4.

Limitation on the Number of Shares

The tax treatment set forth in Section 422 of the Code is subject to certain limitations. These limitations, which are described in Section 5(a) of the Plan and are based upon the Code, generally limit the number of shares that will qualify under Section 422 in any given calendar year. Under Section 5(a) any portion of an Option that exceeds the annual limit shall be a “Non-Qualified Stock Option.” The Company can make no representation that any of this Option will actually qualify under Section 422 when exercised.

5.

Vesting Schedule

Vesting Date

Portion of Total Option

Which Will Be Exercisable

, 201750%33% 
, 201875%66% 
, 2019100%100% 

Upon any Change in Control of the Company, as defined in the Plan, the Option shall accelerate and become fully vested and exercisable in accordance with Section 5(n) of the Plan

6.

Option Not Transferable

This Option may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated in any manner (whether by operation of law or otherwise) other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and shall not be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Should any of the foregoing occur, Section 4 of the Plan provides that this Option shall terminate and become null and void.

Upon any Change in Control

B-1    |    Notice of the Company, as defined in the Plan, the Option shall accelerate and become fully vested and exercisable in accordance with Section 5(n) of the Plan.


6.    Option Not Transferable.    This Option may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated in any manner (whether by operation of law or otherwise) other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and shall not be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Should any of the foregoing occur, Section 4 of the Plan provides that this Option shall terminate and become null and void.

B-1
Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement




7.    Investment Intent.    By accepting this Option, Optionee represents and agrees for himself, and all persons who acquire rights in this Option in accordance with the Plan through Optionee, that none of the shares of Common Stock purchased upon exercise of this Option will be distributed in violation of applicable federal and state laws and regulations, and Optionee shall furnish evidence satisfactory to the Company (including a written and signed representation letter and a consent to be bound by all transfer restrictions imposed by applicable law, legend condition, or otherwise) to that effect, prior to delivery of the purchased shares of Common Stock.
8.    Termination of Option.    A vested Option shall terminate, to the extent not previously exercised, upon the occurrence of the first of the following events:

Appendix B

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.    |    2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

(i)

7.

Investment Intent

By accepting this Option, Optionee represents and agrees for himself, and all persons who acquire rights in this Option in accordance with the Plan through Optionee, that none of the shares of Common Stock purchased upon exercise of this Option will be distributed in violation of applicable federal and state laws and regulations, and Optionee shall furnish evidence satisfactory to the Company (including a written and signed representation letter and a consent to be bound by all transfer restrictions imposed by applicable law, legend condition, or otherwise) to that effect, prior to delivery of the purchased shares of Common Stock.

8.

Termination of Option

A vested Option shall terminate, to the extent not previously exercised, upon the occurrence of the first of the following events:

(i) ten years from the Date of Grant;

(ii)

the expiration of three (3) months following the date of an Optionee’s termination of employment with the Company for any reason other than death or Disability; or

(iii)

the expiration of six (6) months following the date of death of the Optionee or the cessation of employment of the Optionee by reason of Disability.

In the event of death or Disability of the Optionee, the Option shall be exercisable only by the Optionee, the Optionee’s personal representative or administrator or guardian or the person or persons to whom the Optionee’s rights under the Option shall pass by the Optionee’s will or by the laws of descent and distribution of the state or county of the Optionee’s domicile at the time of death. Each unvested Option granted pursuant hereto shall terminate upon the Optionee’s termination of employment for any reason whatsoever, including death or Disability. For Incentive Stock Option purposes, “Disability” shall mean that the Optionee is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted, or can be expected to last, for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months. This definition of “Disability” is intended to comply with, and will be interpreted consistently with, Sections 22(e)(3) and 422(c)(6) of the Code.

9.

Stock

In the case of any stock split, stock dividend or like change in the nature of shares granted by this Agreement, the number of shares and option price shall be proportionately adjusted as set forth in Section 5(m) of the Plan.

10.

Exercise of Option

Each exercise of this Option shall be by means of written notice delivered to the Company at its principal executive office in Seattle, Washington, specifying the number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased. Upon each exercise of this Option, the full exercise price for the Common Stock to be purchased together with the amount necessary for the Company to satisfy its withholding obligation imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, if any, shall be paid to the Company by wire transfer, except to the extent another method of payment is permitted by the Plan Administrator. Alternatively, the Optionee may pay for all or any portion of the exercise price by delivery of previously acquired shares of Common Stock with a fair market value equal to or greater than the full exercise price or by complying with any other payment mechanism which the Plan Administrator may approve at the time of exercise. The exercise date of this Option shall be the date of the Company’s receipt of the full exercise price for the Common Stock to be purchased.

In the event

B-2    |    Notice of death or Disability of the Optionee, the Option shall be exercisable only by the Optionee, the Optionee's personal representative or administrator or guardian or the person or persons to whom the Optionee’s rights under the Option shall pass by the Optionee’s will or by the laws of descent and distribution of the state or county of the Optionee’s domicile at the time of death. Each unvested Option granted pursuant hereto shall terminate upon the Optionee’s termination of employment for any reason whatsoever, including death or Disability. For Incentive Stock Option purposes, “Disability” shall mean that the Optionee is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted, or can be expected to last, for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months. This definition of “Disability” is intended to comply with, and will be interpreted consistently with, Sections 22(e)(3) and 422(c)(6) of the Code.

9.    Stock.    In the case of any stock split, stock dividend or like change in the nature of shares granted by this Agreement, the number of shares and option price shall be proportionately adjusted as set forth in Section 5(m) of the Plan.
10.    Exercise of Option.    Each exercise of this Option shall be by means of written notice delivered to the Company at its principal executive office in Seattle, Washington, specifying the number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased. Upon each exercise of this Option, the full exercise price for the Common Stock to be purchased together with the amount necessary for the Company to satisfy its withholding obligation imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, if any, shall be paid to the Company by wire transfer, except to the extent another method of payment is permitted by the Plan Administrator. Alternatively, the Optionee may pay for all or any portion of the exercise price by delivery of previously acquired shares of Common Stock with a fair market value equal to or greater than the full exercise price or by complying with any other payment mechanism which the Plan Administrator may approve at the time of exercise. The exercise date of this Option shall be the date of the Company’s receipt of the full exercise price for the Common Stock to be purchased.
11.    Holding Period for Incentive Stock Options.    In order to obtain the favorable tax treatment currently provided by Section 422 of the Code, the shares of Common Stock must be sold, if at all, after a date which is the later of two (2) years from the date of grant of the Incentive Stock Option or one (1) year from the date upon which the Option is exercised. The Optionee agrees to report sales of such shares prior to the above determined date within one (1) business day after such sale is concluded.
12.    Optionee Acknowledgments.    Optionee acknowledges that he has read and understands the terms of this Agreement and that:
(a) The issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of this Option, the issuance of any securities with respect to such Common Stock by way of a stock dividend or stock split or in connection with a combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or reorganization, and any resale of any such shares of Common Stock, may only be effected in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”);

B-2
Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement




(b) By acceptance of the Option, he agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the Company harmless from and against loss or liability arising from the transfer of the Option or any Common Stock issued pursuant thereto or any interest therein in violation of the provisions of the Securities Act or of this Option Agreement;
(c) He agrees that prior to any exercise of the Option, he will seek access to all information relating to the merits and risks of acquiring Common Stock necessary to make an informed decision;
(d) He is not entitled to any rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares of Common Stock issuable hereunder until he becomes a shareholder of record;
(e) The shares of Common Stock subject hereto may be adjusted in the event of certain organic changes in the capital structure of the Company or for any other reason permitted by the Plan; and
(f) This Agreement does not constitute an employment agreement nor does it entitle Optionee to any specific employment or to employment for a period of time, and Optionee’s continued employment, if any, with the Company shall be at will and is subject to termination in accordance with the Company’s prevailing policies and any other agreement between Optionee and the Company.
13.    Professional Advice.    The acceptance and exercise of the Option and the sale of Common Stock issued pursuant to exercise of the Option may have consequences under federal and state tax and securities laws which may vary depending on the individual circumstances of the Optionee. Accordingly, the Optionee acknowledges that he has been advised to consult his personal legal and tax advisor in connection with this Agreement and his dealings with respect to the Option or the Common Stock.
14.    Notices.    Any notice required or permitted to be made or given hereunder shall be hand delivered or mailed by certified or registered mail to the Company’s address set forth below, or to the Optionee’s address on file at the Company’s Stock Administration department or as changed from time to time by written notice to the other.
Notices shall be deemed received and effective upon the earlier of (i) hand delivery to the recipient, (ii) five days after the date of postmark by the United States Postal Service or its successor or (iii) posting on the service provider’s stock option website.

Appendix B

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.    |    2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

Company:

11.

Holding Period for Incentive Stock Options

In order to obtain the favorable tax treatment currently provided by Section 422 of the Code, the shares of Common Stock must be sold, if at all, after a date which is the later of two (2) years from the date of grant of the Incentive Stock Option or one (1) year from the date upon which the Option is exercised. The Optionee agrees to report sales of such shares prior to the above determined date within one (1) business day after such sale is concluded.

12.

Optionee Acknowledgments

Optionee acknowledges that he has read and understands the terms of this Agreement and that:

(a) The issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of this Option, the issuance of any securities with respect to such Common Stock by way of a stock dividend or stock split or in connection with a combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or reorganization, and any resale of any such shares of Common Stock, may only be effected in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”);

(b) By acceptance of the Option, he agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the Company harmless from and against loss or liability arising from the transfer of the Option or any Common Stock issued pursuant thereto or any interest therein in violation of the provisions of the Securities Act or of this Option Agreement;
(c) He agrees that prior to any exercise of the Option, he will seek access to all information relating to the merits and risks of acquiring Common Stock necessary to make an informed decision;
(d) He is not entitled to any rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares of Common Stock issuable hereunder until he becomes a shareholder of record;
(e) The shares of Common Stock subject hereto may be adjusted in the event of certain organic changes in the capital structure of the Company or for any other reason permitted by the Plan; and

(f) This Agreement does not constitute an employment agreement nor does it entitle Optionee to any specific employment or to employment for a period of time, and Optionee’s continued employment, if any, with the Company shall be at will and is subject to termination in accordance with the Company’s prevailing policies and any other agreement between Optionee and the Company.

13.

Professional Advice

The acceptance and exercise of the Option and the sale of Common Stock issued pursuant to exercise of the Option may have consequences under federal and state tax and securities laws which may vary depending on the individual circumstances of the Optionee. Accordingly, the Optionee acknowledges that he has been advised to consult his personal legal and tax advisor in connection with this Agreement and his dealings with respect to the Option or the Common Stock.

B-3    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix B

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.    |    2016 STOCK OPTION PLAN

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

14.

Notices

Any notice required or permitted to be made or given hereunder shall be hand delivered or mailed by certified or registered mail to the Company’s address set forth below, or to the Optionee’s address on file at the Company’s Stock Administration department or as changed from time to time by written notice to the other.

Notices shall be deemed received and effective upon the earlier of (i) hand delivery to the recipient, (ii) five days after the date of postmark by the United States Postal Service or its successor or (iii) posting on the service provider’s stock option website.

Company  Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
  Attention: Stock Administration
  
1015 Third Avenue, 12th12th Floor
  

Seattle, Washington 98104

15.    Agreement Subject to Plan.    

15.

Agreement Subject to Plan

This Option and this Agreement evidencing and confirming the same are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and in any amendments to the Plan existing now or in the future, which terms and conditions are incorporated herein by reference. A copy will be made available upon request. Should any conflict exist between the provisions of the Plan and those of this Agreement, those of the Plan shall govern and control. This Agreement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between the Company and the Optionee with respect to the Option and shall be construed and enforced under the laws of the State of Washington. Any action brought with respect to this Option or the Plan shall be brought in a court in King County, Washington.

Dated as of theth day of, 2016
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC
By

          President and C.E.O.          

B-4    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT

TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

If Proposal No. 5 (Company-Sponsored Proposal to Implement Proxy Access) receives the requisite number of votes, the following amendments to implement proxy access would be made to the Company’s Bylaws:

Amend Article II to insert the following new Section 15A

(Inclusion of Shareholder Nominees in the Corporation’s Proxy Materials):

15A.    Inclusion of Shareholder Nominees in the Corporation’s Proxy Materials.

a.    Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in these Bylaws, the Plancorporation shall include in its proxy materials for an annual meeting of shareholders the name, together with the Required Information (as defined below), of one or more persons nominated for election (the “Shareholder Nominee”) to the Board of Directors by one or more shareholders that satisfy the requirements of this Article II(15A), including qualifying as an Eligible Shareholder (as defined below), and that expressly elects at the time of providing the written notice required by this Article II(15A) (a “Proxy Access Notice”) to have its nominee included in the corporation’s proxy materials pursuant to this Article II(15A). For the purposes of this Article II(15A):

i.    “Voting Stock” shall mean outstanding shares of capital stock of the corporation entitled to vote generally for the election of directors;

ii.    “Constituent Holder” shall mean any shareholder, collective investment fund included within a Qualifying Fund (as defined in paragraph (E) below) or beneficial holder whose stock ownership is counted for the purposes of qualifying as holding the Proxy Access Request Required Shares (as defined in paragraph (E) below) or qualifying as an Eligible Shareholder (as defined in paragraph (E) below);

iii.    “affiliate” and “associate” shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in Rule 405 under the Exchange Act; provided, however, that the term “partner” as used in the definition of “associate” shall not include any limited partner that is not involved in the management of the relevant partnership; and

iv.    a shareholder shall be deemed to “own” only those outstanding shares of Voting Stock as to which the shareholder (or any Constituent Holder) possesses both (a) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (b) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares. The number of shares calculated in accordance with the foregoing clauses (a) and (b) shall be deemed not to include (and to the extent any of the following arrangements have been entered into by affiliates of the shareholder (or of any Constituent Holder), shall be reduced by) any shares (x) sold by such shareholder (or any of its affiliates) in any amendmentstransaction that has not been settled or closed, including any short sale, (y) borrowed by such shareholder (or any of its affiliates) for any purposes or purchased by such shareholder (or any of its affiliates) pursuant to an agreement to resell or (z) subject to any option, warrant, forward contract, swap, contract of sale, other derivative or similar agreement entered into by such shareholder (or any of its affiliates), whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the Plan existing nownotional amount or value of Voting Stock, in any such case which instrument or agreement has, or is intended to have, or if exercised by either party thereto would have, the purpose or effect of (i) reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, which terms and conditionssuch shareholder’s (or affiliate’s) full right to vote or direct the voting of any such shares, and/or (ii) hedging, offsetting or altering to any degree gain or loss arising from the full economic ownership of such shares by such shareholder (or affiliate). A shareholder shall “own” shares held in the name of a nominee or other intermediary so long as the shareholder retains the right to instruct how the shares are incorporated herein by reference. A copy will be made available upon request. Should any conflict exist between the provisions of the Plan and those of this Agreement, those of the Plan shall govern and control. This Agreement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between the Company and the Optioneevoted with respect to the Optionelection of directors and shall be construedthe right to

C-1    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

direct the disposition thereof and enforced underpossesses the laws offull economic interest in the State of Washington. Any action broughtshares. A shareholder’s (including any Constituent Holder’s) voting rights with respect to this Option or the Planotherwise owned shares shall also be broughtdeemed to continue during such periods in a court in King County, Washington.

Dated as of the __ day of __, 2014.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
By
President and C.E.O.



B-3


























[This page intentionally left blank.]





APPENDIX C
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
2002 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

WHEREAS, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2002 Plan”); and

WHEREAS, amendment of the 2002 Plan is now considered desirable to increase the number ofwhich such person has (a) loaned such shares of the Company’s common stock available for purchase under the 2002 Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that by virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to the Company under Section 19 of the 2002 Plan, effective upon approval by shareholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting, the 2002 Plan is hereby amended in the following way:

1. Section 12(a)ordinary course of business so long as such person has retained the 2002 Plan shall be amendedunrestricted right to read in full as follows:

The maximum number ofrecall such shares of Stock which shall be made available for sale under the 2002 Plan shall be one million (1,000,000) shares plus any shares transferred to Reserves from the 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("1988 Plan") pursuant to Section 24, subject to further adjustment as provided in Section 18 hereof. In May of 2007, the Company increased the shares available under the 2002 Plan in the amount of 5,000,000 shares. In addition, effective May 7, 2014, the maximum number of shares of Stock which shall be made available for sale under the 2002 Plan shall be increased by an additional three million (3,000,000) shares, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 18 hereof. If, on a given Exercise Date, the number ofupon giving no more than five days’ notice or (b) delegated voting power over such shares with respect to which options area given annual meeting by means of a proxy, power of attorney or other instrument or arrangement so long as such delegation is revocable at any time by the shareholder. The terms “owned,” “owning” and other variations of the word “own” shall have correlative meanings.

b.    For the purposes of this Article II(15A), the “Required Information” that the corporation will include in its proxy statement is (1) the information concerning the Shareholder Nominee and the Eligible Shareholder that the corporation determines is required to be exercised exceeds the number of shares then available under the 2002 Plan, the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable.


2. Save and except as herein above expressly amended, the 2002 Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
2002 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

1. Purpose.
        The purpose of this 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2002 Plan") is to provide employees of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (the "Company"), its Subsidiaries and Consolidated Affiliates with an opportunity to purchase Stock of the Company through accumulated payroll deductions, enabling such persons to acquire or increase a proprietary interestdisclosed in the Company in order to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such persons and the Company's shareholders, and to provide a benefit that will assist the employer in competing to attract and retain employees of high quality. This 2002 Plan consists of two separate plans, one plan under which options ("Qualified Options") intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") are granted to employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries and another plan under which options ("Nonqualified Options") that do not so qualify are granted to employees of Consolidated Affiliates. Qualified and Nonqualified Options are referred to in the aggregate as "Options." It is the intention of the Company that the 2002 Plan qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under Section 423 of the Code. Accordingly, the provisions of the 2002 Plan shall be construed in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Code.
2. Definitions.
        For purposes of the 2002 Plan, the following terms shall be defined as set forth below, in addition to such terms as defined in Section 1 hereof:

C-1



        "Account" means the account maintained on behalf of the participantcorporation’s proxy statement by the Custodian for the purpose of investing in Stock and engaging in other transactions permittedregulations promulgated under the 2002 Plan.
        "Administrator" means the person or persons designated to administer the 2002 Plan under Section 13(a).
        "Base Pay" means regular straight time earnings, plus bonuses and overtime payments, payments for incentive compensation and other special payments except to the extent that any such item is specifically excluded from the definition of Base Pay by the Committee.
        "Board" means the Company's Board of Directors.
        "Change in Control" means either one of the following: (i) when any ‘person,‘ as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, (other thanand (2) if the Company,Eligible Shareholder so elects, a subsidiary thereofStatement (as defined below). The corporation shall also include the name of the Shareholder Nominee in its proxy card. For the avoidance of doubt, and any other provision of these Bylaws notwithstanding, the corporation may in its sole discretion solicit against, and include in the proxy statement its own statements or a Company employee benefit plan,other information relating to, any Eligible Shareholder and/or Shareholder Nominee, including any trustee of such plan acting as trustee) becomes the ‘beneficial owner‘ (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities; or (ii) the occurrence of a transaction requiring shareholder approval, and involving the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation.
        "Committee" means the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee of two or more non-employee directors that may be designated by the Board to administer the 2002 Plan.
        "Consolidated Affiliates" means entities where the Company maintains unilateral control over assets and operations and where the existence of the parent subsidiary relationship is maintained by means other than record ownership of voting stock.
        "Custodian" means a custodian or any successor thereto as appointed by the Committee from time to time.
        "Employee" means any individual employed continuously for at least sixty (60) days priorinformation provided to the Enrollment Date by the Company, Subsidiary or a Consolidated Affiliate as a Full Time Employee.
        "Enrollment Date" means the first day of the next Offering Period.
        "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended.
        "Exercise Date" means the last day of each Offering Period.         
"Fair Market Value" means the last sale price for the Common Stock of the Company as reported on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System, or if the stock is traded on a stock exchange, the closing price for the stock on the principal such exchange or, if that day is not a Trading Day, then on the latest previous Trading Day.
        "Full Time Employee" means an employee whose customary employment with the Company, Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate is more than 20 hours per week and more than five months per year.
        "Offering Period" means the approximately one-year period commencing on the first Trading Day of August and terminating on the last Trading Day of the following July. The beginning and ending dates and duration of Offering Periods may be changed pursuant to Section 4 of the 2002 Plan.
        "Purchase Price" means an amount equal to 85 percent of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the Enrollment Date or 85 percent of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the Exercise Date, whichever is lower.
        "Reserves" means the number of shares of Stock covered by all options under the 2002 Plan which have not yet been exercised and the number of shares of Stock which have been authorized for issuance under the 2002 Plan, but which have not yet become subject to options.
        "Stock" means the Company's Common Stock, and such other securities as may be substituted for Stock pursuant to Section 18 hereof.

C-2



        "Subsidiary" means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations (other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain) owns stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.
        "Trading Day" means a day on which the New York Stock Exchange is open for trading.
3. Eligibility.
        (a)  All Employees (as determined in accordance with Section 2 hereof) of the Company, Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate on a given Enrollment Date shall be eligible to participate in the 2002 Plan, subject to Section 5(a).
        (b)  Any provisions of the 2002 Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no Employee shall be granted an option under the 2002 Plan (i) to the extent that, immediately after the grant, such Employee (or any other person whose Stock would be attributed to such Employee pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code) would own capital stock and/or hold outstanding options to purchase such stock possessing five percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of the capital stock of the Company or of any Subsidiary, (ii) to the extent that his or her rights to purchase stock under all employee stock purchase plans of the Company and its Subsidiaries accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 worth of stock (determined at the fair market value of the shares at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time, or (iii) in excess of 3,000 shares of stock for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time.
        (c)  All participants in the 2002 Plan shall have equal rights and privileges (subject to the terms of the 2002 Plan) with respect to options outstanding during any given Offering Period.
4. Offering Periods.
        The 2002 Plan shall have consecutive Offering Periods with an initial Offering Period commencing on the first Trading Day in August, 2002 and terminating in the last Trading Day of July, 2003. The Committee shall have the power to change the beginning date, ending date and duration of Offering Periods with respect to future offerings without shareholder approval if such change is announced at least five days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected thereafter, provided that Offering Periods will in all cases comply with applicable limitations under Section 423(b)(7) of the Code.
5. Participation.
        (a)  Any person who will be an eligible Employee on a given Enrollment Date may become a participant in the 2002 Plan by completing a subscription agreement authorizing payroll deductions and filing it with the Administrator before such Enrollment Date.
        (b)  Payroll deductions for a participant shall commence on the first payroll following the Enrollment Date and shall end on the last payroll in the Offering Period to which such authorization is applicable, unless sooner terminated by the participant as provided in Section 10 hereof.
6. Payroll Deductions.
        (a)  At the time a participant files his or her subscription agreement, he or she shall elect to have payroll deductions made on each pay day during the Offering Period in a regular amount, expressed as a percentage, not to exceed 10% of Base Pay.
        (b)  All payroll deductions made for a participant shall be credited to his or her Account under the 2002 Plan. A participant may not make any additional payments into such Account.
        (c)  A participant may discontinue his or her participation in the 2002 Plan as provided in Section 10 hereof. Unless otherwise authorized by the Committee, a participant may not change his or her payroll deduction rate during any Offering Period. Absent Committee authorization, any change in the rate shall be effective as of the next Offering Period. A participant's subscription agreement shall remain in effect for successive Offering Periods unless terminated as provided in Section 10 hereof.

C-3



        (d)  The foregoing notwithstanding, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code and Section 3(b) hereof, a participant's payroll deductions may be terminated at such time during any Offering Period which is scheduled to end during the current calendar year (the "Current Offering Period") that the aggregate of all payroll deductions accumulated with respect to the Current Offering Period equals $21,250 (or such other limit as may apply under Code Section 423(b)(8)). Payroll deductionsforegoing.

c.    To be timely, an Eligible Shareholder’s Proxy Access Notice shall recommencebe delivered to the Secretary at the rate providedprincipal executive offices of the corporation not earlier than the close of business on the 150th day and not later than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date the corporation mailed its proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting, or the announcement thereof, commence a new time period for the giving of an Eligible Shareholder’s Proxy Access Notice as described above.

d.    The number of Shareholder Nominees (including Shareholder Nominees that were submitted by an Eligible Shareholder for inclusion in such participant's subscription agreement (as previouslythe corporation’s proxy materials pursuant to this Article II(15A) but either are subsequently withdrawn or that the Board of Directors decides to nominate as Board of Directors’ nominees) appearing in the corporation’s proxy materials with respect to an annual meeting of shareholders shall be the largest whole number that does not exceed 20% of the number of directors in office as of the last day on file or as changedwhich a Proxy Access Notice may be delivered in accordance with Section 6(c)) at the beginningprocedures set forth in this Article II(15A) (such greater number, the “Permitted Number”); provided, however, that the Permitted Number shall be reduced by the number of the next Offering Period which is scheduled to enddirectors in office that will be included in the following calendar year, unless terminated by the participant as provided in Section 10 hereof.

        (e)  The Company, Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate is authorized to withhold from any payment to be made to a participant, including any payroll and other payments not related to the 2002 Plan, amounts of withholding and other taxes due in connection with any transaction under the 2002 Plan, including any disposition of shares acquired under the 2002 Plan, and a participant's enrollment in the 2002 Plan will be deemed to constitute his or her consent to such withholding. At the time of a participant's exercise of an option or disposition of shares acquired under the 2002 Plan, the Company may require the participant to make other arrangements to meet tax withholding obligations as a condition to the exercise of rights or distribution of shares or cash from the participant's Account. In addition, a Participant may be required to advise the Company of sales and other dispositions of Stock acquired under the 2002 Plan in order to permit the Company to comply with tax laws and to claim any tax deductions to which the Company may be entitledcorporation’s proxy materials with respect to the 2002 Plan.
7. Grant of Option.
        On the Enrollment Date of each Offering Period, each eligible Employee participating in such Offering Period shall be granted an option to purchase on the Exercise Date of such Offering Period, at the applicable Purchase Price, up to a number of shares of Stock determined by dividing such Employee's payroll deductions accumulated prior to such Exercise Date and retained in the Participant's Account as of the Exercise Date by the applicable Purchase Price; provided that such purchase shall be subjectannual meeting for whom access to the limitations set forth in Sections 3(b) and 12 hereof. Exercise of the option shall occur ascorporation’s proxy materials was previously provided in Section 8 hereof, unless the participant has withdrawnor requested pursuant to Section 10 hereof.
8. Exercise of Option.
        Participant's option for the purchase of shares shall be exercised automatically on the Exercise Date, and the maximum number of shares subject to option shall be purchased for such participant at the applicable Purchase Price with the accumulated payroll deductions in his or her Account. Shares purchased shall include fractional shares calculated to at least three decimal places, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. If fractional shares are not to be purchased for a participant's Account, any payroll deductions accumulated in a participant's Account not sufficient to purchase a full share shall be retained in the participant's Account for the subsequent Offering Period, subject to earlier withdrawal by the participant as provided in Section 10 hereof. During a participant's lifetime, a participant's option to purchase shares hereunder is exercisable only by him or her.
9. Delivery of Shares; Participant Accounts.
        (a)  At or as promptly as practicable after the Exercise Date for an Offering Period, the Company will deliver the shares of Stock purchased to the Custodian for deposit into the participant's Account.
        (b)  Cash dividends on any Stock credited to a participant's Account will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of Stock; such amounts will not be available in the form of cash to participants. All cash dividends paid on Stock credited to participants' Accounts will be paid over by the Company to the Custodian at the dividend payment date. The Custodian will aggregate all purchases of Stock in connection with the 2002 Plan for a given dividend payment date. Purchases of Stock for purposes of dividend reinvestment will be made as promptly as practicable (but not morethis Article II(15A), other than 30 days) after a dividend payment date. The Custodian will make such purchases, as directed by the Committee, in transactions on any securities exchange upon which Stock is traded, otherwise in the over-the-counter market, or in negotiated transactions. Any shares of Stock distributed as a dividend or distribution in respect of shares of Stock or in connection with a split of the Stock credited to a participant's Account will be credited to such Account. In the event of any other non-cash dividend or distribution in respect of Stock credited to a participant's Account, the Custodian will, if

C-4



reasonably practicable and at the direction of the Committee, sell any property received in such dividend or distribution as promptly as practicable and use the proceeds to purchase additional shares of Common Stock in the same manner as cash paid over to the Custodian for purposes of dividend reinvestment.
        (c)  Each participant will be entitled to vote the number of shares of Stock credited to his or her Account (including any fractional shares credited to such Account) on any matter as to which the approval of the Company's shareholders is sought. If a participant does not vote or grant a valid proxy with respect to shares credited to his or her Account, such shares will be voted by the Custodian in accordance with any stock exchange or other rules governing the Custodian in the voting of shares held for customer accounts. Similar procedures will apply in the case of any consent solicitation of Company shareholders.
10. Withdrawal of Payroll Deductions or Shares; Termination of Employment.
        (a)  If a participant terminates his or her payroll deduction rate during an Offering Period, the cash balance contributed for the year shall be refunded as soon as practicable. Payroll deductions shall not automatically resume at the beginning of the succeeding Offering Period unless such individual delivers to the Administrator a new subscription agreement.
        (b)  Upon a participant's ceasing to be an Employee for any reason (including upon the participant's death), he or she shall be deemed to have elected to withdraw from the 2002 Plan and the payroll deductions credited to such participant's Account during the Offering Period but not yet used to exercise the option shall be returned to such participant as soon as practicable or, in the case of his or her death, to the person or persons entitled thereto under Section 14 hereof, and such participant's option shall be automatically terminated.
        (c)  If a participant elects to withdraw shares from his or her Account, one or more certificates for whole shares shall be issued in the name of, and delivered to, the participant, with such participant receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares based on the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of withdrawal. If shares of Stock are transferred from a participant's Account to a broker-dealer or financial institution that maintains an account for the participant, only whole shares shall be transferred and cash in lieu of any fractional share shall be paid to such participant based on the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of transfer. A participant seeking to withdraw or transfer shares of Stock must give instructions to the Custodian in such manner and form as may be prescribed by the Committee and the Custodian, which instructions will be acted upon as promptly as practicable. Withdrawals and transfers will be subject to any fees imposed in accordance with Section 10(e) hereof.
        (d)  Upon a participant's ceasing to be an Employee for any reason, the Custodian will continue to maintain the participant's Account until the earlier of such time as the participant withdraws or transfers all Stock in the Account or one year after the participant ceases to be employed by the Company, its Subsidiaries or Consolidated Affiliates. At the expiration of such one-year period, the assets in participant's Account shall be withdrawn or transferred as elected by the participant or, in the absence of such election, as determined by the Committee.
        (e)  Costs and expenses incurred in the administration of the 2002 Plan and maintenance of Accounts will be paid by the Company, including annual fees of the Custodian and any brokerage fees and commissions for the purchase of Stock upon reinvestment of dividends and distributions. The foregoing notwithstanding, the Custodian may impose or pass through a reasonable fee for the withdrawal of Stock in the form of stock certificates (as permitted under Section 10(c)), and reasonable fees for other services unrelated to the purchase of Stock under the 2002 Plan, to the extent approved in writing by the Company and communicated to participants. In no circumstance shall the Company pay any brokerage fees and commissions for the sale of Stock acquired under the 2002 Plan by a participant.
11. Interest.
        No interest shall accrue on the payroll deductions of a participant in the 2002 Plan.
12. Stock.
        (a)  The maximum number of shares of Stock which shall be made available for sale under the 2002 Plan shall be one million (1,000,000) shares plus any shares transferred to Reserves from the 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("1988 Plan") pursuant to Section 24, subject to further adjustment as provided in Section 18 hereof. If, on a given

C-5



Exercise Date, the number of shares with respect to which options are to be exercised exceeds the number of shares then available under the 2002 Plan, the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable.
        (b)  The participant shall have no interest or voting right in shares purchasable upon exercise of his or her option until such option has been exercised.
        (c)  Shares acquired through dividend reinvestment shall be purchased on the open market unless otherwise determined by the Committee.
13. Administration.
        (a)  The 2002 Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have full and final authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the 2002 Plan, to determine eligibility and to adjudicate all disputed claims filed under the 2002 Plan. The Committee may, in its discretion, delegate authority to the Administrator. Every finding, decision and determination made by the Committee or Administrator shall, to the full extent permitted by law, be final and binding upon all parties (except for any reserved right of the Committee to review a finding, decision or determination of the Administrator). The Committee, Administrator, and each member thereof shall be entitled to, in good faith, rely or act upon any report or other information furnished to him or her by any executive officer, other officer or employee of the Company, Subsidiary, Consolidated Affiliate, the Company's independent auditors, consultants or any other agents assisting in the administration of the 2002 Plan. Members of the Committee or Administrator and any officer or employee of the Company, Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate acting at the direction or on behalf of the Committee shall not be personally liable for any action or determination taken or made in good faith with respect to the 2002 Plan, and shall, to the extent permitted by law, be fully indemnified and protected by the Company with respect to any such action or determination.
        (b)  The Custodian will act as custodian under the 2002 Plan, and will perform such duties as are set forth in the 2002 Plan and in any agreement between the Company and the Custodian. The Custodian will establish and maintain, as agent for each participant, an Account and any sub-accounts as may be necessary or desirable for the administration of the 2002 Plan.
14. Designation of Beneficiary.
        (a)  A participant may file a written designation of a beneficiarydirector who is to receive shares and cash, if any, from the participant's Account under the 2002 Plan in the event of (i) such participant's death subsequent to an Exercise Date on which the option is exercised, but prior to a distribution to such participant of shares or cash then held in the participant's Account or (ii) such participant's death prior to exercise of the option. If a participant is married and the designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent shall be required for such designation to be effective.
        (b)  Subject to spousal consent, if applicable, such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the participant at any time by written notice. In the event of the death of a participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under the 2002 Plan who is living at the time of such participant's death, any shares or cash otherwise deliverable under Section 14(a) shall be delivered to the participant's estate.
15. Transferability.
        Neither payroll deductions credited toannual meeting will have served as a participant's Account nor any rights with regard to the exercisedirector continuously, as a nominee of an option or to receive shares under the 2002 Plan may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way (other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or as provided in Section 14 hereof) by the participant. Any such attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition shall be without effect.
16. Use of Funds.
        All payroll deductions received or held by the Company under the 2002 Plan may be used by the Company for any corporate purpose, and the Company shall not be obligated to segregate such payroll deductions.
17. Reports.
        An individual Account shall be maintained by the Custodian for each participant in the 2002 Plan. Statements of Account shall be given to each participant at least annually, which statements shall set forth the amounts of payroll

C-6



deductions, the Purchase Price, the number of shares purchased, any remaining cash balance, and other information deemed relevant by the Committee.
18. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution, Liquidation, or Change in Control.
        (a)  Changes in Capitalization. The Committee shall proportionately adjust the Reserves and the price per share and the number of shares of Stock covered by each option under the 2002 Plan which has not yet been exercised for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Stock, or other extraordinary corporate event which affects the Stock in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants. The determination of the Committee with respect to any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.
        (b)  Dissolution or Liquidation. In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Offering Period shall terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action, unless otherwise provided by the Committee.
        (c)  Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, the Committee shall shorten the Offering Period then in progress by setting a new Exercise Date (the "New Exercise Date"). The New Exercise Date shall be before the date that will constitute the Change in Control. The Committee shall notify each participant in writing, at least ten business days prior to the New Exercise Date, that the Exercise Date for the participant's option has been changed to the New Exercise Date and that the participant's option shall be exercised automatically on the New Exercise Date, unless prior to such date the participant has withdrawn from the Offering Period as provided in Section 10 hereof.
19. Amendment or Termination.
        (a)  The Board may at any time and for any reason terminate or amend the 2002 Plan. Except as provided in Section 18 hereof, no such termination can affect options previously granted, provided that an Offering Period may be terminated by the Board of Directors, by shorteningfor at least three annual terms; and, provided, further, that in the Offering Period and acceleratingevent the Exercise DateBoard of Directors resolves to a date notreduce the size of the Board of Directors effective on or prior to the date of the annual meeting, the Permitted Number shall be calculated based on the number of directors in office as so reduced. Any Eligible Shareholder submitting more than one Shareholder Nominee for inclusion in the corporation’s proxy materials pursuant to this Article II(15A) shall (i) rank such Board action ifShareholder Nominees based on the Board determinesorder that terminationthe Eligible Shareholder desires such Shareholder Nominees to be selected for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy statement in the event that the number of Shareholder Nominees submitted by Eligible Shareholders pursuant to this Article II(15A) exceeds the Permitted Number and (ii) explicitly specify and include the respective rankings referred to in the foregoing clause (i) in the Proxy Access Notice delivered to the corporation with respect to all Shareholder Nominee(s) submitted pursuant thereto. In the event that the number of Shareholder Nominees submitted by Eligible Shareholders pursuant to this Article II(15A) exceeds the Permitted Number, the highest ranking Shareholder Nominee who meets the requirements of this Article II(15A) from each Eligible Shareholder will be selected for inclusion in the corporation’s proxy materials until the Permitted Number is reached, going in order of the 2002 Planamount (largest to

C-2    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

smallest) of shares of Voting Stock each Eligible Shareholder disclosed as owned in its Proxy Access Notice submitted to the corporation. If the Permitted Number is innot reached after each Eligible Shareholder has selected one Shareholder Nominee, this selection process will continue as many times as necessary, following the best interestssame order each time, until the Permitted Number is reached.

e.    An “Eligible Shareholder” is one or more shareholders of record who own and have owned, or are acting on behalf of one or more beneficial owners who own and have owned (in each case as defined above), continuously for at least three (3) years as of both the date that the Proxy Access Notice is received by the corporation pursuant to this Article II(15A), and as of the Companyrecord date for determining shareholders eligible to vote at the annual meeting, at least 3% of the aggregate voting power of the Voting Stock (the “Proxy Access Request Required Shares”), and its shareholders. Exceptwho continue to own the Proxy Access Request Required Shares at all times between the date such Proxy Access Notice is received by the corporation and the date of the applicable annual meeting, provided that the aggregate number of shareholders, and, if and to the extent that a shareholder is acting on behalf of one or more beneficial owners, of such beneficial owners, whose stock ownership is counted for the purpose of satisfying the foregoing ownership requirement shall not exceed twenty (20). Two or more collective investment funds that are part of the same fund family by virtue of being: (1) under common management and investment control, (2) being under common management control and primarily sponsored by the same employer or (3) constituting a “group of investment companies” as providedsuch term is defined in Section 1812(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (a “Qualifying Fund”) shall be treated as one shareholder for the purpose of determining the aggregate number of shareholders in this paragraph (e), provided that each fund included within a Qualifying Fund otherwise meets the requirements set forth in this Article II(15A). A shareholder (including any individual member of a Qualifying Fund) may not attribute any of its shares to more than one group constituting an Eligible Shareholder under this Article II(15A), and no shares may be attributed to more than one group constituting an Eligible Shareholder under this Section 19, no amendment may make any changeArticle II(15A). A record holder acting on behalf of one or more beneficial owners will not be counted separately as a shareholder with respect to the shares owned by beneficial owners on whose behalf such record holder has been directed in any option theretofore granted which materially adversely affects the rights of any participant, and any amendmentwriting to act, but each such beneficial owner will be counted separately, subject to the approvalother provisions of this paragraph (e), for purposes of determining the number of shareholders whose holdings may be considered as part of an Eligible Shareholder’s holdings. For the avoidance of doubt, Proxy Access Request Required Shares will qualify as such if and only if the beneficial owner of such shares as of the Company's shareholders notdate of the Proxy Access Notice has itself individually beneficially owned such shares continuously for the three-year period ending on that date and through the other applicable dates referred to above (in addition to the other applicable requirements being met).

f.    No later than the final date when a nomination pursuant to this Article II(15A) may be delivered to the corporation pursuant to a Proxy Access Notice, an Eligible Shareholder (including each Constituent Holder) must provide the following information in writing to the Secretary of the corporation:

i.    the information required to be included in a Noticing Shareholder’s notice under Article II(15)(b);

ii.    one yearor more written statements from the record holder of the shares (and from each intermediary through which the shares are or have been held during the requisite three (3)-year holding period) verifying that, as of a date within seven calendar days prior to the date the Proxy Access Notice is delivered to the corporation, such person owns, and has owned continuously for the preceding three (3) years, the Proxy Access Request Required Shares, and such person’s agreement to provide:

A.    within ten (10) days after Board approvalthe record date for the annual meeting, written statements from the record holder and intermediaries verifying such person’s continuous ownership of the Proxy Access Request Required Shares through the record date, together with any additional information reasonably requested to verify such person’s ownership of the Proxy Access Request Required Shares; and

C-3    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

B.    immediate notice if the Eligible Shareholder ceases to own any of the Proxy Access Request Required Shares prior to the date of the applicable annual meeting of shareholders;

iii.    any information relating to such Eligible Shareholder (including any Constituent Holder) and their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, and any information relating to such Eligible Shareholder’s Shareholder Nominee(s), in each case that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement and form of proxy or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for the election of such amendmentShareholder Nominee(s) in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;

iv.    a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three (3) years, and any other material relationships, between or among the Eligible Shareholder (including any Constituent Holder) and its or their respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the one hand, and each of such Eligible Shareholder’s Shareholder Nominee(s), and his or her respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the other hand, including without limitation all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K (without giving effect to the monetary thresholds contemplated by Rule 404) if the Eligible Shareholder (including any Constituent Holder), or any affiliate or associate thereof or person acting in concert therewith, were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the Shareholder Nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant;

v.    a representation that such person:

A.    acquired the Proxy Access Request Required Shares (and any other shares acquired by such person) in the ordinary course of business and not with the intent to change or influence control of the corporation, and does not presently have such intent;

B.    has not nominated and will not nominate for election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting any person other than the Shareholder Nominee(s) being nominated pursuant to this Article II(15A);

C.    has not engaged and will not engage in, and has not and will not be a “participant” in another person’s, “solicitation” within the meaning of Rule 14a-1(l) under the Exchange Act in support of the election of any individual as a director at the annual meeting other than its Shareholder Nominee(s) or a nominee of the Board of Directors;

D.    will not distribute to any shareholder any form of proxy for the annual meeting other than the form distributed by the corporation; and

E.    will hold the Proxy Access Request Required Shares through the date of the annual meeting;

F.    will provide facts, statements and other information in all communications with the corporation and its shareholders that are and will be true and correct in all material respects and do not and will not omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and will otherwise comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in connection with any actions taken pursuant to this Article II(15A);

C-4    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

vi.    in the case of a nomination by a group of shareholders that together is such an Eligible Shareholder, the designation by all group members of one group member that is authorized to act on behalf of all members of the nominating shareholder group with respect to the nomination and matters related thereto, including withdrawal of the nomination; and

vii.    an undertaking that such person agrees to:

A.    assume all liability (which shall be joint and several with respect to other group members if any), and indemnify and hold harmless the corporation and each of its directors, officers and employees individually against any liability, expense, loss or damages in connection with any threatened or pending action, suit or proceeding, whether legal, administrative or investigative, against the corporation or any of its directors, officers or employees arising out of or relating to (1) any legal or regulatory violation arising out of the Eligible Shareholder’s communications with the shareholders of the corporation, (2) information that the Eligible Shareholder provided to the corporation or (3) any failure or alleged failure of the Eligible Shareholder to comply with, or any breach or alleged breach of, its obligations, agreements or representations pursuant to these Bylaws;

B.    comply with all laws, rules, regulations and listing standards applicable to nominations or solicitations in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders;

C.    promptly provide to the corporation such other information as may be reasonably requested by the corporation; and

D.    file with the Securities and Exchange Commission any solicitation(s) by the Eligible Shareholder of shareholders of the corporation relating to the annual meeting at which the Shareholder Nominee will be nominated.

In addition, no later than the final date when a nomination pursuant to this Article II(15A) may be delivered to the corporation pursuant to a Proxy Access Notice, a Qualifying Fund whose stock ownership is counted for purposes of qualifying as an Eligible Shareholder must provide to the Secretary of the corporation documentation reasonably satisfactory to the Board of Directors that demonstrates that the funds included within the Qualifying Fund satisfy the definition thereof. In order to be considered timely, any information required by this Article II(15A) to be provided to the corporation must be supplemented (by delivery to the Secretary of the corporation) (1) no later than ten (10) days following the record date for the applicable annual meeting, to disclose the foregoing information as of such record date, and (2) no later than the fifth day before the annual meeting, to disclose the foregoing information as of the date that is ten (10) days prior to such annual meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, the requirement to update and supplement such information shall not permit any Eligible Shareholder or other person to change or add any proposed Shareholder Nominee or be deemed to cure any defects or limit the remedies (including without limitation under these Bylaws) available to the corporation relating to any defect.

g.    The Eligible Shareholder may provide to the Secretary of the corporation, at the time the information required by this Article II(15A) is originally provided, a written statement for inclusion in the corporation’s proxy statement for the annual meeting, not to exceed 500 words, in support of the candidacy of such Eligible Shareholder’s Shareholder Nominee(s) (the “Statement”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Article II(15A), the corporation may omit from its proxy materials any information or Statement that it, in good faith, believes is materially false or misleading; omits to state any material fact; directly or indirectly impugns the character, integrity or personal reputation of, or makes charges concerning improper, illegal or immoral conduct or associations with respect to, any person without factual foundation; or would violate any applicable law or regulation.

C-5    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

h.    No later than the final date when a nomination pursuant to this Article II(15A) may be delivered to the corporation pursuant to a Proxy Access Notice, each Shareholder Nominee must:

i.    provide a completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement pursuant to Article II(16) of these Bylaws;

ii.    provide such additional information as necessary to permit the corporation to determine if any of the matters raised under paragraph (J) below apply or if such shareholder approvalShareholder Nominee:

A.    has any direct or indirect relationship with the corporation other than those relationships that have been deemed categorically immaterial pursuant to the corporation’s Governance Guidelines;

B.    is required bynot and has not been subject to any Federalevent specified in Item 401(f)(1)-(8) of Regulation S-K (or successor rule) of the Exchange Act or state law or regulation orRule 506(d)(1) of Regulation D (or successor rule) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

C.    meets the audit committee independence requirements under the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the Stock may then be listed or quoted, or if such shareholder approvalcorporation’s securities are traded;

D.    is necessary in ordera “non-employee director” for the 2002 Plan to continue to meetpurposes of Rule 16b-3 under the requirementsExchange Act (or any successor rule); and

E.    is an “outside director” for the purposes of Section 423162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (or any successor provision).

In the event that any information or communications provided by the Eligible Shareholder (or any Constituent Holder) or the Shareholder Nominee to the corporation or its shareholders ceases to be true and correct in all material respects or omits a material fact necessary to make the Boardstatements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, each Eligible Shareholder or Shareholder Nominee, as the case may otherwise,be, shall promptly notify the Secretary of the corporation of any defect in its discretion, determinesuch previously provided information and of the information that is required to submitcorrect any amendment to shareholderssuch defect; it being understood for approval. For the avoidance of doubt that providing any actionsuch notification shall not be deemed to changecure any such defect or limit the purchase priceremedies (including without limitation under these Bylaws) available to the corporation relating to any such defect.

i.    Any Shareholder Nominee who is included in the corporation’s proxy materials for a particular annual meeting of sharesshareholders but withdraws from or becomes ineligible or unavailable for election at that annual meeting (other than by reason of such Shareholder Nominee’s disability or other health reason) will be ineligible to be made availablea Shareholder Nominee pursuant to this Article II(15A) for sale under the 2002 Plan shall always be subject to shareholder approval.

        (b)  Without shareholder consent and without regard to whether any participant rights may be considered to have been "adversely affected," the Committee shall be entitled to change the Offering Periods, limit the frequency and/or number of changesnext two annual meetings. Any Shareholder Nominee who is included in the amount withheld during an Offering Period, establishcorporation’s proxy statement for a particular annual meeting of shareholders, but subsequently is determined not to satisfy the exchange ratio applicable to amounts withheld in a currencyeligibility requirements of this Article II(15A) or any other than U.S. Dollars, permit payroll withholding in excessprovision of the amount designated by a participant in order to adjustcorporation’s Bylaws, Certificate of Incorporation or other applicable regulation any time before the annual meeting of shareholders, will not be eligible for delays or mistakes inelection at the Company's processingrelevant annual meeting of properly completed withholding elections, establish reasonable waiting and adjustment periods and/or accounting and crediting procedures to ensure that amounts applied toward the purchaseshareholders.

C-6    |    Notice of Stock for each participant properly correspond with amounts withheld from the participant's compensation, and establish such other limitations or procedures as the Committee determines in its sole discretion are advisable and consistent with the 2002 Plan. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may, butAnnual Meeting & Proxy Statement


Appendix C

FORM OF BYLAW AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENT PROXY ACCESS

j.    The corporation shall not be required to modifyinclude, pursuant to this Article II(15A), a Shareholder Nominee in its proxy materials for any annual meeting of shareholders, or, eliminate grantsif the proxy statement already has been filed, to persons who are otherwise eligible to receive options under this 2002 Plan who are foreign nationals or employed outsideallow the United States to recognize differencesnomination of a Shareholder Nominee (and may declare such nomination ineligible), notwithstanding that proxies in local law, tax policy or custom.

20. Notices.

C-7



        All notices or other communications by a participant to the Company under or in connection with the 2002 Plan shall be deemed torespect of such vote may have been duly given when received in the form specified by the Company atcorporation:

i.    who is not independent from the location, or by the person, designated by the Company for the receipt thereof.

21. Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares.
        The Company shall not be obligated to issue shares with respect to an option unless the exercise of such optioncorporation and the issuance and deliveryEligible Shareholder (and any Constituent Holder), applying the listing standards of such shares pursuant thereto shall comply with all applicable provisions of law, domestic or foreign, including, without limitation, the Exchange Act, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, all regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stockprincipal U.S. exchange or automated quotation system upon which the shares may thencommon stock of the corporation is listed, any applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and any publicly disclosed standards used by the Board of Directors in determining and disclosing independence of the corporation’s directors, in each case as determined by the Board of Directors (and, in the case of independence from the Eligible Shareholder (and any Constituent Holder), also applying the foregoing independence standards as if such shareholder were the corporation) or who is or has been within the past three year(s) an officer, director or employee of the corporation or of an Eligible Shareholder (or of any Constituent Holder);

ii.    whose service as a member of the Board of Directors would violate or cause the corporation to be listedin violation of these Bylaws, the Certificate of Incorporation, the rules and listing standards of the principal U.S. exchange upon which the common stock of the corporation is traded, or quoted, and shall be further subjectany applicable law, rule or regulation;

iii.    who has been, within the past three years, an officer or director of a competitor, as defined for purposes of Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, as amended;

iv.    if the Eligible Shareholder (or any Constituent Holder) or applicable Shareholder Nominee otherwise breaches or fails to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.

22. No Right to Options or to Employment.
        This contract is between the Company and the individual participant and does notcomply in any way altermaterial respect with its obligations pursuant to this Article II(15A) or amendany agreement, representation or undertaking required by this Article II(15A); or

v.    if the existing employment relationship with the Company, its Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate. Participation in the 2002 Plan shall in no way constitute any form of agreement or understanding binding on the Company, Subsidiary or Consolidated Affiliate, express or implied, of continued employmentEligible Shareholder ceases to be an Eligible Shareholder for any length of time, nor shall participation inreason, including but not limited to not owning the 2002 Plan interfere in any way with the lawful rights of the actual employer to terminate the employment relationship, which rights are hereby reserved for that particular legal entity.

23. Limitations on Sales of Stock Purchased Under the 2002 Plan.
        The 2002 Plan is intended to provide common stock for investment and not for resale. The Company does not, however, intend to restrict or influence any participant in the conduct of his or her own affairs. A participant, therefore, may sell stock purchased under the 2002 Plan at any time, subject to compliance with any applicable Federal or state securities laws; provided, however, that because of certain Federal tax requirements, each participant will agree by entering the 2002 Plan, promptly to give the company notice of any such stock disposed of within two years afterProxy Access Request Required Shares through the date of the grantapplicable annual meeting.

vi.    if the corporation shall have received from Noticing Shareholders one or more notices pursuant to Article II(15) of the applicable option, showing the number of such shares disposed of. THE INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE ASSUMES THE RISK OF ANY MARKET FLUCTUATIONS IN THE PRICE OF THE STOCK.

24. 2002 Plan Effective Date and Shareholder Approval.
        The 2002 Plan shall become effective upon approval by the Company's shareholders by a vote sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 423(b)(2) of the Code at the next annual meeting of the shareholders to be held May 8, 2002, which is prior to the first Exercise Date. these Bylaws.

In the event that an Eligible Shareholder, either individually or part of a group, nominates a Shareholder Nominee that is elected to the 2002 PlanBoard of Directors, then such Eligible Shareholder (including any Constituent Holder) shall not be permitted to utilize the provisions set forth in this Article II(15A) for the following two annual meetings after such Shareholder Nominee is approvedelected to the Board of Directors, other than the nomination of such previously elected Shareholder Nominee in accordance with this Article II(15A).

Amend Section 3(c) (Business at Annual and Special Meetings), Section 15 (Notice of Shareholder Business to be Conducted at an Annual Meeting or Special Meeting of Shareholders) and Section 16 (Submission of Questionnaire, Representation and Agreement) of Article II (Shareholders’ Meetings) to make various conforming changes to reflect implementation of proxy access through addition of Section 15A set forth above.

Amend Section 2 (Election of Directors) of Article IV (Board of Directors) to make various conforming changes to reflect implementation of proxy access through addition of Section 15A set forth above.

C-7    |    Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


LOGO


LOGO

Expeditors
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 000004
ENDORSEMENT LINE
SACKPACK
MR A SAMPLE
DESIGNATION (IF ANY)
ADD 1
ADD 2
ADD 3
ADD 4
ADD 5
ADD 6
C123456789
000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext
Electronic Voting Instructions
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Company's shareholders,Internet or telephone must be received by
1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 3, 2016.
Vote by Internet
• Go to www.envisionreports.com/expd
• Or scan the final plan yearQR code with your smartphone
• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
Vote by telephone
• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories &
Canada on a touch tone telephone
• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in
this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
X
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
1234 5678 9012 345
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A The Board of Directors Recommends that you vote FOR all nominees, FOR proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 and AGAINST proposal 6.

1. Election of 11 Directors:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
01 - Robert R. Wright02 -
James
M.
DuBois
03 -
Mark
A.
Emmert
04 - Diane H. Gulyas05 -
Dan
P.
Kourkoumelis
06 -
Michael
J.
Malone
07 - Richard B. McCune08 -
Jeffrey
S.
Musser
09 -
Liane
J.
Pelletier
10 - James L.K. Wang11 -
Tay
Yoshitani

For
Against
Abstain
For
Against
Abstain
2. Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation.
3. Approve 2016 Stock Option Plan.
4. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
5. Approve a Proxy Access Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws.
6. Shareholder Proposal: Recovery of Unearned Management Bonuses.
Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.
Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the existing 1988 Plan shall close on July 31, 2002box.
Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
C 1234567890 J N T
1 U P X 2 6 6 3 0 8 1
MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE
140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND
MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND
MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND
02AKNB


LOGO

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy — Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Corporate Headquarters
1015 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104
Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting – Tuesday, May 3, 2016
Benjamin G. Clark, Bradley S. Powell and Charles J. Lynch, or any of them, each with the 1988 Plan shall be terminated upon distributionpower of shares purchased in such final plan year with any remaining shares registered for issuance under substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote
the 1988 Plan being transferred to Reserves under this 2002 Plan.






C-8



APPENDIX D
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
2014 DIRECTORS' RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
1.Purpose and History
The purposeshares of the Plan is to promoteundersigned, with all the interestspowers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of the Company and its stockholders by (i) attracting and retaining Directors capableShareholders of assuring the future success of the Company by supplementing their cash compensation, if any, and (ii) providing a means for such Directors to increase their holdings of common stock of the Company. The Plan provides for annual awards of Restricted Stock to non-employee Directors.

Prior to the adoption of the Plan by the Board and its approval by the Company’s shareholders, Directors were awarded annual equity awards in the form of restricted stock under the Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. 2008 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (“2008 Directors’ Plan”). The Plan is intended to replace the 2008 Directors’ Plan. If the Plan is approved by Company’s shareholders, the Plan will be effective as of May 7, 2014. Once the Plan is effective, no new awards will be made under the 2008 Directors’ Plan and such plan will be maintained solely for the purpose of administering outstanding awards under such plan.
2.Definitions
As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
(a)
Affiliate” shall mean (i) any entity that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, is     controlled by the Company and (ii) any entity in which the Company has a significant equity interest, in each case as determined by the Committee.
(b)    “Award” shall mean any award of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan.
(c)
Award Agreement” shall mean any written agreement, contract or other instrument or document evidencing any Award granted under the Plan. Each Award Agreement shall be subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and any other terms and conditions (not inconsistent with the Plan) determined by the Committee.
(d)    “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
(e)
“Change in Control” shall mean either one of the following: (i) when any “person,” as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act as amended (other than the Company, a subsidiary thereof or a Company employee benefit plan, including any trustee of such plan acting as trustee) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or (ii) the occurrence of a transaction requiring shareholder approval, and involving the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation.
(f)
Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any regulations promulgated thereunder.
(g)
Committee” shall mean a committee of Directors designated by the Board to administer the Plan.

D-1



(h)
Company” shall mean Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., a Washington corporation, and any successor corporation.
(i)    “Director” shall mean a member of the Board.
(j)
Eligible Person” shall mean any Director who has not been otherwise employed by the Company or any Affiliate during the six (6) months prior to and including the date of any Award granted under the Plan.
(k)
Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(l)
Fair Market Value” shall be the closing price at which Shares were traded on a national securities exchange or the last sale price quoted on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System or any successor or substantially similar market thereto on the date of grant.
(m)
Participant” shall mean an Eligible Person designated to be granted an Award under the Plan.
(n)
Person” shall mean any individual or entity, including a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture or trust.
(o)
Plan” shall mean the Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. 2014 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, as amended from time to time, the provisions of which are set forth herein.
(p)
Restricted Stock” shall mean any Share granted under Section 6(a) of the Plan.
(q)
Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(r)
Share” or “Shares” shall mean a share or shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company or such other securities or property as may become subject to Awards pursuant to an adjustment made under Section 4(c) of the Plan.
3.Administration
(a)Power and Authority of the Committee.
The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. Subject to the express provisions of the Plan and to applicable law, the Committee shall have full power and authority to: (i) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement, including an Award Agreement, relating to the Plan; (ii) establish, amend, suspend or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; and (iii) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, all designations, determinations, interpretations and other decisions under or with respect to the Plan or any Award shall be within the sole discretion of the Committee, may be made at any time and shall be final, conclusive and binding upon any Eligible Person and any holder or beneficiary of any Award.
(b)Power and Authority of the Board.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Board may, at any time and from time to time, without any further action of the Committee, exercise the powers and duties of the Committee under the Plan.

D-2



4.Shares Available for Awards
(a)Shares Available.
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan shall be 250,000. Shares to be issued under the Plan may be either authorized but unissued Shares or Shares re-acquired and held in treasury.
(b)Accounting for Awards.
For purposes of this Section 4, the number of Shares covered by an Award shall be counted on the date of grant of such Award against the aggregate number of Shares available for granting Awards under the Plan. In addition, if any Shares covered by an Award are forfeited, or if an Award otherwise terminates without delivery of any Shares, then the number of Shares counted against the aggregate number of Shares available under the Plan with respect to such Award, to the extent of any such forfeiture or termination, shall again be available for granting Awards under the Plan.
(c)Adjustments.
In the event of any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Shares or other securities of the Company or other event identified by the Committee as affecting the Shares such that an adjustment is necessary or appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust the number and type of Shares subject to outstanding Awards; provided, however, that the number of Shares covered by any Award shall always be a whole number. Any additional shares of common stock of the Company, and any other securities of the Company, that are distributed as a result of adjustments under this Section 4(c) with respect to Shares that have not yet vested in accordance with Section 6(a) and the Participant’s Award Agreement shall be subject to the same restrictions, terms and conditions as the Shares to which they relate.
5.Eligibility
Any Eligible Person shall be eligible to be designated a Participant.
6.Awards
(a)Restricted Stock.
OnTuesday, May 20, 2014, and annually thereafter on each anniversary date, the Committee shall grant the number of Shares of Restricted Stock with a Fair Market Value equal to $200,000 to each Eligible Person, provided that no fractional shares shall be issued with respect to any annual award and for purposes of this limitation, the number of Shares will be rounded down. If3, 2016 at any time there are not sufficient Shares available for issuance under the Plan to permit an award in accordance with the prior sentence, then the number of remaining Shares available for issuance under the Plan will be divided by the number of Eligible Persons. Each Eligible Person will be awarded the number of Shares equal to the quotient so calculated, provided that no fractional shares will be issued, and for purposes of this limitation, the number of Shares will be rounded down. Awards will be subject to the following terms and conditions, and such additional terms and conditions not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine:
(i)    Vesting Schedule. The Committee may, but is not required to, subject a grant of Shares of Restricted Stock to a vesting schedule. If applicable, the vesting schedule will be set forth in each Participant’s Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a Change in Control, all Awards outstanding at

D-3



the date thereof shall accelerate and become fully vested as of the date of the Change in Control, to the extent such awards are unvested as of the date of the Change in Control.
(ii)    Forfeiture. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, if a vesting schedule is imposed on a grant of Shares of Restricted Stock in accordance with Section 6(a)(i) and the terms of a Participant’s Award Agreement, upon a Participant’s termination as a Director of the Company prior to the time Shares vest , all applicable Shares of Restricted Stock at such time subject to such restriction shall be forfeited and reacquired by the Company; provided, however, that the Committee may, when it finds that a waiver would be in the best interest of the Company, waive in whole or in part any or all remaining restrictions with respect to Shares of Restricted Stock.
(iii)    Stock Certificates. With respect to any Award that is fully vested at the time of grant, the Company shall cause the Shares to be issued in the name of the Participant, either by book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates evidencing the Shares. With respect to any Award that has had a vesting schedule imposed in accordance with Section 6(a)(i) and the terms of a Participant’s Award Agreement, the Company shall cause the Shares to be issued in the name of Participant, either by book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates evidencing the Shares, which certificate or certificates shall be held by the Secretary of the Company or the stock transfer agent or brokerage service selected by the Secretary of the Company to provide such services for the Plan until all Shares subject to an annual Award have become vested pursuant to Sections 6(a)(i) hereof (the “Final Vesting Date”).The Shares shall be restricted from transfer and shall be subject to an appropriate stop-transfer order. If any certificate is used, the certificate shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the restrictions applicable to the Shares. Participant hereby agrees to the retention by the Company of the Shares and, if a stock certificate is used, agrees to execute and deliver to the Company a blank stock power with respect to the Shares as a condition to the receipt of this award of Shares. Promptly after the Final Vesting Date, the Company shall cause to be issued a certificate or certificates, registered in the name of Participant or in the name of Participant’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, evidencing such Shares and shall cause such certificate or certificates to be delivered to Participant or Participant’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, free of the legend or the stop-transfer order referenced above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Director separates from service as a Director prior to the Final Vesting Date, the Company shall cause to be issued a certificate or certificates, registered in the name of Participant or in the name of Participant’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, evidencing such Shares that have vested as of the date of such separation from service, and shall cause such certificate or certificates to be delivered to Participant or Participant’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, free of the legend or the stop-transfer order referenced above.
(b)General.
(i)    Limits on Transfer of Awards. Until such time as Shares have been delivered pursuant to Section 6(a)(iii) above, no Award and no right under any such Award shall be transferable by a Participant otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and the Company shall not be required to recognize any attempted assignment of such rights by any Participant and no Award or right under any such Award may be pledged, alienated, attached or otherwise encumbered, and any purported pledge, alienation, attachment or other encumbrance thereof shall be void and unenforceable against the Company or any Affiliate; provided, however that, if so determined by the Committee, Awards may be transferable as determined by the Committee.
(ii)    Restrictions; Securities Exchange Listing. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, all Shares delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award shall be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan, and applicable federal or state securities laws and regulatory requirements, and the Committee may direct appropriate stop transfer orders and cause other legends to be placed on the certificates for such Shares to reflect such restrictions. If the Shares are traded on a

D-4



securities exchange, the Company shall not be required to deliver any Shares covered by an Award unless and until such Shares have been admitted for trading on such securities exchange.
7.Amendment and Termination; Adjustments
(a)Amendments to the Plan.
The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that
(i)    no amendment or termination shall, without the written consent of a Director, adversely affect the     Director’s rights under outstanding Awards of Restricted Stock;
(ii)    shareholder approval shall be required of any amendment that would increase the Shares available under the Plan as set forth in Section 4(a) hereof, change the formula for Awards as provided in Section 6(a) hereof, or permit is issuance of Awards other than as permitted under Section 6(a) hereof; and
(iii)    shareholder approval shall be required of any amendment for which shareholder approval is required under applicable law or the rules of any national securities exchange or automated quotation system on which are listed or quoted any of the company’s equity securities.
(b)Correction of Defects, Omissions and Inconsistencies.
The Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award in the manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry the Plan into effect.
8.General Provisions
(a)Plan Provisions Control.
In the event that any provision of an Award Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent in any respect with the terms of the Plan as set forth herein or subsequently amended, the terms of the Plan shall control.
(b)No Rights of Stockholders Until Shares Vest; Dividends.
Neither a Participant nor the Participant’s legal representative shall be, or have any of the rights and privileges of, a stockholder of the Company with respect to any Shares unless and until such Shares are vested in accordance with Section 6(a) hereof and the Participant’s Award Agreement. From and after the date Shares become vested in accordance with Section 6(a) and the Participant’s Award Agreement, a Participant or a Participant’s legal representative shall have the right to vote such Shares. As a condition to receiving the Shares under the Plan with respect to any Award subject to a vesting schedule at the time of grant, Participant hereby agrees to forfeit the receipt of dividends paid on the Shares. This forfeiture provision shall terminate and be of no further force and effect with respect to such Shares as of the Final Vesting Date. For purposes of clarity, cash dividends or other cash distributions to be paid with respect to the Shares, if such payment date is prior to the Final Vesting Date, shall be forfeited to the Company; and any cash dividends or other cash distributions payable with respect to the Shares, if such payment date is on or after the Final Vesting Date, shall be distributed to Participant at the same time cash dividends or other cash distributions are distributed to stockholders of the Company generally.

D-5



(c)No Limit on Other Compensation Arrangements.
Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company or any Affiliate from adopting or continuing in effect other or additional compensation arrangements, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.
(d)No Right to Continued Service.
The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Director the right to continue as a Director, nor will it affect in any way the right to terminate the term of a Director, free from any liability or any claim under the Plan or any Award, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in any Award Agreement. Nothing in this Plan shall confer on any Person any legal or equitable right against the Company or any Affiliate, directly or indirectly, or give rise to any cause of action at law or in equity against the Company or an Affiliate. Under no circumstances shall any Director ceasing to be a Director of the Company or any Affiliate be entitled to any compensation for any loss of any right or benefit under the Plan which such Director might otherwise have enjoyed but for termination of the term of such Director, whether such compensation is claimed by way of damages for wrongful or unfair dismissal, breach of contract or otherwise. By participating in the Plan, each Participant shall be deemed to have accepted all the conditions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of any rules and regulations adopted by the Committee and shall be fully bound thereby.
(e)Governing Law.
The validity, construction and effect of the Plan or any Award, and any rules and regulations relating to the Plan or any Award, shall be determined in accordance with the internal laws, and not the law of conflicts, of the State of Washington. Any lawsuit with respect to an Award issued under the Plan shall be brought in the federal or state courts in the districts which include King County, Washington.
(f)Severability.
If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the purpose or intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction or Award, and the remainder of the Plan or any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.
(g)No Trust or Fund Created.
Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company or any Affiliate and an Eligible Person or any other Person.
(h)Other Benefits.
The value of Shares awarded to any Participant under the Plan shall not be included for the purpose of computing such Participant’s compensation under any compensation-based retirement, disability, or similar plan of the Company unless required by law or otherwise provided by such other plan.
(i)Headings.
Headings are given to the Sections and subsections of the Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings shall not be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction or interpretation of the Plan or any provision thereof.

D-6



(j)Conditions Precedent to Issuance of Shares.
Shares shall not be issued pursuant to an Award unless the issuance and delivery of such Shares shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the requirements of any applicable Stock Exchange and the Washington Business Corporation Act, as amended.
(k)Section 409A.
It is intended that the Plan and any Award thereunder will be exempt from or compliant with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or any Award Agreements thereunder, (i) no Award shall be granted, credited, deferred, accelerated, extended, paid out or modified under this Plan in a manner that would result in the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Code upon a Participant, and (ii) the Committee may from time to time amend, in whole or in part, any or all of the provisions of the Plan or an Award Agreement to the extent necessary, in the sole discretion of the Committee, to cause the Plan or Award Agreement to meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
9.Effective Date of the Plan
The Plan shall be effective on June 1, 2014 if approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual meeting on May 7, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). No award will be made under the Plan prior to the Effective Date. If the Plan is not approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Plan will not be effective.
10.Term of the Plan
(a)    The Plan will terminate upon the earliest of:
(i)    June 1, 2019;
(ii)    at such time as there are no longer any Shares available for issuance under the Plan; or
(iii)    the date of discontinuation or termination of the Plan pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Plan.
(b)    No Award shall be granted under the Plan after June 1, 2019 or any earlier date of discontinuation or termination established pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Plan. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Committee provided for hereunder with respect to the Plan and any Awards, and the authority of the Board to amend the Plan and Awards under the Plan, shall extend beyond the termination of the Plan.





D-7


























[This page intentionally left blank.]





APPENDIX E
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
2014 DIRECTORS' RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of ___________, 20__ (the “Date of Grant”) between Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company”), and the recipient named herein (the “Director”).

WHEREAS, the Company has approved and adopted the 2014 Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”), pursuant to which non-employee members of the Company’s Board are granted restricted shares of common stock, $.01 par value, of the Company (the “Common Stock”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, on May 20 of each year, Participants are granted the number of Shares of Restricted Stock with a Fair Market Value as of the Date of Grant equal to $200,000, with the number of Shares rounded down to eliminate any fractional share;

WHEREAS, unless otherwise provided in this Award Agreement, capitalized words used herein are defined in the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby grants to Director [NUMBER (NUMBER)] Shares (the “Award), subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan.

1.    Date of Grant. This Award is granted on May 20, 20___.

2.    Vesting. [Check applicable box below]

[ ]    This Award shall be fully (100%) vested on the Date of Grant.

OR

[ ]    This Award shall vest in equal amounts on the last day of each of the _____ months ending after the Date of Grant, with _______ of the Shares of Restricted Stock vesting on each such day.

3.    Forfeiture of Dividends. If this Award is subject to a vesting schedule pursuant to Section 2 above, the dividend forfeiture provisions of Section 8(b) of the Plan shall apply until the Final Vesting Date, as defined by the Plan.

4.    Plan Provisions Control. In the event that any provision of this Award Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent in any respect with the terms of the Plan as set forth herein or subsequently amended, the terms of the Plan shall control.

5.    Governing Law. The validity, construction and effect of the Plan or this Award Agreement, and any rules and regulations relating to the Plan or this Award Agreement, shall be determined in accordance with the internal laws, and not the law of conflicts, of the State of Washington. Any lawsuit with respect to this Award Agreement shall be brought in the federal or state courts in the districts which include King County, Washington.

6    Conditions Precedent to Issuance of Shares. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to this Award unless the issuance and delivery of such Shares shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the requirements of any applicable Stock Exchange and the Washington Business Corporation Act, as amended.

E-1





7.    Director Acknowledgments. Director acknowledges that he has read and understands the terms of this Agreement and that:

(a) By acceptance of the Award, he agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the Company harmless from and against loss or liability arising from the transfer of the Shares issued pursuant thereto or any interest therein in violation of the provisions of the Securities Act or of this Award Agreement;

(b) He is not entitled to any rights as a shareholder with respect to any Shares issuable hereunder until he becomes a shareholder of record; and

(c) The Shares subject hereto may be adjusted in the event of certain organic changes in the capital structure of the Company or for any other reason permitted by the Plan.

8.    Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be made or given hereunder shall be hand delivered or mailed by certified or registered mail to the Company’s address set forth below, or to the Director’s address on file9:00 a.m. at the Company’s Stock Administration departmentCorporate Headquarters, 1015 Third Avenue,
Seattle, WA 98104, or as changed from time to timeat any postponement or adjournment thereof.
Shares represented by written notice to the other.

Notices shallthis proxy will be deemed received and effective upon the earlier of (i) hand delivery to the recipient, (ii) five days after the date of postmarkvoted by the United States Postal Service or its successor or (iii) postingshareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote
FOR all nominees, FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 and AGAINST Proposal 6.
In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
(Items to be voted appear on the service provider’s stock option website.
Company:Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Attention: Stock Administration
1015 Third Avenue, 12thFloor
Seattle, Washington 98104
reverse side.)
9. C Non-Voting Items
Award Agreement Subject to PlanChange of Address — Please print new address below.
. This Award and this Award Agreement evidencing and confirming the same are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and in any amendments to the Plan existing now or in the future, which terms and conditions are incorporated herein by reference.IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A copy will be made available upon request. Should any conflict exist between the provisions of the Plan and those of this Award Agreement, those of the Plan shall govern and control. This Award Agreement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between the Company and the Director with respect to the Award.

Dated as of the ___ day of _____, 20__.

By Director’s signature below, Director represents that he is familiar with the terms and terms and provisions of the Plan, and hereby accepts this Award Agreement subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof. Director has reviewed the Plan and this Award Agreement in their entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Award Agreement and fully understands all provisions of this Award Agreement. Director agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of the Committee upon any questions arising under the Plan or this Award Agreement.

PARTICIPANT                     EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL- C ON BOTH SIDES OF WASHINGTON, INC.

By: _________________________________________

Participant ____________________        Its: __________________________________________


E-2



























THIS CARD.